S.Q.T. (stupid question thread) - Page 30 - MensTennisForums.com

MensTennisForums.com

MenstennisForums.com is the premier Men's Tennis forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!

Reply

Old 06-05-2013, 11:00 PM   #436
country flag ProdigyEng
#1
 
ProdigyEng's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Age: 21
Posts: 26,646
ProdigyEng has a reputation beyond reputeProdigyEng has a reputation beyond reputeProdigyEng has a reputation beyond reputeProdigyEng has a reputation beyond reputeProdigyEng has a reputation beyond reputeProdigyEng has a reputation beyond reputeProdigyEng has a reputation beyond reputeProdigyEng has a reputation beyond reputeProdigyEng has a reputation beyond reputeProdigyEng has a reputation beyond reputeProdigyEng has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: S.Q.T. (stupid question thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bjurra View Post
Very funny.
I hate to admit it but it was a serious question...

Whilst watching tennis it's just never something that has really crossed my mind..
ProdigyEng is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 06-06-2013, 12:48 AM   #437
country flag buddyholly
RAVE ON
 
buddyholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 13,968
buddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: S.Q.T. (stupid question thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bjurra View Post
Accidently touching the bottom of the net with your foot shouldnt cost you the point.
)
Balls that land just a millimetre out shouldn't cost you the point. After all, it was that close to being a winner. So just missing by a millimetre shouldn't cost you the point.

Seriously, the best games are those with the simplest, clearest rules. A rule for just touching the net slightly and a different rule for touching it more than slightly would make things impossible.
__________________
JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY
buddyholly is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 11:50 AM   #438
country flag B-Nard
Tomic the Tank engine.
 
B-Nard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,620
B-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: S.Q.T. (stupid question thread)

Are there any night matches at this years Roland Garros? Would Jo/Ferrer be postponed if Nodul is a five setter?
B-Nard is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 01:42 PM   #439
country flag August
Registered User
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Freistaat Bayern, DE
Age: 24
Posts: 4,828
August has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: S.Q.T. (stupid question thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by B-Nard View Post
Are there any night matches at this years Roland Garros? Would Jo/Ferrer be postponed if Nodul is a five setter?
No, for some reason Trolland Garros organizers haven't made the investment that even 250s do, install lights.
__________________
My blog: August on Sports
My twitter: @AugustOnSports


Stan Wawrinka
The Saviour of Tennis
Australian Open 2014: Ended Nadal-Djokovic-Murray dominance in Slams
Monte Carlo 2014: Ended Nadal-Djokovic dominance in Masters
August is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 02:33 PM   #440
country flag B-Nard
Tomic the Tank engine.
 
B-Nard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1,620
B-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond reputeB-Nard has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: S.Q.T. (stupid question thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by August View Post
No, for some reason Trolland Garros organizers haven't made the investment that even 250s do, install lights.
Can not believe it.
B-Nard is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 03:23 PM   #441
country flag bluefork
Registered User
 
bluefork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 2,058
bluefork has a reputation beyond reputebluefork has a reputation beyond reputebluefork has a reputation beyond reputebluefork has a reputation beyond reputebluefork has a reputation beyond reputebluefork has a reputation beyond reputebluefork has a reputation beyond reputebluefork has a reputation beyond reputebluefork has a reputation beyond reputebluefork has a reputation beyond reputebluefork has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: S.Q.T. (stupid question thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by August View Post
No, for some reason Trolland Garros organizers haven't made the investment that even 250s do, install lights.
I thought the reason there are no night matches at RG is that the city won't allow it.
bluefork is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 03:32 PM   #442
country flag GasquetGulbis
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Age: 23
Posts: 1,611
GasquetGulbis has a reputation beyond reputeGasquetGulbis has a reputation beyond reputeGasquetGulbis has a reputation beyond reputeGasquetGulbis has a reputation beyond reputeGasquetGulbis has a reputation beyond reputeGasquetGulbis has a reputation beyond reputeGasquetGulbis has a reputation beyond reputeGasquetGulbis has a reputation beyond reputeGasquetGulbis has a reputation beyond reputeGasquetGulbis has a reputation beyond reputeGasquetGulbis has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: S.Q.T. (stupid question thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by August View Post
No, for some reason Trolland Garros organizers haven't made the investment that even 250s do, install lights.
I think it's because they are trying to stay traditional, the same reason they won't bring in Hawk-eye.
GasquetGulbis is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2013, 04:01 PM   #443
country flag August
Registered User
 
August's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Freistaat Bayern, DE
Age: 24
Posts: 4,828
August has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond reputeAugust has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: S.Q.T. (stupid question thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GasquetGulbis View Post
I think it's because they are trying to stay traditional, the same reason they won't bring in Hawk-eye.
I think the biggest reason has been that they haven't felt need for lights. Sun sets in Paris at 9:45pm which is later than at any other slam. In London it's 9pm, in NYC it's 7:30pm, in Melbourne it's 8:30pm. I think they thought 9:45pm is enough late to stap play.

But now even 250s have lights and so should RG have too. But I think they aren't too willing to make any investments to RG before they know a slam can be held there also in the future.

And I don't think traditionalism is the reason for no Hawkeye, it's used nowhere on clay. Hawkeye just has some issues on clay.
__________________
My blog: August on Sports
My twitter: @AugustOnSports


Stan Wawrinka
The Saviour of Tennis
Australian Open 2014: Ended Nadal-Djokovic-Murray dominance in Slams
Monte Carlo 2014: Ended Nadal-Djokovic dominance in Masters
August is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 09:49 PM   #444
country flag abollo
Tennis Player
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Cairo
Posts: 5,561
abollo has a reputation beyond reputeabollo has a reputation beyond reputeabollo has a reputation beyond reputeabollo has a reputation beyond reputeabollo has a reputation beyond reputeabollo has a reputation beyond reputeabollo has a reputation beyond reputeabollo has a reputation beyond reputeabollo has a reputation beyond reputeabollo has a reputation beyond reputeabollo has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: S.Q.T. (stupid question thread)

Is there a rule on when it is allowed to water the court?
__________________
Es irrt der Mensch so lang er strebt
Roger Federer .. Malek Jaziri
abollo is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 10:49 PM   #445
country flag appleGirl
Registered User
 
appleGirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Age: 27
Posts: 1,446
appleGirl has a reputation beyond reputeappleGirl has a reputation beyond reputeappleGirl has a reputation beyond reputeappleGirl has a reputation beyond reputeappleGirl has a reputation beyond reputeappleGirl has a reputation beyond reputeappleGirl has a reputation beyond reputeappleGirl has a reputation beyond reputeappleGirl has a reputation beyond reputeappleGirl has a reputation beyond reputeappleGirl has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: S.Q.T. (stupid question thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by abollo View Post
Is there a rule on when it is allowed to water the court?
It's not really an answer, but the grand slams rulebook doesn't contain any info about that (I was wondering that as well).
__________________
http://www.letsecondserve.com/

TT Singles: 105 (Best: 80) 2011: Fürth CH W, Izmir CH W, Seoul CH W, Sao Jose Do Rio Preto CH W; 2012: Tiburon CH W
TT Doubles: 48 (Best: 42) 2011: Izmir CH W (w/ Mahqz); 2012: US Open SF (w/Mahqz), Tiburon CH W (w/Mahqz), Antalya Fut W (w/Mahqz); 2013: Winston Salem W (w/Mahqz), US Open SF (w/Mahqz)
No.1vak Djokovic!

"Is something unbelievable how he returns, no? His return probably is one of the best of the history. That's my opinion, no? I never played against a player who's able to return like this. Almost every time." - R. Nadal about N. Djokovic
appleGirl is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 12:06 AM   #446
country flag GhostUnholy
Registered User
 
GhostUnholy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 24
Posts: 1,377
GhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: S.Q.T. (stupid question thread)

Can anyone explain to me exactly how Hawkeye's margin of error works. What I read by searching around was that they claim it has a 3.6 mm margin of error.

My understanding of this is as that if you took any discrete point within the distribution of the ball that they draw on the image it produces, that corresponding point of the ball could actually lie within 3.6mm along any vector drawn in any direction from that point. The collective distribution of points around that individual point would correspondingly can very by the exact same magnitude in every direction.

Or in other words, each point is a point estimate of where that corresponding point on the ball lies, and the confidence interval contains 3.6 mm in every direction outward from that point. Would this give you 7.2 mm of possible variation/error?

Is this correct? Or are they suggesting that it is 1.8mm in either direction for a total variability of 3.6 mm?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SetSampras
ROFL.. Have we had any rallies yet? This match already sucks. 1-2 shot rallies and then someone breaks down.
GhostUnholy is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 11:08 AM   #447
country flag Mahqz
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Age: 29
Posts: 3,832
Mahqz has a reputation beyond reputeMahqz has a reputation beyond reputeMahqz has a reputation beyond reputeMahqz has a reputation beyond reputeMahqz has a reputation beyond reputeMahqz has a reputation beyond reputeMahqz has a reputation beyond reputeMahqz has a reputation beyond reputeMahqz has a reputation beyond reputeMahqz has a reputation beyond reputeMahqz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: S.Q.T. (stupid question thread)

How is LL order decided when the players have no ranking?
__________________
TT Singles: W 2014: Heilbronn I
TT Singles: W 2013: Marseille, Sarasota
TT Singles: W 2012: Blois Fut; QF USO
TT Singles ranking: 52 (High: 52)

TT Doubles: W 2013: Winston-Salem, Sarajevo; SF USO (w/ appleGirl)
TT Doubles: W 2012: Antalya, Tiburon; SF USO (w/ appleGirl)
TT Doubles: W 2011: Izmir CH (w/ appleGirl)
TT Doubles ranking: 44 (High: 39)


-- TT Board Member --
Mahqz is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 03:29 PM   #448
country flag Lee
Gugaholic
 
Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Under the blue sky
Posts: 82,850
Lee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: S.Q.T. (stupid question thread)

Quote:
Originally Posted by GhostUnholy View Post
Can anyone explain to me exactly how Hawkeye's margin of error works. What I read by searching around was that they claim it has a 3.6 mm margin of error.

My understanding of this is as that if you took any discrete point within the distribution of the ball that they draw on the image it produces, that corresponding point of the ball could actually lie within 3.6mm along any vector drawn in any direction from that point. The collective distribution of points around that individual point would correspondingly can very by the exact same magnitude in every direction.

Or in other words, each point is a point estimate of where that corresponding point on the ball lies, and the confidence interval contains 3.6 mm in every direction outward from that point. Would this give you 7.2 mm of possible variation/error?

Is this correct? Or are they suggesting that it is 1.8mm in either direction for a total variability of 3.6 mm?
You answered your question here already in the bold part. The point showed on Hawkeye might be 3.6mm from the actual point where the ball landed. Not 1.8mm nor 7.2mm. In any direction.

I haven't done any research. There may be another factor there, the percentage of accuracy. That is, the bold part is correct in ninety something % of times, seldom 100%.
Lee is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 06:15 PM   #449
country flag GhostUnholy
Registered User
 
GhostUnholy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Age: 24
Posts: 1,377
GhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond reputeGhostUnholy has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: S.Q.T. (stupid question thread)

Hey, thanks for your response.

I guess my confusion comes from the fact that if we choose any point X within the distribution they give us for the ball on a Hawkeye image, is the error such that the true position of that point could range from (X-1.8) to (X+1.8), or would it be (X-3.6) to (X+3.6) along a straight line through that point. I'm guessing that it's the first one, otherwise the margin of error simply seems too large. I think you're right also that it must be 90-something % of the time the point falls within that range, but I haven't seen a definitive number anywhere saying how the confidence interval is defined.

Unfortunately everything I found while looking around was just quotes from their rep saying that it had a 3.6mm error but no further explanation.

Another interesting point I noticed was that it says it the 3.6mm of error is in comparison to a high speed camera as the gold standard. It seems to me that it's a useful tool but far from infallible considering the tiny margins of some of the calls decided with it.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by SetSampras
ROFL.. Have we had any rallies yet? This match already sucks. 1-2 shot rallies and then someone breaks down.
GhostUnholy is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 07:19 PM   #450
country flag Lee
Gugaholic
 
Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Under the blue sky
Posts: 82,850
Lee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond reputeLee has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: S.Q.T. (stupid question thread)

Consider a tennis ball is about 6.7cm in diameter, a 3.6mm deviation is pretty close. Also, most of the time, the deviation will not be that high. Here's a typical statistic graph



So basically 95% of the time, the deviation is +/-2 and 68% of time the deviation is +/-1 and 99.7% of time, the deviation is +/-3

Usually when reporting the deviation, 95% is the norm.
Lee is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios