View Poll Results: Do you agree with Pete?
|
|
No. I think Federer's decline is a fact and he's not winning any major in the future.
|
 
|
38 |
17.43% |
|
I kinda agree... He's in a great moment, but the other 2 guys are too good. No more slams for Feddy
|
 
|
45 |
20.64% |
|
I totally agree. Fed's still playing great tennis and he'll probably win another major
|
 
|
103 |
47.25% |
|
Hello. I'm Rod Laver and my records are intact. Suck it losers.
|
 
|
32 |
14.68% |
| Voters: 218. You may not vote on this poll |
 |
|
05-13-2008, 03:58 PM
|
#46
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Age: 37
Posts: 429
|
Re: A Post and Some Figures Worthy of its Own Thread - Sharing is Caring Guys!
Quote:
Originally Posted by HNCS
form TonyNathan
Roger is just 26. There is no magical age when a top tennis players suddenly loses his effectiveness. Lendl finally became No. 1 at age 25 and remained No. 1 for four of the five years until he was 29 years old. The age of the No. 1 tennis player has been going up and down over the last 40 years. In 1968, Laver was 31 years; 1974, Connor 22 yrs; 1975, Ashe 32 yrs; 1977, Borg 21 yrs; 1982, Connors 30 yrs; 1987, Lendl 27 yrs (in 1989, Lendl was 29 yrs; 1993, Sampras 22 yrs; 1998, Sampras: 28 yrs; 1999, Agassi 29 yrs; 2001, Hewitt 20 yrs; 2007, Federer 26 yrs. There is not much age difference between 29-year Agassi in 1999 and 30-year Laver in 1968, or 20-year Hewitt in 2001 and 21-year Borg in 1977.
|
Nothing in the original post by TonyNathan other than telling that #1 players could come back anytime. But how quickly? In one year tour, next one, or nothing at all? The post already told us the examples.
While Fed is fighting through his fitness and trying to gain more trophy this year, someone can also be better and take his crown in the end. Just like Lendl when he slipped to No. 2 in 1988. If Fed's fall is too low, than no way back for him. Anyway he's still on top, but the young gunners seem to be more deadly right now and he's been suffering in many departments.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
05-13-2008, 04:02 PM
|
#47
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Age: 37
Posts: 429
|
Re: A Post and Some Figures Worthy of its Own Thread - Sharing is Caring Guys!
I mean, the history you gave us here has no GUARANTEE for Roger.
|
|
|
05-13-2008, 04:21 PM
|
#48
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,759
|
Re: A Post and Some Figures Worthy of its Own Thread - Sharing is Caring Guys!
People are offended by facts  
|
|
|
05-13-2008, 09:46 PM
|
#49
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2007
Age: 27
Posts: 19,791
|
Re: My career is not in decline, says Federer
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roger Federer
If I can help the game of tennis with the image or with making it more popular, that’s enough for me really. I want to leave the game better off than when I came into this great game
|
|
|
|
05-13-2008, 11:25 PM
|
#50
|
|
_._._._._._
Join Date: Aug 2005
Age: 29
Posts: 72,436
|
Re: A Post and Some Figures Worthy of its Own Thread - Sharing is Caring Guys!
Quote:
Originally Posted by HNCS
This post was found in the guestbook of Rogerfederer.com. and I think it is a very informed post. Of course, all arguements are debatable. But me being not the most eloquent and informed person, i thought i'll share these two posts with everyone.
Probably should post this in one of those million 'roger demise' threads, but i do think that this is worthy of its own thread. Mods might disagree though.
but yeah, hope you guys think it's a good read. and feel free to disagree with it...just don't violently trash this thread. 
|
Thanks so much for posting, really great stuff
Are there any other pearls of wisdom from our neutral friends at rogerfederer.com? 
|
|
|
05-13-2008, 11:27 PM
|
#51
|
|
Fly away little pigeon
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: not on vacation
Posts: 20,460
|
Re: A Post and Some Figures Worthy of its Own Thread - Sharing is Caring Guys!
Quote:
Originally Posted by adee-gee
Thanks so much for posting, really great stuff
Are there any other pearls of wisdom from our neutral friends at rogerfederer.com? 
|
Finally you see the light Adam, I'm so glad  Maybe you can come to RG this year and we can cheer on the king together 
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 09:31 AM
|
#52
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,944
|
Federer, less weight of shot?
Hmm it seems that Fed's weight of shot is not that high as it used to be. Just watching the first half of the year, other younger guys are stronger and more powerful. Ultimately, Fed can be overpowered now. He can't rely on his FH all the time. And he's not in his 21-24yr old "prime" when he was truly supreme and powerful.
One would think that since Fed was "bullied" by Nadal on clay, maybe he can be "Bullied" on a slow grass surface also? Nadal may finally be closing the gap(but i expect Nadal to struggle on hard courts).
Also look at the Monfils match, he was literally overpowering fed for 3 sets. Monfils hopefully(if he keeps his brain) will use this as an inspiration as he is certainly top 10 if he can step up to the baseline(not 2 metres behind!)
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 09:39 AM
|
#53
|
|
Not Banned!
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Antarctica (at heart)
Age: 25
Posts: 16,481
|
Re: Federer, less weight of shot?
Federer is becoming weak because of old age. By the US Open he will be playing with a walking stick if he hasn't retired from tennis already.
__________________
WARNING: This signature may contain extreme traces of clownishness and glory hunting
TOMMY HASS
0 slams (  ) and 0 finals
0 consecutive weeks at world no. 1
0 consecutive Laureus World Sports Awards
0 times qualified for YEC
3-11 H2H against Rogi Featherer
0-5 H2H against Rafito Nadal!
Career low ranking: 1,241 (26.06.1995)
0 fake mullets flaunted in Roland Garros finals.
1 first name in common with Tommy Robredo
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 09:43 AM
|
#54
|
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 124,282
|
Re: Federer, less weight of shot?
Federer is so weak, he is getting overpowered by the Santoros and Volandris of the world.
He will be able to claim his pension soon.
__________________
“ On Nadal bumping him on the changeover, Rosol said: "It's ok, he wanted to take my concentration; I knew he would try something".
Wilander on Dimitrov - "He has mind set on imitating Federer and yes it looks good. But he has no idea what to do on the court".
Quote:
Originally Posted by Filo V.
I definitely would have preferred Gaba winning as he needs the points much more, but Jan would have beaten him anyway. I expect Hajek to destroy Machado, like 6-1 6-2.
|
Machado wins 6-2 6-1
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 09:45 AM
|
#55
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Wales (=
Posts: 1,619
|
Re: Federer, less weight of shot?
In the occasional match he'll hit his FH well like in previous years.
But generally, his FH isn't a dominating shot anymore. Hasn't been since Wimbledon last year. His serve has improved though.
__________________
Federer Express Passenger #163
~♠ Gasquetaires ♠~
un pour tous, tous pour un
Others: Safin - Tursunov - Gonzalez - Berdych - Ancic - Johansson - Youzhny - Cilic - Henman - Karlovic - Mahut
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 10:00 AM
|
#56
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,821
|
Re: Federer, less weight of shot?
So weak he hit a 100+ mph forehand recently.
Don't worry, grass season is here. Federer will suddenly find the ability to hit winners from all over the court again.
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 10:02 AM
|
#57
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Hong Kong
Posts: 19,539
|
Re: Federer, less weight of shot?
its sad to hear that 26 years old is already old, ai, after 4 years, rafa will become an old man too 
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 10:27 AM
|
#58
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Munich
Posts: 11,121
|
Re: Federer, less weight of shot?
Forehand still has it.
Backhand is weak and crap.
__________________
Robin Bo Carl Söderling
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 10:28 AM
|
#59
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Munich
Posts: 11,121
|
Re: Federer, less weight of shot?
Quote:
Originally Posted by mimi
its sad to hear that 26 years old is already old, ai, after 4 years, rafa will become an old man too 
|
By then Roger will be on his pension and playing a with a walking frame.
__________________
Robin Bo Carl Söderling
|
|
|
06-11-2008, 10:32 AM
|
#60
|
|
Cutedey
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 30
Posts: 13,183
|
Re: Federer, less weight of shot?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Halba
Hmm it seems that Fed's weight of shot is not that high as it used to be. Just watching the first half of the year, other younger guys are stronger and more powerful. Ultimately, Fed can be overpowered now. He can't rely on his FH all the time. And he's not in his 21-24yr old "prime" when he was truly supreme and powerful.
One would think that since Fed was "bullied" by Nadal on clay, maybe he can be "Bullied" on a slow grass surface also? Nadal may finally be closing the gap(but i expect Nadal to struggle on hard courts).
Also look at the Monfils match, he was literally overpowering fed for 3 sets. Monfils hopefully(if he keeps his brain) will use this as an inspiration as he is certainly top 10 if he can step up to the baseline(not 2 metres behind!)
|
Look, Federer is an old fart. I noticed liver spots on his hand when I was checking out his forehand grip.
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|