[Lestat]

Originally Posted by Corey Feldman

his 'computer breaks' after Nadal loses matches

yeap, it's some kind of auto safe-mode to prevent MTFers when Null loses.

[abraxas21]

zeballos

[DJ Soup]

Originally Posted by GSMnadal

Why? Are only elitist Fedtards allowed to call a player the greatest of all time?

In my opinion Rafa is the greatest to ever play this game, a far greater competitor than Federer ever was. Numbers can lie due to difference in competition and injuries.

But let's stop this before this thread derails

GSMnadal, you don't seem to learn:

Nadal's success and injuries are RELATED.

His gamestyle gave him his success.
His gamestyle gave him his injuries (and expiration date).

That's why Federer is GREATER than Nadal. He has even more success and hardly ever was injured (only mono (disease) hold him back for a while). Federer has a greater longevity than Nadal as well. And has been awesome during all eras in which he was relevant (thus why he has the longest stay as Nº1)


ps: btw Nadal lost to Zeballos. lol

[StatRacket]

Originally Posted by Mark Lenders

Nadal might have won Roland Garros 7 times, but I have a feeling things would have been quite different if he had faced Zeballos in any of those years, as I'm sure will be exposed tomorrow. Zeballos in 2, no tiebreaks.

2010 Roland Garros R2, Nadal d. Zeballos 6-2 6-2 6-3.

[pray-for-palestine-and-israel]

Originally Posted by Topspindoctor

Zeballos is a challenger level clown, Nadal is a legend and GOAT. Nadal will gift his pathetic opponent 2-3 games if he's feeling merciful. Double bagel otherwise.

So quote worthy

El-oh-el