[Looner]

Originally Posted by duong

Kudryavtsev, Beck being the same as Paire/Davydenko ??

Karlovic as Tomic ?

I was talking about Tomic beating RF in a direct response to an earlier post .

[GSMnadal]

Originally Posted by Orka_n

Imbecille. Read my other posts in this thread.

Already resorting to calling people imbecille, are we. This draw hit hard in the fedcamp

[EliSter]

Originally Posted by Kei_is_a_samurai

I just threw up

I feel you mate, Feddy potentialy loosing his QF strake made me sick and dizzy.

[Orka_n]

Originally Posted by janko05

When exactly?

Most people thought he would never win a slam again before Wimby 12. I was one of them.

Originally Posted by GSMnadal

Already resorting to calling people imbecille, are we. This draw hit hard in the fedcamp

I already said I don't care about the difficulty of the draw and that Fed will probably reach at least the semis. Stop grasping at straws and go troll elsewhere you clown.

[Destructor]

Roger has received many tough draws in the past, been doubted, and always come through. I don't see why this time won't be any different.

[Prodigy.]

My reference about dull and Andy was losing to mugs in the early rounds

[janko05]

Originally Posted by Orka_n

Most people thought he would never win a slam again before Wimby 12. I was one of them.

Yeah, but that was BC, we are talking recent history

[GSMnadal]

Originally Posted by Destructor

Roger has received many tough draws in the past, been doubted, and always come through. I don't see why this time won't be any different.

Say what now?

[duong]

Originally Posted by HKz

Not sure Paire would really be able to do anything, Federer destroyed him Basel a couple of months ago.

you know Paire : what he did one day doesn't mean anything for what he can do another day, he has a perfect game to annoy Fed if he's in a great day, and his form looked good in Chennai.

Originally Posted by HKz

Davydenko showed great form in Doha, but we have to remember, the only two wins Nikolay has had over Federer was during that stretch where Federer wasn't playing near his best while Davydenko was definitely hitting top form, yet Davy was only able to take one set off Federer in Australia that year (albeit it was a pretty tight match but Davydenko never took 100% control anyways)..

Davydenko was leading 6-1 + break, hard in my eyes not to call it controlling a match.

Originally Posted by HKz

Klizan would be much more interesting against Federer than Tomic. He definitely has a great lefty game and can overpower Roger while Tomic will be "out varied" by Federer like their other matches.

both can be dangerous, they're emerging players and we don't know their potential yet, especially Tomic.

Originally Posted by HKz

If Raonic and Federer play during a night session and if courts are slow as they usually are, Raonic shouldn't be able to do much. His QF should be easy for him as well, however, I doubt it will be either Tsonga or Gasquet that play Federer..

These next rounds are quite good draws for Fed and I don't fear Raonic much here.

[Orka_n]

Originally Posted by janko05

Yeah, but that was BC, we are talking recent history

Who are "we"? I was the one who said it Einstein, so I think I know what I was referring to. And it was only half a year ago.

[janko05]

Originally Posted by Orka_n

Who are "we"? I was the one who said it Einstein, so I think I know what I was referring to. And it was only half a year ago.

So, you doubted him before Wimby 12 and that was half a year ago?

[Matt01]

Originally Posted by Orka_n

I already said I don't care about the difficulty of the draw and that Fed will probably reach at least the semis. Stop grasping at straws and go troll elsewhere you clown.

I see you are already nervous and angry about the draw

[HKz]

Originally Posted by duong

you know Paire : what he did one day doesn't mean anything for what he can do another day, he has a perfect game to annoy Fed if he's in a great day, and his form looked good in Chennai.



Davydenko was leading 6-1 + break, hard in my eyes not to call it controlling a match.



both can be dangerous, they're emerging players and we don't know their potential yet, especially Tomic.



These next rounds are quite good draws for Fed and I don't fear Raonic much here.

Paire is talented, but he has yet to show any real potential in best of 5 set matches. Not to mention it is a first round, I'm sure Paire will be quite nervous despite having plenty of matches under his belt.

I know the scoreline. Sure, Davy was controlling the match, but it wasn't anywhere near his for the taking even up a break in the second. Berdych in 2009 against Federer was more in control.

Despite Australia being his first slight success at the slams, Federer is much more suited here..

[janko05]

Originally Posted by Orka_n

Who are "we"? I was the one who said it Einstein, so I think I know what I was referring to. And it was only half a year ago.

The fact is Fed was never in doubt for SF,F or even W, and I don't see a single reason why should be different this time.

[Orka_n]

Originally Posted by janko05

So, you doubted him before Wimby 12 and that was half a year ago?

Yes. Was that too complicated?

Originally Posted by janko05

The fact is Fed was never in doubt for SF,F or even W, and I don't see a single reason why should be different this time.

Neither do I, which I have already said twice in this thread.

Originally Posted by Matt01

I see you are already nervous and angry about the draw

The only thing I'm annoyed by is that I'm surrounded by morons in this place. I told you before Matty, you're not smart enough to have a go at me. Your insults do not take because you don't understand me.

I do find it a little funny to see all the Fedhaters in this thread, they come in here and actually whine a lot more than most Fedtards.