[156mphserve]

I just suggested 5 as an example, if the majority agreed that 3 would suffice then that would be fine.

[J99]

No Sui for the coming week?

[Marto]

Nothing personal to you 156mphserve, but it's very stupid to make a new board members and to ignore the old one

[rvugt]

Originally Posted by J99

No Sui for the coming week?

There should be!

[156mphserve]

Originally Posted by Marto

Nothing personal to you 156mphserve, but it's very stupid to make a new board members and to ignore the old one

I believe I PMed all the old board members, and those who replied wanting to retain their position did, or they were nominated anyway, and had that choice to retain their position.

If I forgot someone(I couldn't find a list anywhere of the old board) then I apologize and offer said old board member a position on the new board, that would create 6 members however, so we'd probably have to add another after that to keep it odd.

[156mphserve]

That being said, the nominations thread was open for maybe 2 weeks at least, you could have nominated yourself and been up for a position on the board, so old board members could have done that if I forgot them

[J99]

No poll for next week's Sui?

[Litotes]

Originally Posted by J99

No poll for next week's Sui?

Do we need one? There's one ATP500 and two ATP250s. I'll always vote for a 500 over 250s regardless of other circumstances. Always assumed polls were just for tournaments of equal value, such as this week with three ATP250s.

[J99]

Originally Posted by Litotes

Do we need one? There's one ATP500 and two ATP250s. I'll always vote for a 500 over 250s regardless of other circumstances. Always assumed polls were just for tournaments of equal value, such as this week with three ATP250s.

Oh right, ok.

[rvugt]

Originally Posted by Litotes

Do we need one? There's one ATP500 and two ATP250s. I'll always vote for a 500 over 250s regardless of other circumstances. Always assumed polls were just for tournaments of equal value, such as this week with three ATP250s.

That is indeed the case!

[Marto]

Originally Posted by J99

No poll for next week's Sui?

You can see the calendar which I post in managers thread, if theu are more than 1 tournament we have pool


Sent from Verticalsports.com Free App

[J99]

Originally Posted by Marto

You can see the calendar which I post in managers thread, if theu are more than 1 tournament we have pool


Sent from Verticalsports.com Free App

I see that for week 9 it says just Dubai, when another 500 Acapulco is that week too, I see other weeks with just 1 tourney when there are more of the same level as well.

[bry17may]

Originally Posted by J99

I see that for week 9 it says just Dubai, when another 500 Acapulco is that week too, I see other weeks with just 1 tourney when there are more of the same level as well.

I guees that you are viewing the right thread, this is for 2013 http://www.menstennisforums.com/showthread.php?t=213734

[Litotes]

In the current IW tournament Rafael Nadal was discounted as a legal pick because his opponent left a WO. This happened after the deadline. I am not complaining, I would just like a clarification by those in the know. What needs to be done for the match to count? They must play exactly one point and then it's OK? What if they warm up and one of them injures himself? Will that count?

Also, a tournament with a WO in the final will never produce a winner? Or is the final an exeption to this WO rule?

[CoolyBri]

At least one point needs to be played for a match to be valid for Suicide Tennis, yes.
So if there is a walkover in the final there can't be anyone winning the title; that's correct, too.