[GSMnadal]

Originally Posted by MuzzahLovah

Wasn't Nadal injured???

He definitely was, but an injured Nadal >>>>>>>>>> Berdych+ that Djoker look-a-like in the 2012 final.

[rocketassist]

They both deserved the slam.

/thread

[MuzzahLovah]

Originally Posted by GSMnadal

He definitely was, but an injured Nadal >>>>>>>>>> Berdych+ that Djoker look-a-like in the 2012 final.

[Matt01]

They both deserved their Slam but Delpo was more impressive.

[Noleta]

Murray deserved to win a slam,after coming near it so many times,but Del Potro's win was very impressive,beating Rafa and Fed back to back in a slam isn't easy to do.

[MIMIC]

Originally Posted by MTwEeZi

Murray's Olympic gold was more impressive than his USO.

The so-called GOAT was roasted on his favourite surface at his favourite court playing his favourite opponent in BO5 finals while his favourite fan Looney could do nothing but helplessly watch.

Absolutely. He annihilated Fed in that final. His performance during the entire tournament was both more impressive and convincing than what happened at the U.S. Open.

[Looner]

Originally Posted by MIMIC

Absolutely. He annihilated Fed in that final. His performance during the entire tournament was both more impressive and convincing than what happened at the U.S. Open.

Stick to the topic.

PS Stay pressed.

[Tag]

Originally Posted by redshift36188

Definitely DelPo, as Murray got a ballbasher under extreme wind on his SF and benefited from more rest in the Final to outgrind his opponent in the 5th set.

Yes, Murray's past achievements do make up for this fluke but that is not the question.

djokovic a ballbasher


del potro faced doublefaulterer in that 2009 final

he had the match handed to him by doublefaulterer's choking

emotionalabuserer cried and swore for roddick, but still lost the match

murray had to beat an in form berdych (who only shows up against olderer) in the semis, and beat both the wind and the best hard court player in the world in the final

murray's is more impressive, easily

[MIMIC]

Originally Posted by Looner

Stick to the topic.

PS Stay pressed.

I'm "pressed", yet I commend Murray of a successful tournament....a tournament in which he also beat Djokovic.

To lash out any time someone talks about Federer being destroyed in the Olympic final speaks volumes about your immaturity and insecurities.

[Johnny Groove]

They were both deserving.

Del Potro's was more impressive.

[rocketassist]

Murray deffo played a lot better at Wimbledon and Olympics than in NY. If he'd won the first two rather than the last two it would have been more impressive.

Both Djokovic and Federer were more than a bit shit in their respective finals they lost to Andy and JMDP, mind.

Murray/Del Potro were both the best player over the 2 weeks. No slam is more or less 'deserved', the same way all #1s deserved their ranking.

[tennishero]

Originally Posted by Tag

djokovic a ballbasher


del potro faced doublefaulterer in that 2009 final

he had the match handed to him by doublefaulterer's choking

emotionalabuserer cried and swore for roddick, but still lost the match

murray had to beat an in form berdych (who only shows up against olderer) in the semis, and beat both the wind and the best hard court player in the world in the final

murray's is more impressive, easily

doublefaulterer?? you are ridiculous.
the only double faults i remember are 2 consecutive ones from delpo to hand federer the third set at 5-6.


its no science, pushers have it much easier over shot makers in awkward/windy conditions. this summer, the stars truly aligned for mugray. as i said before, that olympic final was won in the semis.

[Topspindoctor]

Both are flukes, but as much as it pains me to say, Mandy. Del Shitro beat Nadal who couldn't serve and Noserer who choked in the most pathetic manner.

Mandy despite being helped by his weather manipulation magic, USTA and many other factors, actually beat exhausted No2e to grab his title. Plus previous achievements must be taken into account as well: Del Shitro can't even win a masters title, while Mandy has a few masters titles under his belt as well as several slam finals.

All in all, Mandy is more deserving slam champ IMO. Del Mugtro is a brainless ballbashing mug who fluked his slam like Johannson, while Mandy, despite lacking game tried his best time and time again until the stars aligned for him.

[BK 201]

Who did Murray beat before the finals? Lopez, a guy with one shot. Raonic? A guy with one shot, Cilic (choked but should have been up 2-0), Verdasco (a choker but was unlucky with some calls). Even in the final Djokovic wasn't great and the windy conditions made him play even worse. I'd take JMDP by a clear shot. I understand Nadal fans always like to play the injury card but it's not like Nadal is some hard court GOAT who can't lose when playing well and beating Federer is clearly more impressive than beating Djokovic at the US Open.

[Mark Lenders]

Originally Posted by Topspindoctor

Both are flukes, but as much as it pains me to say, Mandy. Del Shitro beat Nadal who couldn't serve and Noserer who choked in the most pathetic manner.

Mandy despite being helped by his weather manipulation magic, USTA and many other factors, actually beat exhausted No2e to grab his title. Plus previous achievements must be taken into account as well: Del Shitro can't even win a masters title, while Mandy has a few masters titles under his belt as well as several slam finals.

All in all, Mandy is more deserving slam champ IMO. Del Mugtro is a brainless ballbashing mug who fluked his slam like Johannson, while Mandy, despite lacking game tried his best time and time again until the stars aligned for him.

And didn't Del Potro actuall beat Nadal and Federer ? He didn't even ned any 'weather manipulation magic' or 'USTA' for it.

Originally Posted by BK 201

Who did Murray beat before the finals? Lopez, a guy with one shot. Raonic? A guy with one shot, Cilic (choked but should have been up 2-0), Verdasco (a choker but was unlucky with some calls). Even in the final Djokovic wasn't great and the windy conditions made him play even worse. I'd take JMDP by a clear shot. I understand Nadal fans always like to play the injury card but it's not like Nadal is some hard court GOAT who can't lose when playing well and beating Federer is clearly more impressive than beating Djokovic at the US Open.

Murray didn't face Verdasco in the US Open.