Originally Posted by MalwareDie
Mugboar only won at Indian Wells because Murray had just recovered from an illness and was playing terribly.
Roger lost against Murray because he missed a couple of shots here and there and just recovered from back problems and was playing terribly, but even then Murray couldn't achieve straight victory. But he won . After that Rafa won IW.
To be honest I can't understand the point. Probably you are trying to say that Murray is unbeatable and all we are deeply wrong thinking AO failure and the other his losses for a normal part of the game. OK so be it. From now on we are warned that every his loss is fictional .
PostWimby 2010 press conference.
Q. Do you feel you can get back to a position of domination in tennis?
ROGER FEDERER: Yeah, I do think that. That's why I'm here.
Following refers to Topspindoctor only:
Originally Posted by Fujee
So glad we colonised Austrailia with our criminals, they seem to have matured so well...
Just another Federer fan!