Originally Posted by GOATsol
I think the argument is that WTF>Olympics.
Also, you have to look at other tournaments when it's so close (4 different grand slam winners).
Yes, there were 4 different grand slam winners. But that doesn't mean it was close.
Nole won 1 grand slam and made the finals of 2 others.
Murray won 1 grand slam and made the final of 1 other.
Novak won 3 masters 1000 and made the finals of 3 others
Andy won 0 masters 1000 and made the finals of 2.
Nole won a 500 event (Beijing), Andy won a 250 event (Brisbane)
Nole won the WTF, beating 5 top 8 players consecutively, including Andy and Roger. Andy won the Olympic gold, beating 2 top 8 players consecutively: Novak and Roger.
6 titles to 3.
Not to mention that in total Nole won 12920 points and Andy 8000, that is, Nole won 61.5% more than Andy.
Why are we even arguing about this? This is not close at all.
Or is this thread a joke as well and I didn't get it?