President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000 - Page 2 - MensTennisForums.com

MensTennisForums.com

MenstennisForums.com is the premier Men's Tennis forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!

Reply

Old 12-02-2009, 01:44 AM   #16
country flag Chip_s_m
Registered User
 
Chip_s_m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,063
Chip_s_m has a reputation beyond reputeChip_s_m has a reputation beyond reputeChip_s_m has a reputation beyond reputeChip_s_m has a reputation beyond reputeChip_s_m has a reputation beyond reputeChip_s_m has a reputation beyond reputeChip_s_m has a reputation beyond reputeChip_s_m has a reputation beyond reputeChip_s_m has a reputation beyond reputeChip_s_m has a reputation beyond reputeChip_s_m has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000

I have no problems trying a surge. It worked in Iraq. If implemented properly with the necessary tweaks for Afghanistan then there's no reason to think that it won't work again. If it doesn't significantly improve the situation then we get out (or use the nukes).

Last edited by Chip_s_m : 12-02-2009 at 01:54 AM.
Chip_s_m is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 12-02-2009, 01:47 AM   #17
country flag Byrd
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,335
Byrd has a reputation beyond reputeByrd has a reputation beyond reputeByrd has a reputation beyond reputeByrd has a reputation beyond reputeByrd has a reputation beyond reputeByrd has a reputation beyond reputeByrd has a reputation beyond reputeByrd has a reputation beyond reputeByrd has a reputation beyond reputeByrd has a reputation beyond reputeByrd has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000

Quote:
Originally Posted by prima donna View Post
Do tell us what a rigorous task it was to unearth such boundless wisdom from your repository of knowledge.
Say what you want, but him sending in 30,000 troops is a clear message that he wants to finish off this war as soon as possible, and taking out the financial implications of this, the target isn't even realistic, it just distracts from the major issues in the good ole U.S.A, in which Obama is clearly inept at.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ichiban1920 View Post
It's my job to put these pathetic Nadull-fanboys in their place. They're the scourge and bane of the tennis world.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arhaych View Post
Nadal is more conservative than Margaret Thatcher.
^^QFT

"I asked a bloke in the front row if he liked the serve-and-volley stuff," said Rafter. "He said he did but asked if he was going to get to see any rallies. 'Not today, mate,' I told him."-Pat Rafter silencing the Nadull fanboys
Byrd is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 03:46 AM   #18
country flag ~*BGT*~
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Paris
Age: 25
Posts: 9,871
~*BGT*~ has a reputation beyond repute~*BGT*~ has a reputation beyond repute~*BGT*~ has a reputation beyond repute~*BGT*~ has a reputation beyond repute~*BGT*~ has a reputation beyond repute~*BGT*~ has a reputation beyond repute~*BGT*~ has a reputation beyond repute~*BGT*~ has a reputation beyond repute~*BGT*~ has a reputation beyond repute~*BGT*~ has a reputation beyond repute~*BGT*~ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000

Quote:
Originally Posted by R.Federer View Post
I'll stop the war, I'll close down Guantanomo, I'll overturn don't-ask-don't-tell .... he is now zero for three. Turning out to be just one of the rest of them? Not you too Obama!
That can't all be done in 10 months.
__________________
______________________________

~♠ Gasquetaires ♠~

un pour tous, tous pour un
‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾‾
~*BGT*~ is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 12:06 PM   #19
country flag Stensland
Registered User
 
Stensland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6,227
Stensland has a reputation beyond reputeStensland has a reputation beyond reputeStensland has a reputation beyond reputeStensland has a reputation beyond reputeStensland has a reputation beyond reputeStensland has a reputation beyond reputeStensland has a reputation beyond reputeStensland has a reputation beyond reputeStensland has a reputation beyond reputeStensland has a reputation beyond reputeStensland has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000

as long as afghans fuck like rabbits the war is pretty much a dead end. it's like the war of attrition by nasser. i have no idea how to deal with the afghan youth bulge. carpet-bomb the country with anti-baby-pills maybe? sterilise afghan women?

if soviet russia can't cope with it, the western world won't be able to either. afghans just multiply...and multiply...and multiply...

pd, what time frame do you think we're talking about here? when do you expect the troops to leave afghanistan?

and do you think america will be on its own there some time soon?
Stensland is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 12:11 PM   #20
country flag Bilbo
Registered User
 
Bilbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lena-Land
Posts: 73,673
Bilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000

Quote:
Originally Posted by El Legenda View Post
umm stopping the war cant happen without sending more troops to Afganistan, pulling all the troops will not stop the war it will start a whole new war with Taliban taking over Afganistan, sending more troops is the only opition to stop the war, Bush and the GOP rushed Afganistan just to get to Saddam, Obama is now left with cleaning up that mess and doing this right.
the taliban will overtake Afghanistan anyway as soon as the U.S. troops are out. i don't get what their goal is. do they think they can destroy the taliban once and forever?
Bilbo is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 12:19 PM   #21
country flag Commander Data
Registered User
 
Commander Data's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: XR-17
Posts: 10,058
Commander Data has a reputation beyond reputeCommander Data has a reputation beyond reputeCommander Data has a reputation beyond reputeCommander Data has a reputation beyond reputeCommander Data has a reputation beyond reputeCommander Data has a reputation beyond reputeCommander Data has a reputation beyond reputeCommander Data has a reputation beyond reputeCommander Data has a reputation beyond reputeCommander Data has a reputation beyond reputeCommander Data has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000

I heard that the only reason America is in Afghanistan is because huge Gas Pipelines run thru there.

Don't know if it is true though.
__________________
"You cannot be a number one in the world and be a good loser"

- Magnus Carlsen
Commander Data is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 12:20 PM   #22
country flag Bilbo
Registered User
 
Bilbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lena-Land
Posts: 73,673
Bilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000

Quote:
Originally Posted by Commander Data View Post
I heard that the only reason America is in Afghanistan is because huge Gas Pipelines run thru there.

Don't know if it is true though.
true
Bilbo is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 12:24 PM   #23
country flag zeleni
Registered User
 
zeleni's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,172
zeleni has a reputation beyond reputezeleni has a reputation beyond reputezeleni has a reputation beyond reputezeleni has a reputation beyond reputezeleni has a reputation beyond reputezeleni has a reputation beyond reputezeleni has a reputation beyond reputezeleni has a reputation beyond reputezeleni has a reputation beyond reputezeleni has a reputation beyond reputezeleni has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000

Quote:
Originally Posted by prima donna View Post
Conscription came to an end in the 70s, therefore all duties carried out by U.S. troops are of a voluntary nature.
Shifting from conscription to mercenary army isn't good sign for USA, imho.
zeleni is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 01:00 PM   #24
country flag Bilbo
Registered User
 
Bilbo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Lena-Land
Posts: 73,673
Bilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond reputeBilbo has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000

obama should lay down his nobel peace prize imo
Bilbo is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 01:20 PM   #25
country flag JolánGagó
Banned!
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 17,155
JolánGagó has a reputation beyond reputeJolánGagó has a reputation beyond reputeJolánGagó has a reputation beyond reputeJolánGagó has a reputation beyond reputeJolánGagó has a reputation beyond reputeJolánGagó has a reputation beyond reputeJolánGagó has a reputation beyond reputeJolánGagó has a reputation beyond reputeJolánGagó has a reputation beyond reputeJolánGagó has a reputation beyond reputeJolánGagó has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000

Afghanistan is a dead end a zillion times worse than Vietnam. The only solution would be carpet-bombing the whole country into stardust but, alas, it isn't feasible.
JolánGagó is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 01:21 PM   #26
country flag prima donna
Banned!
 
prima donna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 7,319
prima donna has a reputation beyond reputeprima donna has a reputation beyond reputeprima donna has a reputation beyond reputeprima donna has a reputation beyond reputeprima donna has a reputation beyond reputeprima donna has a reputation beyond reputeprima donna has a reputation beyond reputeprima donna has a reputation beyond reputeprima donna has a reputation beyond reputeprima donna has a reputation beyond reputeprima donna has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rrrainer View Post
as long as afghans fuck like rabbits the war is pretty much a dead end. it's like the war of attrition by nasser. i have no idea how to deal with the afghan youth bulge. carpet-bomb the country with anti-baby-pills maybe? sterilise afghan women?

if soviet russia can't cope with it, the western world won't be able to either. afghans just multiply...and multiply...and multiply...

pd, what time frame do you think we're talking about here? when do you expect the troops to leave afghanistan?

and do you think america will be on its own there some time soon?
Withdrawal will be contingent upon the conditions on the ground, and given that I haven't the ability to foresee the future, I would rather not prognosticate. Although it should be made clear that nation building is not the objective, therefore variables such as a 10% literacy rate, average age of 17 years, and life expectancy of 44 years while significant, do not undermine the goal to purge from the region Taliban influence and rule.

What's more, in order for Afghan forces to be trained and the region itself stabilized, reinforcements from our allies are imperative. Stabilization, not democratization is the objective.

Indeed, so long as the region is no longer being used by the Taliban to recruit and train terrorists, Afghans are free to live under Sharia law or any other such anachronistic system of law preferred by a centralized government.

Last edited by prima donna : 12-02-2009 at 01:33 PM.
prima donna is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 01:23 PM   #27
country flag Action Jackson
Forum Umpire:
Gaston Gaudio
 
Action Jackson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,476
Action Jackson has a reputation beyond reputeAction Jackson has a reputation beyond reputeAction Jackson has a reputation beyond reputeAction Jackson has a reputation beyond reputeAction Jackson has a reputation beyond reputeAction Jackson has a reputation beyond reputeAction Jackson has a reputation beyond reputeAction Jackson has a reputation beyond reputeAction Jackson has a reputation beyond reputeAction Jackson has a reputation beyond reputeAction Jackson has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000

Quote:
Originally Posted by JolánGagó View Post
Afghanistan is a dead end zillion times worst than Vietnam. The only solution would be carpet-bombing the whole country into stardust but, alas, it isn't feasible.
There is only so much you can do, turning rubble into dust.
__________________
On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".


Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V. View Post
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
Action Jackson is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 01:43 PM   #28
country flag scoobs
Anastasia Komananov, KGB
 
scoobs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Age: 36
Posts: 53,458
scoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond reputescoobs has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000

How does one win an unwinnable war?

The only options here are to try and undermine the Taliban by encouraging the Afghans themselves to reject them - which means providing a better alternative. Freedom, economic improvement, a stake in the future of their country, and security provided by Afghans themselves ultimately.

The Taliban cannot be totally defeated militarily any more than the Viet Cong could. The more reasonable elements of the Taliban have to be re-integrated, and the security forces have to oppose the rest and provide security for the country, while improvements are made to the quality of life of ordinary Afghans so that they reject the extremism on offer by the Taliban.

Then we can come home.

The whole situation is a dire mess and have been for years, but walking away is hardly a smart move either. If we did that, Karzai's regime, corrupt and unpalatable as it is, would be washed away in months and replaced by another Taliban dictatorship that would allow the country to become a hotbed of extremism again, with the capability of projecting that violent extremism internationally. And it's not inconceivable that the resulting turmoil could see the government of Pakistan fall, and then you're in a serious mess because that's a nuclear state.

I don't like the idea of sending more troops to the area but it seems like a necessary first step. They key thing here though is to have a clear, achievable exit strategy in mind that is being worked towards, and the resources necessary to achieve it. I think the timescales being proposed are very ambitious though and will probably slip.
scoobs is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 01:49 PM   #29
country flag Jimnik
Registered User
 
Jimnik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 20,741
Jimnik has a reputation beyond reputeJimnik has a reputation beyond reputeJimnik has a reputation beyond reputeJimnik has a reputation beyond reputeJimnik has a reputation beyond reputeJimnik has a reputation beyond reputeJimnik has a reputation beyond reputeJimnik has a reputation beyond reputeJimnik has a reputation beyond reputeJimnik has a reputation beyond reputeJimnik has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000

I wonder if western powers will ever find an effective way of instilling stability in foreign nations.
Jimnik is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2009, 02:07 PM   #30
country flag R.Federer
Registered User
 
R.Federer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,821
R.Federer has a reputation beyond reputeR.Federer has a reputation beyond reputeR.Federer has a reputation beyond reputeR.Federer has a reputation beyond reputeR.Federer has a reputation beyond reputeR.Federer has a reputation beyond reputeR.Federer has a reputation beyond reputeR.Federer has a reputation beyond reputeR.Federer has a reputation beyond reputeR.Federer has a reputation beyond reputeR.Federer has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: President Obama increases U.S. forces in Afghanistan by 30,000

Quote:
Originally Posted by ~*BGT*~ View Post
That can't all be done in 10 months.
He pledged to have troops withdrawal from Iraq within 16 months of taking office. Okay, I will hold out till April 2010 to see ... but somehow, it is my impression that the withdrawal will not be done by then.
I am also hopeful that he comes through with the repeal on DADT. On the campaign he was quite adamant he would repeal. By this year, it has been a bit more guarded. Before the speech to the GLA, Gates made it sound like it could be held off for a while.
Gitmo, well I am hopeful that something concrete is said about that-- timetable, for instance.
__________________
He's here!!!!
Details at http://www.menstennisforums.com/showthread.php?t=132151
R.Federer is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios