[Clay Death]

Originally Posted by JolánGagó

Llodra said Wimby slower than RG

if he really said that then he has to be the most clueless clown on the tour.

get a clue frenchie.

[*Ljubica*]

Originally Posted by lord miura

If I could buy that duffle bag with gold lining I would use it every day

Martin You have way too much good taste for that I'm sure. That bag may be expensive (I don't doubt it) - but to me it's just far too flashy and ostentatious, and thus totally classless - ugh

[Pfloyd]

Well truth is, Wimby is so easy for Fed, he can actually afford to make it a Fashion show.

[habibko]

Originally Posted by Clay Death

if he really said that then he has to be the most clueless clown on the tour.

get a clue frenchie.

affirmative, the balls are obviously slower than the balls used in RG, but the overall speed looks much faster than RG that's for sure, I don't know what that guy is smoking, but it must be good

[Arkulari]

Del Potro has the game, but against Roger on Wimbledon, there should be an almost inhumane effort on any player's part to beat him

look at Wimbledon last year, Roger was playing his worst tennis since 2002 I think and yet it took Rafa 5 sets to beat him, Roger is playing way way way better this year, so the odds of an upset get smaller and smaller by the minute

[miura]

Originally Posted by *Ljubica*

Martin You have way too much good taste for that I'm sure. That bag may be expensive (I don't doubt it) - but to me it's just far too flashy and ostentatious, and thus totally classless - ugh

Haha, you are underestimating my snobbishness Rose

Earlier today I was driving around town in my Mercedes convertible, dressed only in tight white clothes listening to this at full volume:



I admit I felt slightly conspicuous

[Pfloyd]

Originally Posted by MrsFedex

Del Potro has the game, but against Roger on Wimbledon, there should be an almost inhumane effort on any player's part to beat him

look at Wimbledon last year, Roger was playing his worst tennis since 2002 I think and yet it took Rafa 5 sets to beat him, Roger is playing way way way better this year, so the odds of an upset get smaller and smaller by the minute

I think aside the 5th set, 2007 Wimbledon was played at a higher level.

Roger played as good as any other time on Grass and Rafa ALMOST got it, but that injury in that final did not help him.

In short, it seems only Rafa can beat Fed on grass.

[Clay Death]

Originally Posted by MrsFedex

CD: if Roger reaches the final, it's a done deal, he doesn't lose on GS finals against anyone not named Rafael Nadal

Muzza isn't looking as sharp as he did during the HC season, he even lost a TB
Djoker is having issues with his serve return, so the odds of him beating Roger if they both reach SF is low, you can beat Roger 152415145 times on a row on MS and MM tournaments but on Slams is a whole different animal

negative.

if murray makes it to the final, we have ourselves a match. lets not forget that murray has beaten fed 5 times in a row if you count that exo in abu dhabi uness i am mistaken.

that too has to be factored in. murray will have the backing of the crowd as well.

be scared. be very very scared.

lastly, did the folks forget that murray is vastly improved over the last 6 months or so.

i did NOT say he was going to win. i said we have ourselves a match and that murray could have his chances.

[habibko]

great rally

[miura]

Alex, please don't mention Armada here!!! Someone could get the wrong ideas.. I did the mistake last night and had to postpone my meal for atleast 40 minutes to get my apptetite back

[miura]

Originally Posted by habibko

great rally

Who are these who are so desperate to put things on youtube they actually film their own TV?

[habibko]

Originally Posted by Clay Death

negative.

if murray makes it to the final, we have ourselves a match. lets not forget that murray has beaten fed 5 times in a row if you count that exo in abu dhabi uness i am mistaken.

that too has to be factored in. murray will have the backing of the crowd as well.

be scared. be very very scared.

lastly, did the folks forget that murray is vastly improved over the last 6 months or so.

i did NOT say he was going to win. i said we have ourselves a match and that murray could have his chances.

affirmative, that has the potential of being the match of the year, the buildup is as close to 2008 final as it gets, no way it's going to be a straight sets match in my book.

but I still trust Fed to win that match, although I think Murray has a LONG way to go to make the final.

[Arkulari]

Originally Posted by Clay Death

negative.

if murray makes it to the final, we have ourselves a match. lets not forget that murray has beaten fed 5 times in a row if you count that exo in abu dhabi uness i am mistaken.

that too has to be factored in. murray will have the backing of the crowd as well.

be scared. be very very scared.

lastly, did the folks forget that murray is vastly improved over the last 6 months or so.

i did NOT say he was going to win. i said we have ourselves a match and that murray could have his chances.

CD: like I said, you can beat Roger 1515454584 times on a row on MS and MM tournaments, but on Slams is a whole different matter, it takes a huge effort on anyone to beat him, specially in Wimbledon

I'm not saying Muzza doesn't have chances, but he has to improve his game NOW, because Roger isn't even playing at 70% and is cruising through the draw, if the final were tomorrow, Roger will win in straights

it's up for the other guys to step up for the challenge

right now I only see Del Potro at the same level, hopefully Muzza and Djoker will improve every passing match, I love the drama

[Pfloyd]

I hope ESPN2 shows the Delpo Hewitt match tomorrow, that looks to be quite good.

[Dimitra]

Originally Posted by JolánGagó

Llodra said Wimby slower than RG

wow really?!?
He was the one to play so he knows more than any of us could..