USO wildcards? - MensTennisForums.com

MensTennisForums.com

MenstennisForums.com is the premier Men's Tennis forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!

Reply

Old 07-15-2014, 07:34 AM   #1
country flag Kateoz
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 94
Kateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond repute
Question USO wildcards?

So I'm curious about what people think the criteria TA will use for allocating its wildcards. I haven't followed this process in the past, so interested in perspectives. But on the face of it..

I saw someone suggest Tomic, and he will obviously want it, and I suppose good results over the next few weeks could make his case. But equally, he had the chances to be main draw and blew them, and could have gone to Newport to get his ranking back, but didn't...So why not make him go through qualifying and show he has his head back in the right place?

And wouldn't TA be more interested in using it to help a player who is developing rather than one who has had his chances?

In which case Luke Savile would surely be top contender, given strong Wimbledon performance getting through qualifying, and steadily improving ranking (currently sits at 8 in under 21 group, immediately after Tomic!)?

But also presumably JP Smith and Duckworth (higher ranking but slower progress? in the mix?

And is there a qualifying wc on offer?
Kateoz is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 07-15-2014, 08:02 AM   #2
country flag Ausie
Registered User
 
Ausie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ukraine
Age: 25
Posts: 5,670
Ausie has a reputation beyond reputeAusie has a reputation beyond reputeAusie has a reputation beyond reputeAusie has a reputation beyond reputeAusie has a reputation beyond reputeAusie has a reputation beyond reputeAusie has a reputation beyond reputeAusie has a reputation beyond reputeAusie has a reputation beyond reputeAusie has a reputation beyond reputeAusie has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: USO wildcards?

Duckworth, Smith definitely not. Tomic or Kokkinakis. I think Bernard has more chances.
__________________
Rusty - always # 1 in my heart

Lleyton Hewitt


Gael Monfils - Aleksandr Dolgopolov - Juan Martin Del Potro - Nick Kyrgios - Jason Kubler - Serhiy Stakhovsky - Gianni Mina - Martin Klizan - Benjamin Mitchell - Borna Coric - Francis Tiafoe - Noah Rubin
Ausie is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 08:35 AM   #3
country flag Chris.
Registered User
 
Chris.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,025
Chris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: USO wildcards?

The main draw one will go to Tomic and Kokkinakis will get a QWC if needed. Almost 100% sure.
Chris. is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 08:44 AM   #4
country flag scotthongkong
Registered User
 
scotthongkong's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Age: 52
Posts: 1,070
scotthongkong has a reputation beyond reputescotthongkong has a reputation beyond reputescotthongkong has a reputation beyond reputescotthongkong has a reputation beyond reputescotthongkong has a reputation beyond reputescotthongkong has a reputation beyond reputescotthongkong has a reputation beyond reputescotthongkong has a reputation beyond reputescotthongkong has a reputation beyond reputescotthongkong has a reputation beyond reputescotthongkong has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: USO wildcards?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris. View Post
The main draw one will go to Tomic and Kokkinakis will get a QWC if needed. Almost 100% sure.
I agree.
scotthongkong is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 10:22 AM   #5
country flag aussie_fan
Registered User
 
aussie_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 3,019
aussie_fan has a reputation beyond reputeaussie_fan has a reputation beyond reputeaussie_fan has a reputation beyond reputeaussie_fan has a reputation beyond reputeaussie_fan has a reputation beyond reputeaussie_fan has a reputation beyond reputeaussie_fan has a reputation beyond reputeaussie_fan has a reputation beyond reputeaussie_fan has a reputation beyond reputeaussie_fan has a reputation beyond reputeaussie_fan has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: USO wildcards?

Duckworth arguably deserves it (he keeps qualifying for the slams) but needs more results. Tomic will probably get it though.
aussie_fan is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 10:24 AM   #6
country flag RustyOz
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,042
RustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: USO wildcards?

I agree with Chris.
Tomic is a DC player, and has come off surgery on his hips. Deserves a chance to get back to his previous playing level, regain his confidence.
__________________
Hewitt, Tomic, Matosevic, Groth, Jones, JP Smith, Matty Reid, Barton, Duckworth, Kubler, Kyrgios, Bolt, Polansky and James Ward
Go Aussie
RustyOz is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 10:51 AM   #7
country flag The Lad
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 34
The Lad is on a distinguished road
Default Re: USO wildcards?

The other issue with Tomic though is he comes with so much negative publicity brought on by himself or family. Even allowing for the surgery he shouldn't have fallen that far. Its time for his antics and drama to go unrewarded and for Tomic to demonstrate he's prepared to graft and to do some tough things. If he can do that for the Hard Court season he can have one for the AO.

I've said elsewhere right now Saville is a genuine mover in the rankings and making a bit of an impact and ready to push toward the top 100 now and should be the player looked at for the USO spot.
The Lad is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 11:03 AM   #8
country flag Kateoz
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 94
Kateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: USO wildcards?

Quote:
Tomic is a DC player, and has come off surgery on his hips. Deserves a chance to get back to his previous playing level, regain his confidence.
Wouldn't playing through qualies (which should be a breeze for him if he really interested in getting back). And more than bad publicity - consistent misjudgment about when and how to play!

Also, its a big payday, Tomic surely doesn't need it (getting the sack from IMG notwithstanding!).
Kateoz is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 11:40 AM   #9
country flag jmf07
Registered User
 
jmf07's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Age: 23
Posts: 4,250
jmf07 has a reputation beyond reputejmf07 has a reputation beyond reputejmf07 has a reputation beyond reputejmf07 has a reputation beyond reputejmf07 has a reputation beyond reputejmf07 has a reputation beyond reputejmf07 has a reputation beyond reputejmf07 has a reputation beyond reputejmf07 has a reputation beyond reputejmf07 has a reputation beyond reputejmf07 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: USO wildcards?

Tough to see Tomic not getting it IMO. Good chance he will be top 100 by the time it comes to announce the wildcard so you may as well give the wildcard to the guy who would have made the cut had the entry list been made at that time. They could make a big statement and force him to go through Qualies but now is the critical time when you should be supporting him and giving him a wildcard. A lot of players need wake up calls and this may be it for Tomic so we should give him the opportunity to rebuild. Taking the WC in Bogota is a very positive sign. If he is still in this position next year then it becomes a different story but for now he should receive the wildcard. Why invest a ton of resources into a guy if your going to abandon him when he goes through a lean period but still has potential?
__________________
Baker (USA) - Bedene (SLO) - Bellucci (BRA) - Berta (SWE) - Cuevas (URU) - Domijan (USA) - Ebden (AUS) - Estrella (DOM) - Grigelis (LTU) - Guccione (AUS) - Heliovaara (FIN) - Kavcic (SLO) - King (BAH) - Kontinen (FIN) - Kubler (AUS) - Lajovic (SRB) - Matosevic (AUS) - McGee (IRE) - Millman (AUS) - Mitchell (AUS) - Nielsen (DEN) - Nieminen (FIN) - Paire (FRA) - Udomchoke (THA)
jmf07 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 12:37 PM   #10
country flag Chris.
Registered User
 
Chris.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,025
Chris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond reputeChris. has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: USO wildcards?

Luke isn't quite ready yet. He has a poor overseas challenger record. If Tomic doesn't produce any results I would say Luke would be a chance but he would have to at least win one of the challenger tournaments he is playing.
Chris. is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 08:07 PM   #11
country flag Kateoz
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 94
Kateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: USO wildcards?

I'm still not sure I understand the criteria TA are using or you think they should be using to allocate it. Is it mainly about player development, spreading around the largesse, rewarding good performance, or other factors?

If it was your own tournament, I guess you'd consider giving a wc to a player who had dropped down the ranks due to injury so didn't get entry at the time, or had some name recognition so ticket sales. But do exactly the same considerations apply to the reciprocal wcs?

Quote:
Why invest a ton of resources into a guy if your going to abandon him when he goes through a lean period but still has potential?
There is an economic concept called sunk costs, viz you can't keep throwing away good money away after bad. Injury or not, he has had several pretty disgraceful performances on court this year, can't see why Australia would want to give him anything until there is a clear demonstration that it won't happen again (dumping his coach would be a good start). And its not as if he has a lot of points to defend from last year's USO.

Moreover, seems to me a bit hard to know how much Tomic's current performance reflects his injury recovery, and how much just lack of effort/interest - his numbers do reflect the kind of level he was at last yr too on the face of it, a long way down from his peak in 2012.

Chris - Take your point on Saville, though Wimbledon performance surely a bit of a turnaround on that front?
Kateoz is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2014, 09:27 PM   #12
country flag RustyOz
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,042
RustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: USO wildcards?

Not sure anybody understands the criteria TA use in selecting Wild Cards. Been that way for a long time... they flip-flop a lot from player development, to player reward, to just giving it to some-one.
__________________
Hewitt, Tomic, Matosevic, Groth, Jones, JP Smith, Matty Reid, Barton, Duckworth, Kubler, Kyrgios, Bolt, Polansky and James Ward
Go Aussie
RustyOz is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2014, 11:02 AM   #13
country flag Kateoz
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 94
Kateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: USO wildcards?

Ok, no wonder I couldn't work it out! I guess all will be revealed soonish.
Kateoz is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2014, 09:52 PM   #14
country flag RustyOz
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Australia
Posts: 2,042
RustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond reputeRustyOz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: USO wildcards?

I personnaly think the USA do it so much better, by setting criteria for the awarding of the WC to French Open, or USA or Oz Open, in that they measure player's performances over a set No. of preceding tournaments, and the best performer (in accumulation of ATP points) gets the WC. It is a bit flawed in that it is sometimes draw dependant (good/bad) and that it can dictate which tournaments players have to play. Also, the US says a heap more tournaments in their home country (unlike in OZ).
But at least it is a transparent process
__________________
Hewitt, Tomic, Matosevic, Groth, Jones, JP Smith, Matty Reid, Barton, Duckworth, Kubler, Kyrgios, Bolt, Polansky and James Ward
Go Aussie
RustyOz is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2014, 10:36 PM   #15
country flag Kateoz
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 94
Kateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond reputeKateoz has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: USO wildcards?

Agreed. I hadn't realised until I read this piece in The Conversation how much TA's Govt funding is dependent on someone(s) winning a slam:

http://theconversation.com/in-pickin...bilities-29101

Basically argues that overall, Government funding for sport is overly focused on creating world champions, potentially at the expense of building a broader field of players. The example in the article is the impact on parasoccer, but equally relevant to skewing of funding within a sport like tennis.

Basically, each sport is assessed against targets of potential gold, silver and bronze medals, translated for tennis into slams. Currently tennis is assessed as "progressing", or a score of 2/possible 5 (excelling), and funded accordingly.

So incentive is perhaps to give all the dollars to those likely to make the top soon (even if they are a bit of a bad risk!), rather than recognise the field of players who can potentially make a living out of the sport?
Kateoz is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios