[JurajCrane]

Originally Posted by nole_no1

Trollander at his best

That was when he predicted Djokovic to defend Wimbledon in 2012.

[bookish]

Originally Posted by Sunset of Age

Much will be depending on which side of the draw he ends up. Until the draw comes out, speculation is rather silly.

Murray is most definitely A favourite, but I can see at least three others too.

It can't matter to Murray much which side of the draw he is. Maybe he'd prefer Nole in the semi and then a tired Fed in the final, but its still a much more significant draw for the top 2.

[ChampionshipPoints]

Right after losing to Jeremy Chardy?

[Moozza]

Originally Posted by Houstonko

yeah difference is Fed and Djok drop by not playing their best. Murray drop sets playing his best, by the time the final comes his percentage all used up. Look at the s-final, tsonga took him out. Nobody can play high percentage every game. Murray need to reserve his high percentage game in the final as he is inferior player, hitting big and painting lines. Unable to do so due to opponents in front forcing him. Conclude he isnt smooth enough beating scrubs, still many efforts.

I would't say Murray drops sets playing his best. What matches are you thinking of?

[rocketassist]

Wilander is another product-promoting wagon hopper.

Like Mac, no idea why anyone pays attention.

[howyesno]

Originally Posted by Sunset of Age

Much will be depending on which side of the draw he ends up. Until the draw comes out, speculation is rather silly.

Murray is most definitely A favourite, but I can see at least three others too.

care to explain what's the difference between:

1) nole in SF, fed in F
2) fed in SF, nole in F

[rocketassist]

Originally Posted by howyesno

care to explain what's the difference between:

1) nole in SF, fed in F
2) fed in SF, nole in F

Er they're different?

[Mark Lenders]

Here we go again...

Murray always seems to be the favorite, but that means squat until he actually wins one.

[Ad Wim]

Taking Rafael Nadal out, that might mean that he only has to beat one of Novak Djokovic and Roger Federer along the way and that's going to make it easier.

Lol, another very good, well thought out argument, Mats

[Han Solo]

Murray "the main favourite". Err, no.

[howyesno]

Originally Posted by rocketassist

Er they're different?

like in 2+3 having different result than 3+2?

[Radar]

Why, though? Cause of the Olympics? K.

[Han Solo]

...I mean, we have the current world number one, in pretty decent form, most recent major winner AND most recent HC masters winner on one hand...

and on the other we have the current world number two, also a recent HC masters winner, generally regarded as the best HC player over the last eighteen months or so (?), who is the defending champion of the US Open...

but Murray is "the main favourite"?

These people, sweet jesus.

[rinnegan]

trololol

[nole_no1]

Originally Posted by JurajCrane

That was when he predicted Djokovic to defend Wimbledon in 2012.

Got to say not even i believed that and i'm a pretty optimistic fan But Murray being the main favourite for US Open sounds even worse