On winning DC and its overall importance in the discussion for all-time greats
Originally Posted by Orbis
Davis Cup should never have really mattered in the GOAT discussion anyway since it's a team event. If you're talking about the GOAT singles player then you should mainly look at individual results. If some unknown talent came out of some random tiny country (no chance to win DC) and won 20 slams, no one would give a single shit if that player didn't have DC. The fact is, success in DC is largely determined by what country you come from or play for in the first place, which most players haven't had any control over.
. Is that why, Djokovic copied Fed and now has his line of tops for each slam? Sometimes I wonder...
What does this have to do with style? "Girlie" is an adjective to the outfit. It described the sytle of the outfit. No problem to have a line of outfit designed after you as long as it's good and fit your personality. I have no problem with Fed has his line of clothes as long as they fit him But what fits him does not mean will fit Nole.
how classy Novak looks even when he is joking around
Djoker = GOAT
DelPo = Purger of the Vultures
Hewitt = Llegend
Iron STan = Saviour of tennis Villains
Nadull - moonballer with zero talent
Ferrer - Talentless Vulture
Tomic - overrated mug who will never win anything big
Originally Posted by SliceAce
Basically, Queerey is a disgrace to the human race.