Is best of 3 sets the same "mindset" as best of 5? - MensTennisForums.com

MensTennisForums.com

MenstennisForums.com is the premier Men's Tennis forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!

View Poll Results: Is best of 3 the same mindset?

Yes, everytime a player went down 2 sets at a slam they would have lost if it were BO3 1 10.00%
Nope, the top players mindset would have been more clutch/other guy choke 8 80.00%
Not sure 1 10.00%
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

Old 08-09-2012, 10:10 PM   #1
country flag 2003
Registered User
 
2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 2,398
2003 has a reputation beyond repute2003 has a reputation beyond repute2003 has a reputation beyond repute2003 has a reputation beyond repute2003 has a reputation beyond repute2003 has a reputation beyond repute2003 has a reputation beyond repute2003 has a reputation beyond repute2003 has a reputation beyond repute2003 has a reputation beyond repute2003 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Is best of 3 sets the same "mindset" as best of 5?

In terms of the top players.

We all know BO3 and BO5 is a different mindset and different ballgame. But it is still tennis and the sets still play and are scored the same.

What I am basically getting at is, do you think that every time a top player went down 2 sets to 0 or 2 sets to 1 at a slam, they would have lost had the formet been best of 3?

Or do you think that a top player maybe doesn't quite put 100% of his focus into set 2 if he gets broken, knowing that he has that buffer of another set, especially if its against a lesser player.

So Berdych 2 sets to 0 over Fed at AO 2009, when Fed went down 2 sets at Wimbledon this year, Hewitt to Russel at AO 2007 etc etc. All the times Djoko went down 2 sets at slams recently.

Do you think all those matches would have been lost by the top guys if slams were BO3 format? Or do you think they would have upped their game/the opponent choke?
__________________
"I did not play my best tennis, no? And..that is what enable him to win..to win this match no? "

- Rafael Nadal, ever so "humble", - press conference after shock 4 set loss to Robeen Soderling @ 2009 French Open 4th round.


Proud member of the Anti Dull Alliance
2003 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 08-09-2012, 11:08 PM   #2
country flag Kei_is_a_samurai
Banned!
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 167
Kei_is_a_samurai has a reputation beyond reputeKei_is_a_samurai has a reputation beyond reputeKei_is_a_samurai has a reputation beyond reputeKei_is_a_samurai has a reputation beyond reputeKei_is_a_samurai has a reputation beyond reputeKei_is_a_samurai has a reputation beyond reputeKei_is_a_samurai has a reputation beyond reputeKei_is_a_samurai has a reputation beyond reputeKei_is_a_samurai has a reputation beyond reputeKei_is_a_samurai has a reputation beyond reputeKei_is_a_samurai has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Is best of 3 sets the same "mindset" as best of 5?

I think it varies.

Fed may have played a 2nd set tb v benny if it was bo3

I oddly think Nadal would have beat Rosol if it was bo3

The better players if they go two sets down, always seem to win sets 3,4 and 5. So it makes sense in a bo3 if they lose the first then they regroup in 2 and 3.

The top guys have better fitness and mental strength/belief which helps.
Kei_is_a_samurai is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios