I haven't read the article yet but heard it's pretty bad - basically Roger's win has an '*' next to it because he didn't have to beat Nadal - and when he did beat Nadal in Madrid it's only because Nadal was tired.
Thank you Stanimal for taking out the trash at AO!
funny at the date of the article... it's dated in the future...
What a piece of trash...Thanks for posting.
"Champions aren’t made in gyms. Champions are made from something they have deep inside them a desire, a dream, a vision. They have to have the skill and the will. But the will must be stronger than the skill.”- Muhammad Ali“
lol,..nadal humbled federer only on FO 08. that was nadal in his prime and rog with probs....but Federer had humbled Nadal many more times.. he has been winning sets vs rafa with love!! Even on Clay (hamburg 07) after 80+ winning streak with no loses... roger humbled him with 2-6 6-2 6-0 !! also wimb 06, MC 07(shanghai) ,.. So stop whining about "humbling.." I am sure, if nadal was righthanded he would have won roger max 2-3 times(only on clay ) bcoz he cant topspin so hard with bh to bh.... so anyways.. Nadal is player forged in blacksmith to play Roger..And still he never dominated over rog..
Try finding the word 'Brilliant' in dictionary,and you'll find the picture of Roger Federer next to it.