[Johnbert]

Originally Posted by GSMnadal

Hilarious comment.

Nadal has the greatest forehand in tennis

yes, that's really hilarious

[out_grinder]

Originally Posted by Saberq

Hey Sapeod do you think all of us here are saying Murray is a pusher for fun?If every single living person on this forum says he is a pusher then he is a pusher

This forum is ridiculous, and not something that tennis fans should be proud of.

If every single living person on this forum says that every single living tennis player is a talentless mug vulturing in a weak era (which they do) - then it is obviously the case.

[buzz]

Murray is really talented. He is strong, tall, very fast and can hit very solid groundstrokes even on the run and out of balance. With this traits he can neutralize or hit an outright winner from positions where nearly every other player in top100 has no chance. He is not in the top10% of tacticians out of the top100 in my opinion.

Especially his mental tactics suck! how can somebody be a tactical genius when he screams that he is sick and uncertain etc, or am I mistaking and are these tantrums designed to put the opponent on a wrong foot?

[krakenzero]

Put in a court a shotmaker at his best against a tactician at his best. Then you'll have your answer. For me it's clear.

[GSMnadal]

Originally Posted by Johnbert

yes, that's really hilarious

It's the one shot the so called 'GOAT' never had an answer to. A shot that gave him Clay GOATness, 11 slams, Olympic gold etc. etc.

[out_grinder]

Tennis is a simple sport that attracts simple people who want to see a ball being hit very hard, lots of aces and nothing more.

Tacticians have no place in the sport of tennis.

[Lestat]

Originally Posted by Sapeod

You should give up then. From your posts, I can tell you don't understand much of anything so trying to understand me won't work.

When what I have to reply to is, for the most part, nonsense, it deserves the response it gets.

As I said, if something is garbage, it's treated as such.

I actually prefer red to green.

Perhaps because he's not a pusher and anyone who says so is wrong? You don't need to call him a tactician if you don't want to (he is though), but he is very obviously not a pusher.

Laughing at the suggestion that Andy is a tactician is insulting. He's nothing but a tactician.

And, what a surprise, you're wrong. Don't even compare Del Potro's "tactics" to Andy's. That's insulting and nonsense.

the biggest insult here is mugray winning a GS being a non-tactician pusher helped by wind. Biggest disgrace for tennis. Tennis died last september.

[Sapeod]

Originally Posted by Topspindoctor

The most hilarious thing is that Crapeod was actually a fan of Del Potro and predicted he would win RG 2012. Later on, he edited his posts, changed the topic title and started calling him brainless/one dimensional etc. Bandwagoning at its finest.

I bandwagoned him when he was injured and then I came off it before he started playing again. I admit though it was stupid. I can't remember why I even did that.

Originally Posted by Mountaindewslave

because they're less boring to watch. simple as that. we decided what we like based on how it looks.

Originally Posted by atennisfan

Because it is more entertaining to watch.

If you think watching a ball getting smacked over and over again the same way is more entertaining than smart, tactical tennis then that's your problem.

Originally Posted by Lestat

Yes, he is highly disliked here because of his troubles with DelPotro when they were junior. and because he is ugly as hell.

That's a legit reason to hate someone. Are all people from Argentina like this or is it just the ones on here?

Originally Posted by Lestat

the biggest insult here is mugray winning a GS being a non-tactician pusher helped by wind. Biggest disgrace for tennis. Tennis died last september.

Pusher? Wrong. Non-tactician? Wrong. Helped by wind? Wrong, he was also playing in the wind in case you didn't know. Tennis died then? Wrong. Biggest disgrace in tennis? Wrong.

Congratulations, you said 5 incorrect things in a row in 2 sentences. That's quite impressive.

[Your Majesty]

Originally Posted by Mark Lenders

Making things happen > waiting for errors.

Besides, in this slow court era, there's much more merit in succeeding with a big hitting style than with an all-out defending/grinding style, to which the conditions are perfectly suited.

This.

I also don't think Andy is A pusher, just an all around fella who's at his most confortable playing defensive tennis, I see that a lot whenever the opponent starts turning the tables, his natural reaction has been of switching to that pushing style. I do think that he's got quite the offensive game, a very fine one.

[Lestat]

Originally Posted by Sapeod

I bandwagoned him when he was injured and then I came off it before he started playing again. I admit though it was stupid. I can't remember why I even did that.



If you think watching a ball getting smacked over and over again the same way is more entertaining than smart, tactical tennis then that's your problem.

That's a legit reason to hate someone. Are all people from Argentina like this or is it just the ones on here?

Pusher? Wrong. Non-tactician? Wrong. Helped by wind? Wrong, he was also playing in the wind in case you didn't know. Tennis died then? Wrong. Biggest disgrace in tennis? Wrong.

Congratulations, you said 5 incorrect things in a row in 2 sentences. That's quite impressive.

Im always astonished with your arguments, you never change brateod