[Baghdatis72]

We'll have to wait and see. Roman has something planned imo.

[Burrow]

Mourinho is a fucking headcase, Chelski wont win anything this year.

[Burrow]

Originally Posted by LeChuck

This is terrible news for Chelsea fans, and the Premiership in general. Chelsea hadn't won a league title for 50 years, then he came along won 2 in as many seasons.

The reason why Chelski won the Premiership is because of Roman, he brought money. Not because of Mourinho, and that is blaring.

[Burrow]

Originally Posted by YayoMassa skadad

The special one couldn't handle the annoying dwarf interfering.

If you are reffering to Abramovich as the "annoying dwarf" (for some reason) - he can do what the hell he wants, it's his club.

[qczi]

Originally Posted by Burrow

Mourinho is a fucking headcase, Chelski wont win anything this year.

Originally Posted by Burrow

The reason why Chelski won the Premiership is because of Roman, he brought money. Not because of Mourinho, and that is blaring.

isnt this a bit of a paradox?
if you think the success came because of roman's money and not jose's capabilities nothing should change this season. mr money is still there

chelsea was just another mediocre club before mourinho and he won 2 premier league titles for them in 3 seasons

[Action Jackson]

Originally Posted by Burrow

If you are reffering to Abramovich as the "annoying dwarf" (for some reason) - he can do what the hell he wants, it's his club.

Facts are this. Abramovich has the cash, he should stick to what he knows and that isn't the day to day football tactical side of things, that are done on the training paddock and put into practice on the pitch.

Mourinho is the one that got them to play together as a unit when they actually won things.

Yes, he is annoying dwarf, who wanted to hide some Russian money into a broke London club. He doesn't give a fuck about football, it's about the cash for him.

[LeChuck]

Originally Posted by Burrow

The reason why Chelski won the Premiership is because of Roman, he brought money. Not because of Mourinho, and that is blaring.

True Roman's roubles were the main reason behind Chelsea success, but Mourinho deserves a hell of a lot of credit and was still a major factor. He moulded a team of superstars together into a cohesive unit and that isn't always an easy thing to do. The team spirit there was fantastic. The players were saying that his training methods, approach to fitness etc was revolutionary. Joe Cole became a much better player thanks to him, and developed more of a cutting edge and was less wasteful when he had possession. Mourinho was a great motivator, and was an expert at taking the pressure off his players before they headed onto the pitch.
Hector Cuper had shed loads of money to spend at Inter Milan and didn't win anything, so money doesn't always guarentee success.
Even with the money he had to spend, I don't think that there are many managers in world football who could have replicated the success that he brought to the club.

[Burrow]

Originally Posted by qczi

isnt this a bit of a paradox?
if you think the success came because of roman's money and not jose's capabilities nothing should change this season. mr money is still there

chelsea was just another mediocre club before mourinho and he won 2 premier league titles for them in 3 seasons

I never said Chelski wont win anything BECAUSE Mourinho has left.

Give Wigan the amount of money Chelski have spent, and Wigan would be in the champions league.

All because of money.

[DRXX]

Roman uses attacking while Cappelo uses defense...

I want Cappelo to coach Chelsea. And i heard that Mourhino will be coaching Portugal now..

[Burrow]

Originally Posted by YayoMassa skadad

Facts are this. Abramovich has the cash, he should stick to what he knows and that isn't the day to day football tactical side of things, that are done on the training paddock and put into practice on the pitch.

Mourinho is the one that got them to play together as a unit when they actually won things.

Yes, he is annoying dwarf, who wanted to hide some Russian money into a broke London club. He doesn't give a fuck about football, it's about the cash for him.

He can do what he wants, despite what you say. There is no rule saying he can't have a say in the team beside financial matters.

I still don't know why you use the word dwarf. Normally used for smaller people, he is not a small man.

[Burrow]

Originally Posted by LeChuck

True Roman's roubles were the main reason behind Chelsea success, but Mourinho deserves a hell of a lot of credit and was still a major factor. He moulded a team of superstars together into a cohesive unit and that isn't always an easy thing to do. The team spirit there was fantastic. The players were saying that his training methods, approach to fitness etc was revolutionary. Joe Cole became a much better player thanks to him, and developed more of a cutting edge and was less wasteful when he had possession. Mourinho was a great motivator, and was an expert at taking the pressure off his players before they headed onto the pitch.
Hector Cuper had shed loads of money to spend at Inter Milan and didn't win anything, so money doesn't always guarentee success.
Even with the money he had to spend, I don't think that there are many managers in world football who could have replicated the success that he brought to the club.

Maybe Joe Cole improved a little because of the team that was around him??

anyways...Joe Cole?

[Action Jackson]

Originally Posted by Burrow

I never said Chelski wont win anything BECAUSE Mourinho has left.

Give Wigan the amount of money Chelski have spent, and Wigan would be in the champions league.

All because of money.

Doesn't work like that necessarily.

Inter spend stupid amounts of money and they only won the Serie A cause of a scandal.

When Man Utd specifically tried to buy titles, it didn't work and then Fergie won it with a lot of local players.

Real Madrid when they wanted to be galaticos, once they got rid of the some of the big stars, they started winning more titles.

[Action Jackson]

Originally Posted by Burrow

He can do what he wants, despite what you say. There is no rule saying he can't have a say in the team beside financial matters.

I still don't know why you use the word dwarf. Normally used for smaller people, he is not a small man.

Ok, I own a private hospital, but I am not qualified to be a doctor, but I can give advice in the medical field to people who are in a better and more qualified position than myself.

Chairmen don't pick teams, he knows shit all about football. Sticking to making money is his specialiity, not interfering in team selections.

[LeChuck]

Originally Posted by Burrow

Maybe Joe Cole improved a little because of the team that was around him??

anyways...Joe Cole?

Compare Joe Cole in the 1st half of the 2004/2005 and the 2nd half, and the difference was immense. Even he admitted that he became a much better player thanks to Mourinho's man management skills. In so many tight away matches, he popped up at crucial moments with goals. He created far more goals as well, and became much more assured with his weaker left foot.

[amdany]

Originally Posted by YayoMassa skadad

Ok, I own a private hospital, but I am not qualified to be a doctor, but I can give advice in the medical field to people who are in a better and more qualified position than myself.

Chairmen don't pick teams, he knows shit all about football. Sticking to making money is his specialiity, not interfering in team selections.

well said

Hey guys and what about Drogba? What will he do, I mean they were very close with Jose and in an interview he gave to a french tv a few months ago, Jose said approximatively "if I leave Chelsea, I'll do my pssible to bring Didier with me" and he said something like "if we were in a war,Didier would be my best soldier with me: I have all faith in him"