Originally Posted by posteni
I must say I'm very sorry for Mario, who obviously has some kind of Ljubo complex which prevents him to destroy that "worst No. 3 in history of tennis".
I've been watching finals on TV, and must say that Stakhovsky deserved this victory alhough it was so obvious he has no real quality. Ljubo played well from time to time only, like he had expected Stakhovsky to get defeated by himself.
Shouldnt even bother to answer that but,
Why you cant just accept Ljubo was better and that he won?:retard:
And btw let me know when you'll be no.3 in the world in something (which doesnt include stupidity of course).