 |
|
12-07-2005, 04:26 AM
|
#166
|
|
Scavenger Hunter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: swimming across the pacific ocean
Posts: 31,857
|
Re: Nat = Tootsie Roll |: (p.s. Kimmay is fuckin awesome!) chat thread
hmm..i'm looking at it again it's the y that's got me stumped  it looks calculus-ish.  ah well. sorry preet 
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dowa, on a theory proposed by Annie
the connection between his brain and his body has been restored!
|
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
12-07-2005, 04:32 AM
|
#167
|
|
Vamos Mandy :)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Looking for Andy's forehand with Sarah and Re...
Posts: 85,832
|
Re: Nat = Tootsie Roll |: (p.s. Kimmay is fuckin awesome!) chat thread
I don't like fish, Noelle, but I agree that it should be sugar-free
And yes, I do like Fish
Here you go Jiat 
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 04:35 AM
|
#168
|
|
Scavenger Hunter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: swimming across the pacific ocean
Posts: 31,857
|
Re: Nat = Tootsie Roll |: (p.s. Kimmay is fuckin awesome!) chat thread
mmmmmmmmm.....lecker 
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dowa, on a theory proposed by Annie
the connection between his brain and his body has been restored!
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 10:25 AM
|
#169
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: South Jersayy (:
Posts: 7,736
|
Re: Nat = Tootsie Roll |: (p.s. Kimmay is fuckin awesome!) chat thread
thanks for the help nat and roo 
but nat....the answer is 2000 :S 
__________________
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 11:38 AM
|
#170
|
|
Scavenger Hunter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: swimming across the pacific ocean
Posts: 31,857
|
Re: Nat = Tootsie Roll |: (p.s. Kimmay is fuckin awesome!) chat thread
what answer's 2000?
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dowa, on a theory proposed by Annie
the connection between his brain and his body has been restored!
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 11:38 AM
|
#171
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 5,475
|
Re: Nat = Tootsie Roll |: (p.s. Kimmay is fuckin awesome!) chat thread
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by andyroxmysox12191
thanks for the help nat and roo 
but nat....the answer is 2000 :S 
|
Mani, use what Jiat did but P should be in thousands, so you start with P = 16,560 and then when you move this to the other side of the equation it become -9810 (=6750-16560). Solve this and you get 30, which added to 1970 gives 2000.
And, I'm lost on Q63 too. Do you have the formula to calculate a volume?
And, yes, I'm a total geek.
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 11:45 AM
|
#172
|
|
Scavenger Hunter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: swimming across the pacific ocean
Posts: 31,857
|
Re: Nat = Tootsie Roll |: (p.s. Kimmay is fuckin awesome!) chat thread
woops. lol...i was thinking 2 millenia was kinda off target  shows how great my maths is LMAO.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dowa, on a theory proposed by Annie
the connection between his brain and his body has been restored!
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 12:14 PM
|
#173
|
|
Mom 2 2 Beauties
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On the deuce side, Looking to Come In
Posts: 11,897
|
Re: Nat = Tootsie Roll |: (p.s. Kimmay is fuckin awesome!) chat thread
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by cath777
Mani, use what Jiat did but P should be in thousands, so you start with P = 16,560 and then when you move this to the other side of the equation it become -9810 (=6750-16560). Solve this and you get 30, which added to 1970 gives 2000.
And, I'm lost on Q63 too. Do you have the formula to calculate a volume?
And, yes, I'm a total geek.
|
Yep, I got that too. t=30 because P is in 1000s.
I'll take a look at 63. I'm guessing there are some derivatives involved as you have to determine a max and the area under the curve.
Another geek here too. 
__________________
I love my girls.
Last edited by Angle Queen : 12-07-2005 at 12:17 PM.
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 12:19 PM
|
#174
|
|
Scavenger Hunter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: swimming across the pacific ocean
Posts: 31,857
|
Re: Nat = Tootsie Roll |: (p.s. Kimmay is fuckin awesome!) chat thread
yeah. i was thinkng it involved calculus. because u can't find the maximum of y just by solving the equation 
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dowa, on a theory proposed by Annie
the connection between his brain and his body has been restored!
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 12:25 PM
|
#175
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 11,307
|
Re: Nat = Tootsie Roll |: (p.s. Kimmay is fuckin awesome!) chat thread
SEND ME GOOD VIBES FOR MY FINAL!!!! please ):
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mtf
This forum requires that you wait 3 seconds between posts. Please try again in 2 seconds.
|
"...but the fact remains he can move faster than Severus Snape confronted with shampoo when he wants to..."
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 12:28 PM
|
#176
|
|
Scavenger Hunter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: swimming across the pacific ocean
Posts: 31,857
|
Re: Nat = Tootsie Roll |: (p.s. Kimmay is fuckin awesome!) chat thread
*send good vibes*
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dowa, on a theory proposed by Annie
the connection between his brain and his body has been restored!
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 12:38 PM
|
#177
|
|
Mom 2 2 Beauties
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On the deuce side, Looking to Come In
Posts: 11,897
|
Re: Nat = Tootsie Roll |: (p.s. Kimmay is fuckin awesome!) chat thread
*good vibes* *good vibes*
Now to problem 63.
To find 'maximum', you'll need the first derivative:
so if y = -0.0025x^2 + 1.25x, then the first derivative is:
y or 0 = (-0.0025*2)x + 1.25
Solving for x, yields:
0 = -0.005x + 1.25
-0.005x = -1.25
x = 250
Now, plug x = 250 into the equation to arrive at the maximum height.
y = -0.0025(250)^2 + 125(x)
y = -156.25 + 312.5
y(max) = +156.25
__________________
I love my girls.
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 12:45 PM
|
#178
|
|
Mom 2 2 Beauties
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On the deuce side, Looking to Come In
Posts: 11,897
|
Re: Nat = Tootsie Roll |: (p.s. Kimmay is fuckin awesome!) chat thread
Shall I go on? Or can you take it from here...with these hints:
"Width" is determined by 'solving' the equation.
"Volume" is determined by the 'area under the curve' (which should come from taking the integral between 0 and your 'width') multiplied by the depth (which looks to be 500 ft).
If you really want to get fancy and turn your answer in with how 'volume' would be expressesd on a real construction site, the solution should be in cubic yards (which is # of cubed feet divided by 27...or 3 cubed).
For example: 100 ft^3 = 3.7cy
And for what it's worth, a typical dump truck holds 10 cy.
(and I hope I'm right  . It's been a looooong time.)
__________________
I love my girls.
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 12:46 PM
|
#179
|
|
Scavenger Hunter
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: swimming across the pacific ocean
Posts: 31,857
|
Re: Nat = Tootsie Roll |: (p.s. Kimmay is fuckin awesome!) chat thread
ta daaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! calculus...  *waits for deb to freak out now*
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Dowa, on a theory proposed by Annie
the connection between his brain and his body has been restored!
|
|
|
|
12-07-2005, 12:49 PM
|
#180
|
|
Mom 2 2 Beauties
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: On the deuce side, Looking to Come In
Posts: 11,897
|
Re: Nat = Tootsie Roll |: (p.s. Kimmay is fuckin awesome!) chat thread
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by PennyThePenguin
ta daaaaa!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! calculus...  *waits for deb to freak out now*
|
Eh, I'm not sure it's exactly...calculus. I seem to remember doing some of this stuff in Algebra2 as well. Like I said, it's been a very, very long time. 1980. So that'd be on the order of 25 years. Longer...than most of ya'll have even been around. 
__________________
I love my girls.
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|