The hack factor.. - MensTennisForums.com

MensTennisForums.com

MenstennisForums.com is the premier Men's Tennis forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!

Reply

Old 06-02-2012, 12:48 AM   #1
country flag sexybeast
Registered User
 
sexybeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,258
sexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond repute
Default The hack factor..

http://www.tennis28.com/studies/hack_factor.html

Anyone seen this before?

It is just a study on what kind of players took down the greats in slams, ranked within 5 cathegories from 0 which is "greats" to 4 which is journeyman who never reached a grand slam QF. Here are the 5 cathegories:

0 - one of the 6-slam winner greats, + Newcombe, Vilas, Courier and Djokovic
1 - won 1-3 slams. I knocked Gomez, Costa, and Johansson and Kriek down to level 2.
2 - showed F/SF slam talent.
3 - solid pro, on occasion might reach slam QF/SF
4 - true journeyman, never reached any slam QF

So, it is interesting to know the quality that was required to take down greats in slams.

Not surprisingly Borg is the most consistant at not falling to journeymen (he never did) and only once fell to a player who never reached SF/F in a slam. On the other hand Borg never hanged around to old age and was exceptional already as a teen. Nadal and Federer are next in the list , here is the frequency of losses to players with no talent to reach a SF in a slam for greats:

Combining Hack Factor 3+4 (I updated their stats with AO 2012+made the stats for Djokovic among the greats):

43% Boris Becker
38% Stefan Edberg
38% Rafael Nadal
37% John McEnroe
37% Pete Sampras
35% Mats Wilander
28% Andre Agassi
27% Ivan Lendl
24% Roger Federer
22% Jimmy Connors
16% Novak Djokovic
6% Bjorn Borg

Also, not surprisingly Sampras was king of losing to absolute mugs, mostly because of his lack of talent on claycourts:

Loss % to Hack Factor 4:


16% Pete Sampras
13% Andre Agassi
13% Stefan Edberg
13% Boris Becker
12% Ivan Lendl
10% Rafael Nadal
6% Jimmy Connors
5% John McEnroe
5% Novak Djokovic
3% Roger Federer
3% Mats Wilander
0% Bjorn Borg

Interesting how the 80s greats lost so often to other 80s greats, Mcenroe mostly beeing hurt losing 50% of his matches to other greats (a grand total of 19 matches) and Lendl ofcourse losing so many finals to great players:¨

To other greats (Hack Factor 0):

50% John McEnroe
48% Novak Djokovic
47% Ivan Lendl
44% Jimmy Connors
39% Roger Federer
38% Boris Becker
35% Stefan Edberg
35% Bjorn Borg
34% Andre Agassi
30% Mats Wilander
23% Rafael Nadal
21% Pete Sampras

Sampras unsurprisngly ranked low having few greats around in his era (besides Agassi who was often away from tennis). Young Djokovic was damaged alot by Nadal+Federer delaying his breakthrought, Federer obviously damaged mostly by Nadal but lately also by a peaking Djokovic at old age.

There are more stats in the site, but these I found most interesting. It once again strengthens my view that Mcenroe was alot better than 7 slams worth, Sampras I have always found most limited and fortunate of alltime greats, 14 slams beeing overachieved.

John Mcenroe having lost 50% of his matches to alltime greats and 37% to factor 3/4 players is interesting, he had peak years with though opposition in SFs and Fs, then his decline was very fast and he hanged around to old age as a ghost of himself losing to low ranked players in slams. Djokovic is one loss against Federer/Nadal to actually equal Mcenroe and have 50% of his losses either at the hands of Nadal or Federer.
__________________
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.

Last edited by sexybeast : 07-08-2012 at 09:05 PM.
sexybeast is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 06-02-2012, 12:59 AM   #2
country flag sexybeast
Registered User
 
sexybeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,258
sexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The hack factor..

I think it would be more fair to count from the first slam final to the last, so players like Mcenroe ho hanged around just for the fun of it would get even more impressive stats, Federer who was a irregular youth and became another player from the day he won Wimbledon 2003 would get completely different stats aswell, here are some selected Greats I have applied this to:

Federer from 2003 Wimbledon:

0-67%
1-16%
2-16%

Mcenroe from 79 Usopen to 85 Usopen:

0-75%
1-0%
2-8%
3-16%

Lendl from 81 RG final to 91 Australian open final:

0-64%
1-18%
2-11%
3-4%
4-4%

Nadal since 2005 RG:

0-31%
1-6%
2-50%
3-6%
4-6%

Sampras from 1990 Usopen final to 2002 Usopen final:

0-26%
1-29%
2-19%
3-10%
4-16%

Connors from AO 73 to Usopen 84:

0-57%
1-14%
2-24%
3-5%

Borg from RG 74 to Usopen 81:

0-50%
1-25%
2-17%
3-8%
__________________
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.

Last edited by sexybeast : 06-02-2012 at 02:15 AM.
sexybeast is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 01:17 AM   #3
country flag HKz
Hakeem
 
HKz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mesa
Posts: 5,235
HKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The hack factor..

Borg's stats certainly can't honestly be counted.. I mean virtually all those players in that list played until the end, causing their stats to suffer actually quite a bit. While certainly not surprising for the dominance Nadal/Sampras have had against "hack factor 0" it is also kind of skewed similarly for both as they were ultimately beating everyone at their best slams (FO/Wimb respectively) and losing to much lower ranked players at the other events making their "hack factor 0" stat look really good.

Either way, the stats are always interesting, but there are several things to take into consideration certainly which kind of makes some of the stats look silly.
__________________
Federer / Haas / Safin / Gaudio / Kuerten / Youzhny / Nadal / Gonzalez / Ljubicic / Hewitt / Soderling / Wawrinka / Coria / Nalbandian / Kohlschreiber
HKz is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 01:18 AM   #4
country flag hipolymer
Registered User
 
hipolymer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Age: 34
Posts: 7,774
hipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The hack factor..

The so called "GOAT" doesn't top even one of the lists.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7F0JOdLZ9DE
Pay your respects to the vultures. . . .
Did you know : the famous gangster Al Capone's criminal headquarters was based inside of a hotel
'82 - '91: best decade in tennis
Sorry Djokonauts, I am a fan of Federer now. I've learned over the years to appreciate his contribution to the game. No one will ever surpass this man's influence.
Federer ~ The consummate professional. Never retired once in a match. Does not go over the time limit on every point.
hipolymer is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 01:19 AM   #5
country flag HKz
Hakeem
 
HKz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Mesa
Posts: 5,235
HKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond reputeHKz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The hack factor..

Quote:
Originally Posted by hipolymer View Post
The so called "GOAT" doesn't top even one of the lists.
What a fantastic comment! Quite unique around here.
__________________
Federer / Haas / Safin / Gaudio / Kuerten / Youzhny / Nadal / Gonzalez / Ljubicic / Hewitt / Soderling / Wawrinka / Coria / Nalbandian / Kohlschreiber
HKz is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 01:54 AM   #6
country flag sexybeast
Registered User
 
sexybeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,258
sexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The hack factor..

Quote:
Originally Posted by hipolymer View Post
The so called "GOAT" doesn't top even one of the lists.
You are definetly not supposed to top 2 out of those 3 lists genius.
__________________
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
sexybeast is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 01:59 AM   #7
country flag Nole fan
The new era of SuperNovak
 
Nole fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 14,374
Nole fan has a reputation beyond reputeNole fan has a reputation beyond reputeNole fan has a reputation beyond reputeNole fan has a reputation beyond reputeNole fan has a reputation beyond reputeNole fan has a reputation beyond reputeNole fan has a reputation beyond reputeNole fan has a reputation beyond reputeNole fan has a reputation beyond reputeNole fan has a reputation beyond reputeNole fan has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The hack factor..

Great stats Sexybeast, thank you.
__________________

Either you get him or you don't.

Novak Djokovic nº1!

The Golden Era of Novak: Australian Open * Dubai * Indian Wells * Miami * Belgrade * Madrid * Rome * Wimbledon * Montreal * US Open * Abu Dhabi * Australian Open * Miami * Toronto * China * Shanghai * World Tour Finals 2012 * Australian Open 2013 * Dubai * Montecarlo * Beijing * Shanghai * Paris * WTF * Indian Wells * Miami * Rome * WIMBLEDON 2014
Federer to Nole: "Amazing year. Amazing tournament. Amazing match. You are THE BEST!"
Nole fan is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-02-2012, 02:04 AM   #8
country flag sexybeast
Registered User
 
sexybeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,258
sexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The hack factor..

Quote:
Originally Posted by HKz View Post
Borg's stats certainly can't honestly be counted.. I mean virtually all those players in that list played until the end, causing their stats to suffer actually quite a bit.
Yes, I know but Borg was one hell of a consistant player, almost like Federer since 2003. Players usually have more trouble at ages like 17-18 than at 30-something, but ofcourse some really hang in there when they are completely outdated (Mcenroe) which makes the stats look more scewed. Mcenroe didnt lose to alot of hack factor 3/4 players in his years as a top player like Sampras did, but still his stats look worse than Sampras' stats.

Quote:
Originally Posted by HKz View Post
While certainly not surprising for the dominance Nadal/Sampras have had against "hack factor 0" it is also kind of skewed similarly for both as they were ultimately beating everyone at their best slams (FO/Wimb respectively) and losing to much lower ranked players at the other events making their "hack factor 0" stat look really good.
Their hack factor 0 looks kind of bad, you want to lose to the best rather than weak players. Sampras pretty much had only Agassi as a factor 0 player in the 90s (with Courier beeing the weakest factor 0 and arguably factor 1 in the beginning of Sampras career). Sampras was one hell of an inconsistant "great", not only on clay but on other surfaces aswell.

Nadal having trouble beating factor 2 players on hardcourt early on in his career not having oppurtunity to go down against Federer/Djokovic in Usopen/AO explains his low frequency of hack 0.
__________________
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.

Last edited by sexybeast : 06-02-2012 at 02:12 AM.
sexybeast is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 12:35 PM   #9
country flag sexybeast
Registered User
 
sexybeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,258
sexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The hack factor..

It looks to me like Djokovic, Nadal and Federer are about to greatly improve their numbers in the coming years. It seems to me they can only lose to each other in slams from now on...
__________________
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
sexybeast is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 12:38 PM   #10
country flag TigerTim
Registered User
 
TigerTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 10,555
TigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The hack factor..

Borg will always be Stats Goat because he retired so young. Only way to stop this is if Nadal retires this year. Which he won't (hopefully).
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiebreak100 View Post
A dishwasher has more personality than Sampras.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SliceAce View Post
As for Mugray, what can be said? A disgusting human being, and awful player, and a choking pushing mug. He looks like a kemo patient, bald spots, hairless legs, pasty blotchy skin, busted teeth, and an ugly, snarling face. Typical antics all came out in this match: faking injuries, grimacing and cursing, trying to peg Fed, trying to start drama, undeserved final based on an exhausted old man and a joke draw.

I'm no Fakervic fan but he needs to save tennis, sadly tree trunk legs will be fresh. Interesting he's never questioned...
TigerTim is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 12:40 PM   #11
country flag sexybeast
Registered User
 
sexybeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,258
sexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The hack factor..

Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerTim View Post
Borg will always be Stats Goat because he retired so young. Only way to stop this is if Nadal retires this year. Which he won't (hopefully).
I dont think Borg would lose to hack factor 4 even at 30, he was very consistent and adaptable to different surfaces.
__________________
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
sexybeast is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 12:41 PM   #12
country flag DJ Soup
Registered User
 
DJ Soup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,022
DJ Soup has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Soup has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Soup has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Soup has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Soup has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Soup has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Soup has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Soup has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Soup has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Soup has a reputation beyond reputeDJ Soup has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The hack factor..

did a quick read, but the guy omitted Gaudio
DJ Soup is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 12:54 PM   #13
country flag Shinoj
Registered User
 
Shinoj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Posts: 3,716
Shinoj has a reputation beyond reputeShinoj has a reputation beyond reputeShinoj has a reputation beyond reputeShinoj has a reputation beyond reputeShinoj has a reputation beyond reputeShinoj has a reputation beyond reputeShinoj has a reputation beyond reputeShinoj has a reputation beyond reputeShinoj has a reputation beyond reputeShinoj has a reputation beyond reputeShinoj has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The hack factor..

Some of the things that i noticed

The people amongst lower the lists like Novak Djokovic,Bjorn Borg, Jimmy Connors,Nadal all play the percentages games very well. You wont see them hitting a lot of unforced Errors. You can count on them that they would hit the shot, that they are supposed to hit at that point on most occassions. Hence they play the percentages game very well. Their Game is less Mercurial and more percentages based. They would be consistent in most of their Careers. Only Exception is Federer, who is quite astounding because he has a superb game and has an equally superb consistency.

While the ones higher up in the list had a Mercurial game. You cannot predict their game so much. Take a Mc Enroe,Becker,Edberg,Sampras,Agassi and so on. It can be understood that while they have their highs which a common sports fan would like to watch it more that the ones Lower down in the list like Nadal or a Connors or a Borg they often had their lows which can attribute to their losses..


Also Edberg in his Twilight days was losing to Mugs very often. Mostly after the Wimbeldon 93. He was losing to Journeymen like Norman,Medvedev and so on.


You gotta be kidding me if you say Sampras's game was limited. I wouldnt want to elaborate on his Net Prowess because it is well documented but when he wanted to stay on baseline he was blowing Agassi off the court. He had almost Everything. And in fact he had everything.

WHy he failed on Clay was because he was so good in rest of the surfaces he did not want to change his style. And that is common Sense. After all why would he want to play like a typical Clay Courter hitting Moonballs and having their backs on the Advertising BillBoards. It would have been very UnSampras like.

Sampras was a Champ.
Shinoj is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 01:07 PM   #14
country flag ServeVolley
Banned!
 
ServeVolley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 1,374
ServeVolley has a reputation beyond reputeServeVolley has a reputation beyond reputeServeVolley has a reputation beyond reputeServeVolley has a reputation beyond reputeServeVolley has a reputation beyond reputeServeVolley has a reputation beyond reputeServeVolley has a reputation beyond reputeServeVolley has a reputation beyond reputeServeVolley has a reputation beyond reputeServeVolley has a reputation beyond reputeServeVolley has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The hack factor..

Quote:
Originally Posted by hipolymer View Post
The so called "GOAT" doesn't top even one of the lists.
Only because he peaked later than some of the other players... You might not realise this, but since the French Open 2003, Federer has never gone out to a player who hadn't/didn't make at least one slam final:

Nalbandian in the 2003 US Open (1x slam finalist)
Keurton in the 2004 French Open (3x slam winner)
Safin in the 2005 Aus Open (2x slam winner)
Nadal in the 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, & 2011 French Open, 2008 Wimbledon, and 2009 & 2012 Aus Open (10x slam winner)
Djokovic in the 2008 & 2011 Aus Open, and 2010 & 2011 US Open (5x slam winner)
Del Potro in the 2009 US Open (1x slam winner)
Soderling in the 2010 French Open (2x slam finalist)
Berdych in 2010 Wimbledon (1x slam finalist)
Tsonga in 2011 Wimbledon (1x slam finalist)
ServeVolley is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 06-07-2012, 01:40 PM   #15
country flag sexybeast
Registered User
 
sexybeast's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,258
sexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond reputesexybeast has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The hack factor..

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shinoj View Post
You gotta be kidding me if you say Sampras's game was limited. I wouldnt want to elaborate on his Net Prowess because it is well documented but when he wanted to stay on baseline he was blowing Agassi off the court. He had almost Everything. And in fact he had everything.

WHy he failed on Clay was because he was so good in rest of the surfaces he did not want to change his style. And that is common Sense. After all why would he want to play like a typical Clay Courter hitting Moonballs and having their backs on the Advertising BillBoards. It would have been very UnSampras like.

Sampras was a Champ.

I dont think it was mentioned that Sampras was limited, but there is no denying that he was prone to lose to low ranked players. I also dont think he would have to become a typical claycourter (like if that was possible) to be great on clay, just play like Laver and Federer, allcourt tennis using touch and their big forehands aswell as learning how to move on clay. Ofcourse Sampras' game was limited when it came to his potential to become a great claycourter.

If a mercurian game meant losing early is difficult to tell, Mcenroe was incredibly consistent between 79 and 85 with a mercurian game, losing to other "greats" 3 times out of 4.
__________________
All things are subject to interpretation whichever interpretation prevails at a given time is a function of power and not truth.
sexybeast is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios