 |
|
06-19-2008, 01:08 AM
|
#46
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,110
|
Re: pundits predictions for Wimbledon 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Papagena
As you know, I like both, and I'll be very happy if they both make it to the final again - I can only hope they will. But seeing all these journo's shamelessly jumping on a bandwagon - whichever - infuriates me. I bet they'll be the same ones to act as vultures when their predictions don't come true... 
|
Easy now, Karin 
you will get another Fedal Final,
only I am hoping for a reverse outcome from last year 
we all know the only prediction which matter
is the one from the great historian...
the little round man with the funky pants...
what is his name... Oh! Bud Collins 
__________________
:: Rafael Nadal ::
World Number 1!
>>PHENOMENADAL.COM 
-Rafael Nadal Fansite! A Fresh Look.
-Still Slammin' for SAFIN. Forever.
Ferrero . Robredo . Nalbandian
I don't like Federer or Djokovic.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
06-19-2008, 01:54 AM
|
#47
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2005
Age: 41
Posts: 2,847
|
Re: pundits predictions for Wimbledon 2008
Though I want Rafa, Roger is still the favorite. Why? He has the best serve of the top three contenders, and, when push comes to shove, this is THE most critical aspect of grass court tennis.
__________________
Thanks for the gutsy run, Phillies!!! World Series Champs...2010!!!
Roland Garros 2010: THE RETURN OF THE KING
Quote:
|
"If going to the ledge so often, both mentally and physically, shaves a couple years off of Rafael Nadal's career, so be it. Because of him, and because of his performances in matches like this, we've gotten to see just how far the sport can push a man"
|
http://content.ytmnd.com/content/0/4...f95a57d421.gif
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 02:01 AM
|
#48
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 17,547
|
Re: pundits predictions for Wimbledon 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by sawan66278
Though I want Rafa, Roger is still the favorite. Why? He has the best serve of the top three contenders, and, when push comes to shove, this is THE most critical aspect of grass court tennis.
|
True. The serve is what won Federer the tournament last year.
__________________
"I think that now and until the end of my career, I can really play with my mind at peace, and no longer hear that I've never won Roland Garros." - Roger Federer
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 02:12 AM
|
#49
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2008
Age: 43
Posts: 3,282
|
Re: pundits predictions for Wimbledon 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by guga2120
Roger is still the favorite, but he certainly got the cakewalk last year, let's hope its better this year.
I think Novak has decent chance to win, I don't want to see it happen, but I could see him winning.
|
I don't doubt NOVAK could win he is a good player but for him to do it he will have to get through both fed & nadal to do it not an easy task @ slams on any surface.
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 03:52 AM
|
#50
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 454
|
Re: pundits predictions for Wimbledon 2008
I don't see how it's bandwagony to suggest Nadal will win. He's playing better than he did last year (and he almost won Wimbledon then), plus Roger is playing worse overall. Some people are acting like there is no logical reason to think Nadal could win, which boggles me considering the facts.
__________________
NadalFerrer
WawrinkaSimonNalbandianBaghdatis
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 03:59 AM
|
#51
|
|
Anathemaniac
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Wall.
Posts: 41,910
|
Re: pundits predictions for Wimbledon 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lucinda
I don't see how it's bandwagony to suggest Nadal will win. He's playing better than he did last year (and he almost won Wimbledon then), plus Roger is playing worse overall. Some people are acting like there is no logical reason to think Nadal could win, which boggles me considering the facts.
|
Nobody (at least not the sane posters over here) says that Nadal can't win Wimbly this year. Rather the contrary, I think a lot of people rightfully pick him as one of the main candidates (I admit that I'm one of them).
But stating that He. Will. Indeed. Win. This. Year. - yes, that's bandwagonning, indeed. Fed's not retired, yet. Djoko is there as well. Not to mention quite a bunch of floaters which might well give him a nasty task along the way. Facing Reality... yes I know - it sucks. 
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 04:45 AM
|
#52
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 35
|
Re: pundits predictions for Wimbledon 2008
nadal lost in 4 sets in 2006 and then nadal lost in 5 sets in 2007 and now its 2008 and so nadal will win, its going to be really really fun 
__________________
 my bf won wimbledon - he is rafa nadal
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 05:12 AM
|
#53
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: San Antonio Texas
Age: 32
Posts: 4,272
|
Re: pundits predictions for Wimbledon 2008
Why is Djoko third? He's never beaten Roddick or Murray on the Grass before.
I'd rank them Federer/Nadal/Roddick/Murray/Djokovic/Gasquet/Hewitt.
I don't really see grass clowns like Blake,Davydenko,Ferrer,Wawrinka or Nalby doing any damage.
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 06:24 AM
|
#54
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kanata
Posts: 6,228
|
Re: pundits predictions for Wimbledon 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by JediFed
Why is Djoko third? He's never beaten Roddick or Murray on the Grass before.
I'd rank them Federer/Nadal/Roddick/Murray/Djokovic/Gasquet/Hewitt.
I don't really see grass clowns like Blake,Davydenko,Ferrer,Wawrinka or Nalby doing any damage.
|
  I shouldn't say anything because your post is so silly. However, look at their results on grass last and this year plus their rankings and hopefully you'll understand. There is a grass formula used at W to determine seeding. Your comment about Djokovic never beating Roddick or Murray on grass is hilarious  . They never met on grass, so what. Can you give me ONE good reason why would Murray be seeded higher than Djokovic (he is ranked #11, didn't even play W last year)? I don't even know why I'm bothering to type this.
Last edited by Alex999 : 06-19-2008 at 06:41 AM.
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 06:48 AM
|
#55
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 574
|
Re: pundits predictions for Wimbledon 2008
I'm annoyed at how Rafa is pushed into this favorite's role. I think more players can threaten him on grass opposed to with Fed. Rafa has a really hard time with big servers/hitters imo. I was chewing my nails like crazy with the Nishikori and Karlovic matches. I don't think those players would've made Fed sweat like that tbh.
I mean, on what exactly are these pundits going? Fed's incredible grass streak?  Perhaps Rafa has a mental advantage but Fed DEFINITELY has the edge on grass with him. Just no doubt about it. Though I do think Rafa's closer to winning from Fed on grass than Fed from Rafa on clay. But still, if I were a pundit (  ), I would've picked Fed to win Wimbledon. I hope the contrary of course.
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 07:06 AM
|
#56
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 35
|
Re: pundits predictions for Wimbledon 2008
but nadal didnt drop a set at last years wimbledon till the final and really should have won in the final he was up a break in the 5th set 
__________________
 my bf won wimbledon - he is rafa nadal
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 07:14 AM
|
#57
|
|
:)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Age: 37
Posts: 17,687
|
Re: pundits predictions for Wimbledon 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by yvonne_lingerie
but nadal didnt drop a set at last years wimbledon till the final and really should have won in the final he was up a break in the 5th set 
|
R 32 Nadal - Söderling 6-4 6-4 6-7(7) 4-6 7-5
R 16 Nadal - Youzhny 4-6 3-6 6-1 6-2 6-2
S Nadal - Djokovic 3-6 6-1 4-1 RET

__________________
I’ve never seen a tennis player – and I’ve met many athletes and champions from all professions throughout Tommy’s entire career – as a person and a complete athlete, Roger is so friendly, so cordial, so open with people. With zero arrogance. The hair on my arm is almost standing up right now. What I’m saying, in essence, it’s almost unbelievable that this type of person exists.
He’s such a pure, class act. In other words, he’s humble. Yet he does not need to be.
(Peter Haas about Roger)
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 07:14 AM
|
#58
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 574
|
Re: pundits predictions for Wimbledon 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Eden
R 32 Nadal - Söderling 6-4 6-4 6-7(7) 4-6 7-5
R 16 Nadal - Youzhny 4-6 3-6 6-1 6-2 6-2
S Nadal - Djokovic 3-6 6-1 4-1 RET

|
That's what I thought too.
I believe Fed didn't drop a set. If he did, it couldn't have been many.
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 07:17 AM
|
#59
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,038
|
Re: pundits predictions for Wimbledon 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by JediFed
Why is Djoko third? He's never beaten Roddick or Murray on the Grass before.
I'd rank them Federer/Nadal/Roddick/Murray/Djokovic/Gasquet/Hewitt.
I don't really see grass clowns like Blake,Davydenko,Ferrer,Wawrinka or Nalby doing any damage.
|
Roddick or Murray haven't beaten him on grass either. Besides Djokovic has gone farther than Murray ever has and Roddick won't be winning too many rallies against Djokovic especially backhand to backhand though I think that would be an intriguing match up. The past few years Roddick hasn't had the best results at Wimbledon and with his Djokovic's consistency on all surfaces I would say that gives him an edge.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by NYCtennisfan
You cannot be great without having haters. It's a fact of life.
|
 I guess Roddick must be the greatest player to ever play the game.
|
|
|
06-19-2008, 07:17 AM
|
#60
|
|
:)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Age: 37
Posts: 17,687
|
Re: pundits predictions for Wimbledon 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by CHoColATe&Rafa
I believe Fed didn't drop a set. If he did, it couldn't have been many.
|
He dropped a set in the QF against Ferrero 7-6(2) 3-6 6-1 6-3
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|