Wilander just said Murray is a better tennis player but Djokovic has better movement, more dangerous. Murray is more of a player, more a talent. Murray plays the game but what Djokovic does is not to do with tennis like Federer while Murray is like Nadal.
I have so many questions about those ideas!
No way pusher like Simon can beat Grinder like Murray.
Simply he doesnt have weapons to do that.
“Does Djokovic resemble myself?” Agassi said. “No, he is even better. He defends really well, while I struggled more in that element of the game. Novak looks totally relaxed when defending, completely calm and the quality of his return is incredible. He is also extremely flexible in his game, which is facilitated by his ability to anticipate his rival’s moves. That is why I think he is a much more versatile player than I was and he is also much more athletic.”
if ever there was a result that was NID.... might aswell have given a walkover Simon
Them greats:Jerzy Janowicz - Benoit Paire - Philipp Kohlschreiber - Tommy Haas - Aleksandr Dolgopolov - David Nalbandian - Nicolas Mahut - Marcos Baghdatis - Jeremy Chardy - Ernests Gulbis
Them goods:Michael Llodra - Novak Djokovic - Roger Federer - Grigor Dimitrov - Kei Nishikori - Fabio Fognini - Mikhail Youzhny - Kevin Anderson - Jurgen Melzer - Florian Mayer - Stanislas Wawrinka - Daniel Brands
Them who make me wanna throw stuff at my tv: Marcel Granollers - Thiemo de Bakker - Albert Ramos - Ryan Harrison - David Ferrer - Andy Murray
Obviously... why would he try now when Simon is running on empty?
Strategically, maybe it makes sense to save his best, but people have paid money to come and watch and they deserve more than a half-arsed effort., Why does he not try his best and show them some quality tennis?