 |
|
11-07-2007, 11:43 PM
|
#166
|
|
................
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Somewhere that's too hot
Posts: 5,237
|
Re: Federer vs Nadal ranking points (First post always updated)
Quote:
Originally Posted by elessar
Wonder what we'll call him when he starts winning GASP.... only 1 or 2 slams a year  |
Fat Rog or Roger Faterer  |
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 02:02 AM
|
#167
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,922
|
Re: Federer vs Nadal ranking points (First post always updated)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marek P.
Fat Rog or Roger Faterer |
fat nose fed.
i think thats what tangerine dream came up with and riles up all the federer fans. 
__________________
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.
-Richard Feynman
|
|
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 01:39 PM
|
#168
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HONG KONG
Posts: 25,340
|
Re: Federer vs Nadal ranking points (First post always updated)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marek P.
Fat Rog or Roger Faterer |
Roger is a little bit fat now~~~~ 
the designer in Shanghai said that he use the size of Roger last year to make the clothes, but now Roger wear it, is a little bit too small~~!!!  |
|
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 02:03 PM
|
#169
|
|
Anathemaniac
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Wall.
Posts: 41,910
|
Re: Federer vs Nadal ranking points (First post always updated)
Quote:
Originally Posted by SUKTUEN
Roger is a little bit fat now~~~~
the designer in Shanghai said that he use the size of Roger last year to make the clothes, but now Roger wear it, is a little bit too small~~!!! |
I'd like to think he rather gained some muscles than that he actually became more 'fat'  - he looks very well in shape to me! |
|
|
|
|
11-08-2007, 02:11 PM
|
#170
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HONG KONG
Posts: 25,340
|
Re: Federer vs Nadal ranking points (First post always updated)
Quote:
Originally Posted by ClayBuzza
I'd like to think he rather gained some muscles than that he actually became more 'fat' - he looks very well in shape to me! |
Of course he also very fit in body~~~ 
He is just more strong than last year~~~~  |
|
|
|
|
11-19-2007, 10:34 AM
|
#171
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Age: 38
Posts: 2,142
|
Re: Federer vs Nadal ranking points (First post always updated)
Updated for the year 2007.
|
|
|
|
|
11-19-2007, 02:02 PM
|
#172
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HONG KONG
Posts: 25,340
|
Re: Federer vs Nadal ranking points (First post always updated)
thankyou so much!!
|
|
|
|
|
11-26-2007, 10:51 PM
|
#173
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,922
|
Re: Federer vs Nadal ranking points (First post always updated)
Good stuff blue swan.
I have said this before and will say again. Fit Dave is federer's greatest rival at the AO. I can't see anyone else beating an inform federer. David is now 9? So he could run into him at the 16 stage. 
It would be a huge pity for federer if nadal became #1 for like a week. 
__________________
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.
-Richard Feynman
|
|
|
|
|
11-27-2007, 10:37 AM
|
#174
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HONG KONG
Posts: 25,340
|
Re: Federer vs Nadal ranking points (First post always updated)
hope Roger keep his NO.1 site over 300 weeks!
|
|
|
|
|
11-29-2007, 11:27 PM
|
#175
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Somewhere fairly shingly
Age: 28
Posts: 11,347
|
Re: Federer vs Nadal ranking points (First post always updated)
Quote:
Originally Posted by World Beater
Good stuff blue swan.
I have said this before and will say again. Fit Dave is federer's greatest rival at the AO. I can't see anyone else beating an inform federer. David is now 9? So he could run into him at the 16 stage.
It would be a huge pity for federer if nadal became #1 for like a week. |
Nope, 9-12 meet 5-8 in the round of 16, it wouldn't be until at least the quarters. With their history in Slams though, that's probably exactly what will happen.... I still remember my disbelief at the 2004 AO draw as every single nemesis emerged in Federer's quarter. Mind you, that had a very happy result in the end.
__________________
The Wit and Wisdom of the Tennis Journalist, Indian Wells 2004
ROGER FEDERER: Yeah, I remember this one time when I went on a vacation on the Maldives. That was in the year 2001, I think. I went to this spa. I went to walk around with my girlfriend. I walk in, and we want to book a spa. This guy goes, "AHH, I remember you. You beat Sampras. I saw you on TV." That was like, really, how can you remember me? This guy has probably never been off his island and still knows me. I was a little bit shocked. Then I went to play tennis with him because he was actually the tennis teacher. It was nice.
Q. Were you naked at the time in the spa?
ROGER FEDERER: No. It was at the front desk. I didn't walk in naked.
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2007, 03:23 PM
|
#176
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 4,922
|
Re: Federer vs Nadal ranking points (First post always updated)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sjengster
Nope, 9-12 meet 5-8 in the round of 16, it wouldn't be until at least the quarters. With their history in Slams though, that's probably exactly what will happen.... I still remember my disbelief at the 2004 AO draw as every single nemesis emerged in Federer's quarter. Mind you, that had a very happy result in the end.
|
hmm. i wonder why the draw is done like that.
9-16 are hypothetically all the losers in 4th round. They should be able to play anyone of 1-8. Random? 
if this was the case, might as well have 1 always 4 and 2 always play 3 in the semis.
__________________
There are 10^11 stars in the galaxy. That used to be a huge number. But it's only a hundred billion. It's less than the national deficit! We used to call them astronomical numbers. Now we should call them economical numbers.
-Richard Feynman
|
|
|
|
|
11-30-2007, 04:32 PM
|
#177
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: HONG KONG
Posts: 25,340
|
Re: Federer vs Nadal ranking points (First post always updated)
but Roger won less championship this year, so he have less pressure for keep points next year~~~
|
|
|
|
|
12-01-2007, 02:24 PM
|
#178
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Age: 39
Posts: 11,529
|
Re: Federer vs Nadal ranking points (First post always updated)
Quote:
Originally Posted by World Beater
hmm. i wonder why the draw is done like that.
9-16 are hypothetically all the losers in 4th round. They should be able to play anyone of 1-8. Random?
if this was the case, might as well have 1 always 4 and 2 always play 3 in the semis. |
Well the old system used to be 1 vs 16, 2 vs 15, 3 vs 14 etc... and the current system retains some of the advantages of this. Of course it's possible but I suppose it isn't really plausable that places 5-12 won't be changing around a bit so the same people won't always play each other. It is a reward for a higher ranking, reach the top 12 and you won't have to face a top 4 player till the quarters. Reach the top 4 and you won't have to play a top 12 player till the quarters.
__________________
 Champions deserve whatever they win playing within the laws of the game
|
|
|
|
|
12-12-2007, 05:01 PM
|
#179
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Age: 29
Posts: 5
|
Re: Federer vs Nadal ranking points (First post always updated)
Hello,
Can someone please put up Djokovics rankings in the first page for a comparison of all 3 players.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
12-12-2007, 10:43 PM
|
#180
|
|
Anathemaniac
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: The Wall.
Posts: 41,910
|
Re: Federer vs Nadal ranking points (First post always updated)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darth Djokovic
Hello,
Can someone please put up Djokovics rankings in the first page for a comparison of all 3 players.
Thanks.
|
There's a thread comparing ALL the (top) players' rankings in GM.
And as you're not exactly a fan of Feds, judging from your posts so far (welcome back, R=FK! ), why don't you look there first? |
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
Federer's ranking discussion
Into music of the PROG-Dorky-kind? visit 
