[rocketassist]

Everybody should just put MIMIC on ignore.

[Tag]

swiss frauds like choking match points and and break points in 5th sets

it makes losses more 'heroic'

and of course

it means they get to steal love

and media admiration from the actual winners

even when they lose

[Dolgopolover]

Declinerer looks done.

Consecutive loses to Birdman?

[Saberq]

Originally Posted by rocketassist

Everybody should just put MIMIC on ignore.

I like MIMIC Moozza on the other hand should be on ignore but I am afraid I am going to miss some of his bullshit

[Honestly]

Originally Posted by GSMnadal

That you can't see that he's hurting, doesn't mean he isn't. Nadal is always breathing hard and sweating profusely, does he have poor endurance?

Federer has great endurance, but not compared to the likes of Djokovic, Nadal and Ferrer.

Couldn't have said it better myself. Bravo. Mimic give it up old sport. And stop making ridiculous statements.

[Honestly]

Originally Posted by rocketassist

Everybody should just put MIMIC on ignore.

Not a bad idea and Tagmug as well.

[Corey Feldman]

Originally Posted by rocketassist

Fed's worst excuse was the Berdych 2010 Wimbledon loss.

but how is it? Fed had clearly done something to his hamstring in the Halle final v Hewitt, i mean you think its normal he's a point away from losing in straight sets v Falla in 1st round that year?

do you need pics of the taping that was on his thigh during that Wimbledon run?

[leng jai]

Originally Posted by MIMIC

Did I change the definition?

But back to my original point: People always quick to point to Federer's age when he loses despite his incredible, unprecedented endurance, whereas NO ONE blames Ferrer's losses on his age. Why is that?

The great and almighty Roger Federer is more susceptible to age than an inferior David Ferrer? I don't think so.

Ferrer didn't reach his peak until very late in his career while Federer started his peak 9 years ago. Are you really this dense? Ferrer is playing at his top level while Federer is clearly significantly worse than he was 4 years ago. Are you really this dense? How good is Djokovic going to be in 5 years?

[rocketassist]

Originally Posted by Corey Feldman

but how is it? Fed had clearly done something to his hamstring in the Halle final v Hewitt, i mean you think its normal he's a point away from losing in straight sets v Falla in 1st round that year?

do you need pics of the taping that was on his thigh during that Wimbledon run?

He didn't play great, his forehand had a shaky day and Berdych bullied him. Shit happens. But that's the only time I can recall him being a sourpuss.

[MIMIC]

Originally Posted by Sophocles

[b]The fallacy here is in assuming how great you are determines your susceptibility to ageing. Greatness in respects A, B, C, & D does NOT entail greatness in respect Z. To put it starkly, I think we can probably agree Shakespeare was a greater dramatist than George Bernard Shaw. Yet at age 60, Bernard Shaw was still writing plays, while Shakespeare - was dead.

I'm talking about aging in the context of "DECLINING"....aka: The great and almighty Roger Federer is more susceptible to [a decline because of his] age than an inferior David Ferrer?.

Age in relation to QUALITY....not the literal process of "getting older"

Ferrer peaked at an older age than Federer did. Simple as that.

That's my point. AGE does not preclude someone from playing as well or even better than they had in years prior. And such is seen in Ferrer. Blaming all of Federer's losses solely on his age is bogus.

Originally Posted by rocketassist

Everybody should just put MIMIC on ignore.

Then do it. Jesus. No need to make an announcement.

[redshift36188]

This thread still lives?!

[Prodigy.]

Originally Posted by Corey Feldman

but how is it? Fed had clearly done something to his hamstring in the Halle final v Hewitt, i mean you think its normal he's a point away from losing in straight sets v Falla in 1st round that year?

do you need pics of the taping that was on his thigh during that Wimbledon run?

Oh god you've really reached new lows making excuses for Federer's losses that happened years ago.

You do know that several players have taping on body parts, or support, and still win slams? Stop with the cry baby injury excuses. Fed is human after all, he does lose (without injuries)

[star]

I was thinking the same. it's a new tournament already. Fed will probably win it and then the dancing and the gnashing will turn around and everyone will forget what they said in this thread. Or at least pretend they forgot v

[Prodigy.]

Originally Posted by star

I was thinking the same. it's a new tournament already. Fed will probably win it and then the dancing and the gnashing will turn around and everyone will forget what they said in this thread. Or at least pretend they forgot v

Apart from Feldman of course, who will show up in here every week to make a fail fanboy crying excuse and then tell Roger to retire.

[Kyle_Johansen]

Originally Posted by star

I was thinking the same. it's a new tournament already. Fed will probably win it and then the dancing and the gnashing will turn around and everyone will forget what they said in this thread. Or at least pretend they forgot v

Pretty much. Fed wins or makes the final in IW and nobody will be talking about his great form and how he proved us all wrong again.