[Commander Data]

Originally Posted by Ilovetheblues_86

Kant was Taurus, earth sign.

This means he never did anything out of his reach and was a very egoistical and materialistical person.

He almost never left Konigsberg because materialist like all taurus people, he felt he would be losing his identity and his identity as a true prussian.

He always walked at 15:30 so that the ladies could adjust their clock to the right time.

Also he only decided to dedicate himself to philosophy after he was 39 when he realized he was mature enough. Things that only true meisters do.

When he realized an english guy called David Hume and other people said that we could determine all rules by rationalism and by the experience, he decided it was needed to put things into perspective and said that without the human sensibility, things wouldnt exist by their own. Which means, in other words, that Kant was some kind of humanist, he was afraid that human people were considering that things in the universe were defining how the universe is rather than human experience. In this sense he inspired the romantism of the XIX century without forgetting true science.

Also Kant thought that society would be better if anyone could act in a way they wanted that all humans acted. So its just an extension of the christian law: do to the others what you want them to do for yourselves.

For example, when AJ says I am boring with my philosophy, he is not following Kant, because I could say that his love for Slovenja is boring aswell, and we would both not following Kants imperative.

Are you telling me, you seriously believe, that the position of some randomly chosen agglomerations of hydrogen and helium gas some 10 000 000 000 000 000's km away had character-forming powers when Kants body left his mothers womb?! If so, what would the explanation of the causal link between Kants nature and said agglomerations of gas look like?

[Ilovetheblues_86]

In the quest for FUN.

Me believes everything.

çept your a girl.

[GOAT = Fed]

Strong philosophy ITT.

[acionescu]

He has also a strong TT philosophy

[GOAT = Fed]

Originally Posted by acionescu

He has also a strong TT philosophy

You team up with him then?

[acionescu]

Yup, he's the Annacone to my Federer

[tripwires]

Originally Posted by Ilovetheblues_86

Kant was Taurus, earth sign.

This means he never did anything out of his reach and was a very egoistical and materialistical person.

He almost never left Konigsberg because materialist like all taurus people, he felt he would be losing his identity and his identity as a true prussian.

He always walked at 15:30 so that the ladies could adjust their clock to the right time.

Also he only decided to dedicate himself to philosophy after he was 39 when he realized he was mature enough. Things that only true meisters do.

Thanks for the biographical background. I am especially enlightened by the fact that he was a Taurus.

When he realized an english guy called David Hume and other people said that we could determine all rules by rationalism and by the experience, he decided it was needed to put things into perspective and said that without the human sensibility, things wouldnt exist by their own. Which means, in other words, that Kant was some kind of humanist, he was afraid that human people were considering that things in the universe were defining how the universe is rather than human experience. In this sense he inspired the romantism of the XIX century without forgetting true science.

What did he say about humans being an end and not just a means or whatever and what does that mean? What does he say about freedom? Do you want to write my essay for me?

Also Kant thought that society would be better if anyone could act in a way they wanted that all humans acted. So its just an extension of the christian law: do to the others what you want them to do for yourselves.

Yeah you're right, the categorical imperative is rather Christian. What does "categorical imperative" even mean?

For example, when AJ says I am boring with my philosophy, he is not following Kant, because I could say that his love for Slovenja is boring aswell, and we would both not following Kants imperative.

We should all follow Hobbes.

Originally Posted by Ilovetheblues_86

Immannuel ****

I approve of this post.

Originally Posted by acionescu

Yup, he's the Annacone to my Federer

Omg best analogy of all-time.

[Action Jackson]

Originally Posted by Ilovetheblues_86

For example, when AJ says I am boring with my philosophy, he is not following Kant, because I could say that his love for Slovenja is boring aswell, and we would both not following Kants imperative.

It's actually very simple what I said. Delivered in a Brazilian or French accent the ramblings become deep and meaningful, if it was done in an English, Australian or American then it's full of shit.

The above doesn't need Heidegger, Kirkegaard, Jung, Klima or Žižek to work that out.

[Ilovetheblues_86]

Originally Posted by Action Jackson

It's actually very simple what I said. Delivered in a Brazilian or French accent the ramblings become deep and meaningful, if it was done in an English, Australian or American then it's full of shit.

The above doesn't need Heidegger, Kirkegaard, Jung, Klima or Žižek to work that out.

Just write a romance in russian and you beat them all.

What did he say about humans being an end and not just a means or whatever and what does that mean? What does he say about freedom? Do you want to write my essay for me?

If I say:

In MTF is prohibited to wish death on Kudryavtsev because it disrupts the peace of the forum, then you are just using humanity as a mean to achieve peace.

But if you say in MTF is prohibited to wish death on Dasnieres de Veigy because those feelings are wrong and show the poster doesnt have a human heart, than you are using humanity as an end.

[acionescu]

What about wishing death on Gilles Simon?

[Action Jackson]

Originally Posted by Ilovetheblues_86

Just write a romance in russian and you beat them all.

1-0 Saulo

[Commander Data]

Originally Posted by Ilovetheblues_86

In the quest for FUN.

Me believes everything.

I take this as you admitting to talk non-sense, Kant would disapprove.

[Ilovetheblues_86]

Not really.

Astrology is still a better way to understand other people using archetypes than Jung ever imagined.

Even if you cant discover how someone is you still can have lots of fun in the process.

And get some girls ofc.

' I heard you have venus in scorpio. As soon as I realized this I knew you were too sexy even for a God to handle"

Ok that was lame. If you consider Venus was a goddess born from Uranus testicles, probably.

[tennizen]

[Thanos]

that archetypes used in astrology are based on vague, ambiguous, and general statements that could relate to anything. it has already been proven to be a pseudoscience, and really has no merit to guide someone life or behaviour.