[Certinfy]

You Fedtards going on about how hard Federer's draw is and I totally agree with you, just look at this!

R1: Kamke (78)
R2: Ungur (92)
R3: Klizan (70) / Mahut (89)
R4: Goffin (109) / Clement (139) / Kubot (49) / Serra (156)

Only saving grace is that Beck didn't beat Kubot today as then Federer would have definitely played a player ranked outside the top 100 in R4!

What challenger is this?

[TennisOnWood]

Just thinking about this.. crazy, no words

Not sure this happen in last 10 years

[orangehat]

Originally Posted by Certinfy

You Fedtards going on about how hard Federer's draw is and I totally agree with you, just look at this!

R1: Kamke (78)
R2: Ungur (92)
R3: Klizan (70) / Mahut (89)
R4: Goffin (109) / Clement (139) / Kubot (49) / Serra (156)

What challenger is this?

it was harder than all the other 3 initially though, you can't deny that.

[Mountaindewslave]

ahahha i agree it's pretty remarkable how horribly easy Federer's draw has turned out to be, I mean it's insane that if you literally showed someone a draw of a Challenger and that of Roger's draw up to 4th round someone would probably guess which was which wrong. insane hahah, and they say Nadal rigs everything

[samanosuke]

let me to make it easy for you . even if berdych beats Fed in QF he won't win slam title, neither at this RG, neither in near future or simply said NEVER



hope now you see that you are doing sisyphus job when you are trying to eliminate Fed before berdych match

[IsDonsIsGood]

The top 3 will win their early rounds no matter who they play. It's the possible QF and SF opponents that decide the difficulty of a draw for these guys. Do you think Rafa would trade draws with Federer? Not a chance.

[Renaud]

Even biggest mug is awaiting in 1/4

[scoobs]

I never get why people waste so much time:

1) quailing at the draw when it is made, and

2) then complaining when a player's draw opens up.

You can only beat what's put in front of you - if the "threat" opponents don't make it through, then that's the way it goes. These days the first three rounds should be a cake walk to the top guys anyway because of the 32 seeding.

[Singularity]

Federer hasn't lost before the QF in 8 years. Are lots of easy matches good preparation for a potentially tough QF opponent?

[Certinfy]

Originally Posted by samanosuke

let me to make it easy for you . even if berdych beats Fed in QF he won't win slam title, neither at this RG, neither in near future or simply said NEVER

hope now you see that you are doing sisyphus job when you are trying to eliminate Fed before berdych match

Mate, I honestly think Berdych is going to lose before the QF here anyway! With Del Potro being injured too I wouldn't be surprised if he went out before the QF as well!

[TennisOnWood]

Originally Posted by IsDonsIsGood

The top 3 will win their early rounds no matter who they play. It's the possible QF and SF opponents that decide the difficulty of a draw for these guys. Do you think Rafa would trade draws with Federer? Not a chance.

They will in this weak era but this is insane

[Federer in 2]

It did get very easy, but the thing is that even if Nalby, Lopez or whoever you want would've met Federer, he had absolutely 0% chance of losing before QF.
QF is where it gets interesting, and Fed has got by far the hardest one.

[Gagsquet]

What a draw Luckerer at it again.

[Looner]

Yeah man, it's as if RN's playing.

[Fireballer]

who cares Fed is not losing before QF at Grand Slams anyway