Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines - Page 3 - MensTennisForums.com

MensTennisForums.com

MenstennisForums.com is the premier Men's Tennis forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!

Reply

Old 10-04-2012, 08:33 PM   #31
country flag buddyholly
RAVE ON
 
buddyholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 14,064
buddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines

Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21 View Post
didn't know about that.

the more i read about churchill the more i get convinced that he was pig. his dimissive approach to human lives is shocking.

hard to believe how a person like that can be regarded as a hero in what westerners claim to be a highly progressive place. the guy was on par with the terrorists the west claims to despise.
He saved Western civilization from Nazis or Communists or both. What more do you want? Oh wait...............
__________________
JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY
buddyholly is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 10-04-2012, 08:35 PM   #32
country flag TigerTim
Registered User
 
TigerTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Bristol, England
Posts: 10,592
TigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond reputeTigerTim has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines

war is war. Mers el Kebier was done in desperate times, do you realise the situation the British were in at that point?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiebreak100 View Post
A dishwasher has more personality than Sampras.

Quote:
Originally Posted by SliceAce View Post
As for Mugray, what can be said? A disgusting human being, and awful player, and a choking pushing mug. He looks like a kemo patient, bald spots, hairless legs, pasty blotchy skin, busted teeth, and an ugly, snarling face. Typical antics all came out in this match: faking injuries, grimacing and cursing, trying to peg Fed, trying to start drama, undeserved final based on an exhausted old man and a joke draw.

I'm no Fakervic fan but he needs to save tennis, sadly tree trunk legs will be fresh. Interesting he's never questioned...
TigerTim is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-04-2012, 09:14 PM   #33
country flag The Prince
Registered User
 
The Prince's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Hiding
Posts: 11,817
The Prince has a reputation beyond reputeThe Prince has a reputation beyond reputeThe Prince has a reputation beyond reputeThe Prince has a reputation beyond reputeThe Prince has a reputation beyond reputeThe Prince has a reputation beyond reputeThe Prince has a reputation beyond reputeThe Prince has a reputation beyond reputeThe Prince has a reputation beyond reputeThe Prince has a reputation beyond reputeThe Prince has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines

Classic Abraxas thread.
The Prince is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2012, 06:16 PM   #34
country flag Echoes
Registered User
 
Echoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Age: 31
Posts: 1,902
Echoes has a reputation beyond reputeEchoes has a reputation beyond reputeEchoes has a reputation beyond reputeEchoes has a reputation beyond reputeEchoes has a reputation beyond reputeEchoes has a reputation beyond reputeEchoes has a reputation beyond reputeEchoes has a reputation beyond reputeEchoes has a reputation beyond reputeEchoes has a reputation beyond reputeEchoes has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddyholly View Post
He saved Western civilization [...] Communists or both. What more do you want? Oh wait...............
I have just shown that he SURRENDERED to them ..

Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerTim
war is war. Mers el Kebier was done in desperate times, do you realise the situation the British were in at that point?
So you mean that Sir Winston could easily lose his mind in desperate times? I don't think it fits with the character. I think he was still clear-minded enough to know what he was doing.


He could easily have destroyed the Italian fleet at that time. So why the French? He had Darlan's word. Of course, Darlan would later collaborate but that was in retaliation for Mers-El-Kebir (no excuse, of course though), against the will of his government. And despite that fact, Roosevelt negotiated with him after Torch (1942).
Echoes is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-05-2012, 07:11 PM   #35
country flag scoobs
Anastasia Komananov, KGB
 
scoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 36
Posts: 53,454
scoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines

Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21 View Post
When talking about famines, the name of Stalin usually pops up as the monster of history responsible for the deaths of millions, famously with his purges but also for his 'man made' famines, in particular Ukranian Holodomor which many recognise as a deliberate attempt to destroy a population (i.e. genocide). arguments still rage about whether this was the case, or whether it was simply an effect of Stalin's policies, but I don't think anyone can argue Stalin had little regard for the lives of millions.

So why are the famines in India and Ireland (among others) done by the British empire not regarded in such fashion? There were similar policies, similar hatreds for the subject populations, similar exporting of food despite widespread famine and similar leaders who directly ordered this, Winston Churchill being one who is responsible for the death of millions and yet is regarded to this day with high acclaim in Britain.

in the west, most people like to point their accusing fingers at others by they're not very prone to take a look on their mirrors. hypocrisy, as i've said on countless ocassions, is rampant.
History is written by the victors and so the shameful behaviour of the British Empire in its colonial and even post-colonial eras has not been subjected to the sort of scrutiny it deserves.
scoobs is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 11:26 AM   #36
country flag Sophitia36
Registered User
 
Sophitia36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Age: 29
Posts: 2,079
Sophitia36 has a reputation beyond reputeSophitia36 has a reputation beyond reputeSophitia36 has a reputation beyond reputeSophitia36 has a reputation beyond reputeSophitia36 has a reputation beyond reputeSophitia36 has a reputation beyond reputeSophitia36 has a reputation beyond reputeSophitia36 has a reputation beyond reputeSophitia36 has a reputation beyond reputeSophitia36 has a reputation beyond reputeSophitia36 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines

Quote:
Originally Posted by scoobs View Post
History is written by the victors and so the shameful behaviour of the British Empire in its colonial and even post-colonial eras has not been subjected to the sort of scrutiny it deserves.
Well... the British have lost their empire so they are not really the victors anymore, I think.

As I said in my post about Ireland, I think it's wrong to say that colonial history has not been scrutinized and exposed. At least, in the academic world it has been subjected to intense scrutiny. I know lots of people who work on post-colonialism, slavery, the British Empire, the Irish question and so on.
Maybe it's not spreading to the "outside" world yet but it has definitely been studied extensively and very critically.
Sophitia36 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 12:50 PM   #37
country flag scoobs
Anastasia Komananov, KGB
 
scoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 36
Posts: 53,454
scoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophitia36 View Post
Well... the British have lost their empire so they are not really the victors anymore, I think.

As I said in my post about Ireland, I think it's wrong to say that colonial history has not been scrutinized and exposed. At least, in the academic world it has been subjected to intense scrutiny. I know lots of people who work on post-colonialism, slavery, the British Empire, the Irish question and so on.
Maybe it's not spreading to the "outside" world yet but it has definitely been studied extensively and very critically.
Indeed, but when you win the wars you fight, and your empire ends up being dismantled relatively peacefully, there's no need for the populace at large to confront and come to terms with the horrible things done by their leaders in their name. You don't need a truth and reconciliation commission, so you don't have one - you keep moving forward and, apart from in fusty academic texts that few people read, never look at the reality of what was done, only the triumphalist soundbites that are used to reinforce the national identity.

The average Britain has no idea that it was we who invented the concentration camp, which is pretty shameful.
scoobs is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 01:46 PM   #38
country flag abraxas21
Registered User
 
abraxas21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Age: 28
Posts: 12,555
abraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines

Quote:
Originally Posted by buddyholly View Post
He saved Western civilization from Nazis or Communists or both. What more do you want? Oh wait...............
he saved fuck all.

as much as the yanks and the brits try to put themselves at the head of WWII victory in hollywood films and the like, the truth is that the nazi war effort received its major blow in the eastern front where the great patriotic war was won by the soviets. that was the event the tipped off the balance in favour of the allies. before that, the brits were mainly defending whatever they could from the german bombs falling in their cities.

as for communism, it didn't add up to much. but i do reckon that if it weren't for the USA and to a lesser degree Britain, Stalin would have probably taken most of western europe, including the whole of germany. the clash of powers served to equalize things and senteced the basis for an iron wall. the americans and particularly the brits couldn't care less for the euro eastern countries, they've always looked down one them on way or another, so i guess it was a cost they could take.
__________________
abraxas21 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 02:02 PM   #39
country flag abraxas21
Registered User
 
abraxas21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Age: 28
Posts: 12,555
abraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines

Quote:
Originally Posted by TigerTim View Post
war is war. Mers el Kebier was done in desperate times, do you realise the situation the British were in at that point?
i guess it could be argued in his favour that that incident in particular along with his insistance to send working class people to fight in gallipoli in WWI along with his endorsment and participation in the british concentration camps for boers in south africa where thousands of women and children died along with the hundreds of thousands (if not millions as it is accepted) who perished in india because of his scorch-and-burn tactics could be understood in the context of war and thus, in some way, be justified.

i guess that's what many in the UK think.

Then again, I have a different view. Churchill was conservative in many of his policies and wanted to preserve british power. He looked the world in terms of what's better for british interests, as any leader should when looking after his nation. Then again, he was able to stop at nothing to get his objectives. His little regard for life was always abysmal, in part because he saw people's lives as means to a greater end.

in winstons' case, the great kinks' song "victoria" fits well.
__________________
abraxas21 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 02:08 PM   #40
country flag lalit
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 32
Posts: 221
lalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines

I will just put this out there. I was born in India and am ethnically 100% Indian though I left India at the age of 8. My grandfather often said that life under British rule was better than when India was under socialist rule. That's how bad socialism is.
abraxas21 you can always move to Cuba or North Korea if you feel America, UK ,Israel, capitalism is so bad. Stop trolling here.
__________________
Richard Gasquet Rafael Nadal
My two faves

______________________________

~♠ Gasqueteers ♠~

all for one, one for all
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
lalit is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 02:08 PM   #41
country flag abraxas21
Registered User
 
abraxas21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Age: 28
Posts: 12,555
abraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines

Quote:
Originally Posted by scoobs View Post
The average Britain has no idea that it was we who invented the concentration camp, which is pretty shameful.
indeed.

here's a good article by the independent who exposes churchill for what he really was. a racist megalomaniac borderline sociopath who is responsible for the death of millions.

Quote:
Winston Churchill is rightly remembered for leading Britain through her finest hour – but what if he also led the country through her most shameful hour? What if, in addition to rousing a nation to save the world from the Nazis, he fought for a raw white supremacism and a concentration camp network of his own? This question burns through Richard Toye's new history, Churchill's Empire, and is even seeping into the Oval Office.

George W Bush left a bust of Churchill near his desk in the White House, in an attempt to associate himself with the war leader's heroic stand against fascism. Barack Obama had it returned to Britain. It's not hard to guess why: his Kenyan grandfather, Hussein Onyango Obama, was imprisoned without trial for two years and was tortured on Churchill's watch, for resisting Churchill's empire.

Can these clashing Churchills be reconciled? Do we live, at the same time, in the world he helped to save, and the world he helped to trash? Toye, one of Britain's smartest young historians, has tried to pick through these questions dispassionately – and he should lead us, at last and at least, to a more mature conversation about our greatest national icon.

Churchill was born in 1874 into a Britain that was washing the map pink, at the cost of washing distant nations blood red. Victoria had just been crowned Empress of India, and the scramble for Africa was only a few years away. At Harrow School and then Sandhurst, he was told a simple story: the superior white man was conquering the primitive, dark-skinned natives, and bringing them the benefits of civilisation. As soon as he could, Churchill charged off to take his part in "a lot of jolly little wars against barbarous peoples". In the Swat valley, now part of Pakistan, he experienced, fleetingly, a crack of doubt. He realised that the local population was fighting back because of "the presence of British troops in lands the local people considered their own," just as Britain would if she were invaded. But Churchill soon suppressed this thought, deciding instead they were merely deranged jihadists whose violence was explained by a "strong aboriginal propensity to kill".

He gladly took part in raids that laid waste to whole valleys, destroying houses and burning crops. He then sped off to help reconquer the Sudan, where he bragged that he personally shot at least three "savages".

The young Churchill charged through imperial atrocities, defending each in turn. When concentration camps were built in South Africa, for white Boers, he said they produced "the minimum of suffering". The death toll was almost 28,000, and when at least 115,000 black Africans were likewise swept into British camps, where 14,000 died, he wrote only of his "irritation that Kaffirs should be allowed to fire on white men". Later, he boasted of his experiences there: "That was before war degenerated. It was great fun galloping about."

Then as an MP he demanded a rolling programme of more conquests, based on his belief that "the Aryan stock is bound to triumph". There seems to have been an odd cognitive dissonance in his view of the "natives". In some of his private correspondence, he appears to really believe they are helpless children who will "willingly, naturally, gratefully include themselves within the golden circle of an ancient crown".

But when they defied this script, Churchill demanded they be crushed with extreme force. As Colonial Secretary in the 1920s, he unleashed the notorious Black and Tan thugs on Ireland's Catholic civilians, and when the Kurds rebelled against British rule, he said: "I am strongly in favour of using poisoned gas against uncivilised tribes...[It] would spread a lively terror."

Of course, it's easy to dismiss any criticism of these actions as anachronistic. Didn't everybody think that way then? One of the most striking findings of Toye's research is that they really didn't: even at the time, Churchill was seen as at the most brutal and brutish end of the British imperialist spectrum. Prime Minister Stanley Baldwin was warned by Cabinet colleagues not to appoint him because his views were so antedeluvian. Even his startled doctor, Lord Moran, said of other races: "Winston thinks only of the colour of their skin."

Many of his colleagues thought Churchill was driven by a deep loathing of democracy for anyone other than the British and a tiny clique of supposedly superior races. This was clearest in his attitude to India. When Mahatma Gandhi launched his campaign of peaceful resistance, Churchill raged that he "ought to be lain bound hand and foot at the gates of Delhi, and then trampled on by an enormous elephant with the new Viceroy seated on its back." As the resistance swelled, he announced: "I hate Indians. They are a beastly people with a beastly religion." This hatred killed. To give just one, major, example, in 1943 a famine broke out in Bengal, caused – as the Nobel Prize-winning economist Amartya Sen has proved – by the imperial policies of the British. Up to 3 million people starved to death while British officials begged Churchill to direct food supplies to the region. He bluntly refused. He raged that it was their own fault for "breeding like rabbits". At other times, he said the plague was "merrily" culling the population.

Skeletal, half-dead people were streaming into the cities and dying on the streets, but Churchill – to the astonishment of his staff – had only jeers for them. This rather undermines the claims that Churchill's imperialism was motivated only by an altruistic desire to elevate the putatively lower races.

Hussein Onyango Obama is unusual among Churchill's victims only in one respect: his story has been rescued from the slipstream of history, because his grandson ended up as President of the US. Churchill believed that Kenya's fertile highlands should be the preserve of the white settlers, and approved the clearing out of the local "blackamoors". He saw the local Kikuyu as "brutish children". When they rebelled under Churchill's post-war premiership, some 150,000 of them were forced at gunpoint into detention camps – later dubbed "Britain's gulag" by Pulitzer-prize winning historian, Professor Caroline Elkins. She studied the detention camps for five years for her remarkable book Britain's Gulag: The Brutal End of Empire in Kenya, explains the tactics adopted under Churchill to crush the local drive for independence. "Electric shock was widely used, as well as cigarettes and fire," she writes. "The screening teams whipped, shot, burned, and mutilated Mau Mau suspects." Hussein Onyango Obama never truly recovered from the torture he endured.

Many of the wounds Churchill inflicted have still not healed: you can find them on the front pages any day of the week. He is the man who invented Iraq, locking together three conflicting peoples behind arbitrary borders that have been bleeding ever since. He is the Colonial Secretary who offered the Over-Promised Land to both the Jews and the Arabs – although he seems to have privately felt racist contempt for both. He jeered at the Palestinians as "barbaric hoards who ate little but camel dung," while he was appalled that the Israelis "take it for granted that the local population will be cleared out to suit their convenience".

True, occasionally Churchill did become queasy about some of the most extreme acts of the Empire. He fretted at the slaughter of women and children, and cavilled at the Amritsar massacre of 1919. Toye tries to present these doubts as evidence of moderation – yet they almost never seem to have led Churchill to change his actions. If you are determined to rule people by force against their will, you can hardly be surprised when atrocities occur. Rule Britannia would inexorably produce a Cruel Britannia.

So how can the two be reconciled? Was Churchill's moral opposition to Nazism a charade, masking the fact he was merely trying to defend the British Empire from a rival?

The US civil rights leader Richard B. Moore, quoted by Toye, said it was "a rare and fortunate coincidence" that at that moment "the vital interests of the British Empire [coincided] with those of the great overwhelming majority of mankind". But this might be too soft in its praise. If Churchill had only been interested in saving the Empire, he could probably have cut a deal with Hitler. No: he had a deeper repugnance for Nazism than that. He may have been a thug, but he knew a greater thug when he saw one – and we may owe our freedom today to this wrinkle in history.

This, in turn, led to the great irony of Churchill's life. In resisting the Nazis, he produced some of the richest prose-poetry in defence of freedom and democracy ever written. It was a cheque he didn't want black or Asian people to cash – but they refused to accept that the Bank of Justice was empty. As the Ghanaian nationalist Kwame Nkrumah wrote: "All the fair, brave words spoken about freedom that had been broadcast to the four corners of the earth took seed and grew where they had not been intended." Churchill lived to see democrats across Britain's dominions and colonies – from nationalist leader Aung San in Burma to Jawarlal Nehru in India – use his own intoxicating words against him.

Ultimately, the words of the great and glorious Churchill who resisted dictatorship overwhelmed the works of the cruel and cramped Churchill who tried to impose it on the darker-skinned peoples of the world. The fact that we now live in a world where a free and independent India is a superpower eclipsing Britain, and a grandson of the Kikuyu "savages" is the most powerful man in the world, is a repudiation of Churchill at his ugliest – and a sweet, ironic victory for Churchill at his best.

For updates on this issue and others, follow Johann at www.twitter.com/johannhari101

'Churchill's Empire' is published by Macmillan (£25). To order a copy for the special price of £22.50 (free P&P) call Independent Books Direct on 08430 600 030, or visit www.independentbooksdirect.co.uk
__________________

Last edited by abraxas21 : 10-06-2012 at 04:52 PM.
abraxas21 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 02:19 PM   #42
country flag abraxas21
Registered User
 
abraxas21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Age: 28
Posts: 12,555
abraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond reputeabraxas21 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines

Quote:
Originally Posted by lalit View Post
abraxas21 you can always move to Cuba or North Korea if you feel America, UK ,Israel, capitalism is so bad. Stop trolling here.
why would i move to cuba or NK when im not cuban or north korean

your granddaddy's story about india is nice but i think india in general, particularly bengal, has a better understanding of the situation. if british rule was a so great, i guess ghandi wouldn't be famous.
__________________

Last edited by abraxas21 : 10-06-2012 at 02:41 PM.
abraxas21 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 02:22 PM   #43
country flag lalit
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Age: 32
Posts: 221
lalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond reputelalit has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines

Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21 View Post
why would i move to cuba or NK when im not cuban or north korean

your daddy's story about india is nice but i think india in general, particularly bengal, has a better understanding of the situation. if british rule was a so great, i guess ghandi wouldn't be famous.
probably i phrased it incorrectly. my grandfather didnt say british rule was great, my grandfather said that socialism was worse. saying that british rule was better than socialism doesn't mean british rule was great.
as for gandhi he is probably the most overrated person in the world. someone like subhash chandra bose or sardar patel or bhagat singh are better leaders in the independence movement than him.
__________________
Richard Gasquet Rafael Nadal
My two faves

______________________________

~♠ Gasqueteers ♠~

all for one, one for all
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
lalit is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 04:11 PM   #44
country flag buddyholly
RAVE ON
 
buddyholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 14,064
buddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines

Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21 View Post
why would i move to cuba or NK when im not cuban or north korean
Why confused? Millions of people migrate in search of a society that better suits their aspirations.
__________________
JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY
buddyholly is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-06-2012, 04:36 PM   #45
country flag buddyholly
RAVE ON
 
buddyholly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 14,064
buddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond reputebuddyholly has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Stalin's famines and the British Empire's famines

Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21 View Post

your granddaddy's story about india is nice
""Grandaddy?''

Once again the rapier-witted abraxas unleashes a withering put-down.
__________________
JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY
buddyholly is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios