The Federer Decline Thread - Page 73 - MensTennisForums.com

MensTennisForums.com

MenstennisForums.com is the premier Men's Tennis forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!

View Poll Results: Do you agree with Pete?

No. I think Federer's decline is a fact and he's not winning any major in the future. 38 17.35%
I kinda agree... He's in a great moment, but the other 2 guys are too good. No more slams for Feddy 45 20.55%
I totally agree. Fed's still playing great tennis and he'll probably win another major 104 47.49%
Hello. I'm Rod Laver and my records are intact. Suck it losers. 32 14.61%
Voters: 219. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

Old 08-16-2012, 09:04 PM   #1081
country flag Greatness
Registered User
 
Greatness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 421
Greatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by luie View Post
On the big stage . I talk slams, that's why Presently don't rate Murray that high with his masters as compared to fed.
This era is a joke with only old injury prone no knees nadull and gluten free Novak.
Cut it any way u like. Nadull losing to the likes of 100 Rosol. Not winning a title of clay for what would be more that 2 years. He has reverted back to a core clay courter .
Gluten free Novak is ok , plus he had luck on his side at the USO. Hit n hope.
The rest of the tour is forgettable at best.
On the big stage, Federer has lost all his slam matches against Nadal since 2008. That kind of domination diminishes a lot of his aura he developed against the weak field of his era.

Nadal made the finals of IW/Miami 2011 (destroyed Federer 6-3 6-2 in Miami), won USO 2010, made the final of USO 2011 and made the final of the AO 2012 by beating Federer again in a slam. Rafa is now a threat on all courts. Novak is the one who has been stopping him in the hardcourt slams, not Federer.
Greatness is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 08-16-2012, 09:07 PM   #1082
country flag juan27
Registered User
 
juan27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Age: 26
Posts: 2,487
juan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatness View Post
In the history of tennis' Open Era, only 6 players have achieved 3 slams with multiple masters in the same year.
Three of them are playing right now and are sharing slams. That is a testament of how special the current top players are.

At Federer's peak, all he faced as a threat was baby Nadal and a lot of mugs.




The only joke is Federer losing to 34 year old Haas and washed up Roddick who can't even get a first serve in anymore.
if federer faced baby nadal , nole had to wait that nadal and federer low are levels too , he faced a past peak federer with 30 years old and he was defeated by him in roland garros and by miracle in the us open he could escape from roger with two matchpoints and 0-2 in sets.

nadal wassn`t the same level of 2010 and nole was very lucky because nadal arrived to the australian open very hungry for complete the "rafa slam" and with all the momentum of a great 2010 season incluiding his victory over nole in the us open final with many many confidecne , BUT nadal injury against ferrer gifted the chance to not face that very good and confidence nadal ( he was playing a very good australian open until his injury ) in the final , if nadal would beat nole in that australian open maybe all the great year of nole and his confidence would not happen.

if you talk about lucky , you need too see the things good
juan27 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:12 PM   #1083
country flag Litotes
ALT-0
 
Litotes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Age: 41
Posts: 30,146
Litotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatness View Post
It didn't matter how I qualified my statement because it was true either way that he beat top players this year regardless.
You were the one sinking to a new low by singling out Toronto while being fully aware that he had beaten the top 4 including Federer.

I'm counting all matches versus the top four. Whether or not he faced only 1 top player in Miami because Federer was too busy losing to Roddick isn't relevant to the point that to actually win the title, he had to beat a top player.
Sinking to a new low? If you stop making these mistakes, you won't have to be embarrassed when people point them out to you.

You are counting all matches against top 4? Really? Let us see. For top 4 stats this year, we have the following:
Djokovic 2012: 4 wins, 7 losses - 36% win rate
Federer 2012: 4 wins, 4 losses - 50% win rate

You are perhaps still more impressed by Djokovic' more matches, despite there being the same amount of wins?
Litotes is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:15 PM   #1084
country flag Greatness
Registered User
 
Greatness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 421
Greatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by juan27 View Post
if federer faced baby nadal , nole had to wait that nadal and federer low are levels too , he faced a past peak federer with 30 years old and he was defeated by him in roland garros and by miracle in the us open he could escape from roger with two matchpoints and 0-2 in sets.

nadal wassn`t the same level of 2010 and nole was very lucky because nadal arrived to the australian open very hungry for complete the "rafa slam" and with all the momentum of a great 2010 season incluiding his victory over nole in the us open final with many many confidecne , BUT nadal injury against ferrer gifted the chance to not face that very good and confidence nadal ( he was playing a very good australian open until his injury ) in the final , if nadal would beat nole in that australian open maybe all the great year of nole and his confidence would not happen.

if you talk about lucky , you need too see the things good
Novak didn't have to wait for anything. Novak started beating Federer in 2007, when he was 20 years old and Federer was 26. He made the USO final in 2007 and won the AO 2008 beating Federer on the way to the title. The problem for Novak was physical; he always had the game to be successful.
Greatness is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:15 PM   #1085
country flag Howard
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 309
Howard has a reputation beyond reputeHoward has a reputation beyond reputeHoward has a reputation beyond reputeHoward has a reputation beyond reputeHoward has a reputation beyond reputeHoward has a reputation beyond reputeHoward has a reputation beyond reputeHoward has a reputation beyond reputeHoward has a reputation beyond reputeHoward has a reputation beyond reputeHoward has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Singularity View Post
Claim #1 Federer's peaked in a weak era.

Claim #2 Federer was only dominant because he was playing in a weak era.

Proving claim one does not prove claim two.

That's the problem with all these 'weak era' debates. If Federer wasn't tested, because he faced weak opposition, then how are we supposed to know what he was capable of in the first place?
Maybe Fed was so much better than the competition that he made them seem weak by comparison. If he hadn't been around the rest wouldn't have appeared so weak because they would have been beating each other.
Howard is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:18 PM   #1086
country flag sco
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 403
sco has a reputation beyond reputesco has a reputation beyond reputesco has a reputation beyond reputesco has a reputation beyond reputesco has a reputation beyond reputesco has a reputation beyond reputesco has a reputation beyond reputesco has a reputation beyond reputesco has a reputation beyond reputesco has a reputation beyond reputesco has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatness View Post
Shame on them indeed. They should learn from Federer and play the occasional mug tournament to earn cheap points.
Mahut + Walkover against Youzhny + Niemenen + Davydenko + Delpo = 500 hard earned points from Federer.

Where was number 1 Federer at the Olympics? Getting thrashed by Murray.
And what's wrong with playing 500 tourneys. Why shouldn't Nadal play Barcelona or Fed play Basel/Rotterdam/Dubai if he wants. Doesn't Novak play Dubai? As far as I can see, it's not exactly beneficial to play these 500 tourneys (other than the huge appearance fees these players get for playing Dubai - even then, Fed spends a lot of time there). They play 5 matches and don't earn many points. And what about Nole cleaning up in Toronto with everyone injured/withdrawing left and right?

Fed was exhausted. Pretty good stretch - SF at French, Finals at Halle, won at Wimbly, Finals at Olympics. Emotional toll from the Del Potro match took too much out of him. I'm sure he's VERY HAPPY with his summer so far even with the Olympic Finals loss - that weeks at #1 record is sweet.
sco is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:19 PM   #1087
country flag Litotes
ALT-0
 
Litotes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Age: 41
Posts: 30,146
Litotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatness View Post
Novak didn't have to wait for anything. Novak started beating Federer in 2007, when he was 20 years old and Federer was 26. He made the USO final in 2007 and won the AO 2008 beating Federer on the way to the title. The problem for Novak was physical; he always had the game to be successful.
He didn't have to wait three years for his second slam?

Three years after taking his first slam, in exactly the same time frame it took Djokovic to win his second, Federer had already won eight. Nadal had four.
Litotes is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:22 PM   #1088
country flag Litotes
ALT-0
 
Litotes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Age: 41
Posts: 30,146
Litotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Howard View Post
Maybe Fed was so much better than the competition that he made them seem weak by comparison. If he hadn't been around the rest wouldn't have appeared so weak because they would have been beating each other.
Precisely. All arguments about weak eras besed on what players won stop at circular reasoning. The fact that noone consistently made the semis of all slams - except Federer - could just as easily be because there were 15-20 players fighting for #2 behind him at the time, as opposed to just three players doing the same today.
Litotes is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:23 PM   #1089
country flag juan27
Registered User
 
juan27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Age: 26
Posts: 2,487
juan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

yes , but federer in the semis of 2008 was not in his best level and tsonga defeated nadal in semis too , he was a bit of lucky too.

he had to wait until 2011.

this year he lost matches against mugs like isner or tipsarevic , del potro in his worst surface and after a very hard and long match against federer , could defeat nole in two sets........even hewitt or 34 years old haas were capable to won a set.
juan27 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:25 PM   #1090
country flag juan27
Registered User
 
juan27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Age: 26
Posts: 2,487
juan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond reputejuan27 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by bounccer View Post
L.O.L.

Nadal was awful from the beginning.

Yes, he straight-setted his opponents but it means nothing considering their level.

Even the pussal Tomic annoyed him a little bit.
yes , but nadal without the injury and with all the confidence of his great year and victory over nole in usa would be very different to murray
juan27 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:26 PM   #1091
country flag Greatness
Registered User
 
Greatness's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 421
Greatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond reputeGreatness has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Litotes View Post
Sinking to a new low? If you stop making these mistakes, you won't have to be embarrassed when people point them out to you.
You should be the one embarrassed to argue Novak only won Toronto without the top players even though the only reason Federer is ranked 1st right now is because of winning a mug tournament like Rotterdamn.

Quote:
You are counting all matches against top 4? Really? Let us see. For top 4 stats this year, we have the following:
Djokovic 2012: 4 wins, 7 losses - 36% win rate
Federer 2012: 4 wins, 4 losses - 50% win rate

You are perhaps still more impressed by Djokovic' more matches, despite there being the same amount of wins?

The more important stat is Novak being 2-1 against Federer.
Greatness is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:27 PM   #1092
country flag bounccer
Registered User
 
bounccer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 39
Posts: 849
bounccer has a reputation beyond reputebounccer has a reputation beyond reputebounccer has a reputation beyond reputebounccer has a reputation beyond reputebounccer has a reputation beyond reputebounccer has a reputation beyond reputebounccer has a reputation beyond reputebounccer has a reputation beyond reputebounccer has a reputation beyond reputebounccer has a reputation beyond reputebounccer has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Djokovic gained a lot more points while Federer was absent in 2012 than the opposite.

Federer absent in MC and Toronto = 1600 points for Nole
Djokovic absent from Doha, Rotterdam and Halle = 740 points for Fed, so i don't see the point here

If you look about the 52 lasts week, you add Basel, 500 points more for Fed = still less than Djokovic

So, Greatness = big fail

F
bounccer is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:30 PM   #1093
country flag barbadosan
Registered User
 
barbadosan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Barbados - land of sand, sea, sun & sex
Posts: 6,796
barbadosan has a reputation beyond reputebarbadosan has a reputation beyond reputebarbadosan has a reputation beyond reputebarbadosan has a reputation beyond reputebarbadosan has a reputation beyond reputebarbadosan has a reputation beyond reputebarbadosan has a reputation beyond reputebarbadosan has a reputation beyond reputebarbadosan has a reputation beyond reputebarbadosan has a reputation beyond reputebarbadosan has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatness View Post
You should be the one embarrassed to argue Novak only won Toronto without the top players even though the only reason Federer is ranked 1st right now is because of winning a mug tournament like Rotterdamn.




The more important stat is Novak being 2-1 against Federer.
The most important stat, long after your circular arguments that try to defy the obvious principles of Ockham's Razor are lost away in some archive on a long-forgotten server, will be 17 >>>>>> 5
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by masterclass View Post
This is men's tennis, not the WTA. (The serve) - It's supposed to be a weapon, not a garden party introduction.

Respectfully,
masterclass
___________________________

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." - Richard Cook
barbadosan is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:31 PM   #1094
country flag Litotes
ALT-0
 
Litotes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Age: 41
Posts: 30,146
Litotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: The Federer Decline Thread (Federer will drop to number 4 next year)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greatness View Post
You should be the one embarrassed to argue Novak only won Toronto without the top players even though the only reason Federer is ranked 1st right now is because of winning a mug tournament like Rotterdamn.

The more important stat is Novak being 2-1 against Federer.
You cannot deflect your embarrassment on others. Rotterdam was just as good as Toronto for 500 points less.

I see. Top 4 statistics was only important until you realized Federers was better. I repeat, because you have probably forgot - your memory is not up to these kinds of discussions. Unless you fail on purpose to make Federer look good. Wouldn't surprise me, but I can tell you this - it is not necessary.
Litotes is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-16-2012, 09:32 PM   #1095
country flag manadrainer
Registered User
 
manadrainer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Age: 30
Posts: 1,859
manadrainer has a reputation beyond reputemanadrainer has a reputation beyond reputemanadrainer has a reputation beyond reputemanadrainer has a reputation beyond reputemanadrainer has a reputation beyond reputemanadrainer has a reputation beyond reputemanadrainer has a reputation beyond reputemanadrainer has a reputation beyond reputemanadrainer has a reputation beyond reputemanadrainer has a reputation beyond reputemanadrainer has a reputation beyond repute
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Silvester View Post
Because the current #1 is the GOAT.
Shhhhhh! Don't tell the tards or they'll be mad at you.
__________________
8th day of July 2012: 7-time Wimbledon champion!

Once upon a time there was a myth about strong and weak eras. On this glorious day the clownery was eventually unmasked: 30 y.o. past-prime daddy Fed became #1 once again in the supposed strong "Spartan" era with his rivals at their peak.
And they all lived happily ever after.
Long live King Federer!


17 Grand Slam titles
7 Wimbledon titles
302 weeks at #1
Legend
manadrainer is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios