View Poll Results: Ranking system?
|
|
Current system (1000, 500, 300, 200, 120, 90)
|
 
|
26 |
61.90% |
|
ATP system (2000, 1000, 500, 250, 125, 90)
|
 
|
16 |
38.10% |
| Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll |
 |
|
10-28-2012, 10:21 PM
|
#16
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,448
|
Re: TT 2012 - Ranking System?
I like it as it is, I don't like the current ATP point system. 
__________________
Entry List / Draw Maker: eldmaker.tennistipping.p.ht
TT Live Rankings: rankings.tennistipping.p.ht
Tennis Tipping
Best ranking:
Singles: 132 (18/06/2012)
Doubles: 88 (15/10/2012)
Best performances:
Singles: W: Fergana CH 2012 RU: Nottingham 2 CH 2012
Doubles:
W: Poznan CH 2011 - Gstaad ATP 2012 (w. volc0mizado) - Heillbron CH 2012 - Le Gosier CH 2012 (w. supertec)
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
10-30-2012, 10:03 PM
|
#17
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,438
|
Re: TT 2012 - Ranking System?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfar
I like it as it is, I don't like the current ATP point system. 
|
Why not?
__________________
TT Singles Rank: 160
Best singles rank: 157
Best singles results: W Tunis CH 13, F Wolfsburg CH 12.
Suicide tennis rank: 54
PAW rank: 57
FITD rank: 83
|
|
|
10-30-2012, 10:18 PM
|
#18
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,448
|
Re: TT 2012 - Ranking System?
Because there is a huge point difference between big events and Challengers. And for real tennis it may be Ok, but not for TT.
__________________
Entry List / Draw Maker: eldmaker.tennistipping.p.ht
TT Live Rankings: rankings.tennistipping.p.ht
Tennis Tipping
Best ranking:
Singles: 132 (18/06/2012)
Doubles: 88 (15/10/2012)
Best performances:
Singles: W: Fergana CH 2012 RU: Nottingham 2 CH 2012
Doubles:
W: Poznan CH 2011 - Gstaad ATP 2012 (w. volc0mizado) - Heillbron CH 2012 - Le Gosier CH 2012 (w. supertec)
|
|
|
10-30-2012, 10:24 PM
|
#19
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,438
|
Re: TT 2012 - Ranking System?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfar
Because there is a huge point difference between big events and Challengers. And for real tennis it may be Ok, but not for TT.
|
So you want everyone on a more level playing field is that it, I get it, but on the other hand, I think if you are ranked in the top 50, you should not be playing CH's in TT, that's what I call unfair to the lower ranked players if you want to use the same logic you just said about the ranking points.
__________________
TT Singles Rank: 160
Best singles rank: 157
Best singles results: W Tunis CH 13, F Wolfsburg CH 12.
Suicide tennis rank: 54
PAW rank: 57
FITD rank: 83
Last edited by J99 : 10-31-2012 at 02:17 PM.
|
|
|
10-31-2012, 07:24 AM
|
#20
|
|
TT BOARD MEMBER
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Brighton, UK
Posts: 9,491
|
Re: TT 2012 - Ranking System?
Quote:
Originally Posted by sfar
Because there is a huge point difference between big events and Challengers. And for real tennis it may be Ok, but not for TT.
|
I voted for staying with the current system for the same reason. It's tough enough for players to get out of Challengers as it is - a change would make it even tougher for Challenger level players.
__________________
Tennis Tipping
Singles (Rank : 90) (High : 87)
TITLES (2) : 2010 - CH Rhodes, 2012 - ATP Beijing
2013 - QF ATP Brisbane, ATP Sao Paolo, 2R ATP Montpellier, ATP Monte Carlo, ATP Barcelona
Doubles (Rank : 5) (High : 5)
TITLES (10) : (w/GoBlakeGo) 2009 - CH Izmir, (w/Pavkata) 2009 - CH Trani, CH Banja Luka, CH Quito, 2010 - CH Sao Paolo, (w/BrunoBeidacki) 2011 - CH Athens, CH Santos, CH Astana, 2012 - CH Monza, ATP Paris, RU - FRENCH OPEN
2013 - RU ATP Montpellier, ATP Miami, SF ATP Marseille, ATP Munich, QF ATP Brisbane, ATP Sao Paolo
TT Board Member - since Aug 2012 - w/keqtqiadv, Mahqz, Marto & ibreak4coffee
|
|
|
11-12-2012, 09:18 PM
|
#21
|
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Feb 2008
Age: 27
Posts: 5,174
|
I am saying it here again, i think it would be nice to have the same breakdown as the atp. Than youreally feel like you play there. But i agree on the transition year. So this year maintain the ranking and meanwhile start up the new system. Otherwise it would be not fair.
Sent from my iPhone using Verticalsports.com Free App
__________________
Member of Suicide tennis board!
|
|
|
11-13-2012, 11:44 AM
|
#22
|
|
A ROSE AT SUNSET
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 29,734
|
Re: TT 2012 - Ranking System?
I voted to keep it the same. If it isn't broken, it doesn't need to be fixed.
|
|
|
11-13-2012, 12:18 PM
|
#23
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 480
|
Re: TT 2012 - Ranking System?
TT is pretty random, especially in the late stages, so giving as many points to a single match win as in ATP isn't really great.
Example: in a GS Final - picking the winner of 3 IRL matches - using ATP system there will be a difference of 800 points between winner and loser. Which is the same as the difference between going 17-1 and 0-4 in a month of 250s. 
|
|
|
11-19-2012, 03:06 PM
|
#24
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 354
|
Re: TT 2012 - Ranking System?
The Atp system is quite unfair to early stages and I think difference between champion and Runner up is way too big. We may adjust some points definitely. It doesn't make much sense that a CH titlist gets almost the same points as runner up in ATP 250. Perhaps a 100 and 80 points for challenger instead than the ones 120 and 90 we have.
Anyhow, I don't agree changing to the ATP ranking system but we must make some adjustments
__________________
TT Ranking
Singles: 230 (High 240 May 06 - 2013)
Doubles: 117 (High 125 May 06 - 2013)
Singles: RU: 2013 Salinas CH
Doubles: W: 2012 Villa Allende CH; 2012 Guayaquil CH
RU: '13 Chennai '12 Tashkent CH; '12 Buenos Aires CH; '12 Marbella CH (all with SamR03A)
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|