More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1? - Page 5 - MensTennisForums.com

MensTennisForums.com

MenstennisForums.com is the premier Men's Tennis forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!

View Poll Results: More important?

Slams 44 88.00%
Weeks at #1 6 12.00%
Voters: 50. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

Old 10-07-2012, 12:59 AM   #61
country flag Tag
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Age: 25
Posts: 3,087
Tag has a reputation beyond reputeTag has a reputation beyond reputeTag has a reputation beyond reputeTag has a reputation beyond reputeTag has a reputation beyond reputeTag has a reputation beyond reputeTag has a reputation beyond reputeTag has a reputation beyond reputeTag has a reputation beyond reputeTag has a reputation beyond reputeTag has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

chang also had several other slam finals, plus masters. only thing he didn't have was weeks at no 1, peaked at no 2

chang over rios, easily

anyway, the most important thing for a GOAT candidate is their wins over the muggiest players to ever mug it up at the top of the game
Tag is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 10-07-2012, 01:25 AM   #62
country flag Federer in 2
Registered User
 
Federer in 2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,185
Federer in 2 has a reputation beyond reputeFederer in 2 has a reputation beyond reputeFederer in 2 has a reputation beyond reputeFederer in 2 has a reputation beyond reputeFederer in 2 has a reputation beyond reputeFederer in 2 has a reputation beyond reputeFederer in 2 has a reputation beyond reputeFederer in 2 has a reputation beyond reputeFederer in 2 has a reputation beyond reputeFederer in 2 has a reputation beyond reputeFederer in 2 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

"Oh well what's the point of this poll?! MTF is full of Fedtards anyway so they are gonna vote for Slams cause Fed has the most. Oh wait..."
__________________
Tennis Tipping

Singles Ranking: #87
Singles Titles: Dallas CH 2013, Busan CH 2013, Este Fut 2013

Doubles Ranking: #112
Doubles Partner: ProdigyEng
Doubles Titles: Medellin CH 2012, Knoxville CH 2012, Antalya CH 2013, Brownsville CH 2013
Federer in 2 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 01:35 AM   #63
country flag uxyzapenje
Registered User
 
uxyzapenje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: At home.
Posts: 3,974
uxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Slams. But I voted for weeks at #1 bcs I don't think is THAT big of a difference as the poll shows it. I think the question would be like 1 Slam > 1 full year as #1 or 1 Slam < 1 full year as #1... Or if Ferrer or Delpo (or any non current top4 player) would (or was since now there's no chance for that to happen) somehow be ranked no1 at the end of this year, with Novak, Rafa, Roger and Andy winning 1 Slam each, who would be the best player of the year?
__________________
Djokovic | Tipsarevic | Querrey
uxyzapenje is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 03:00 AM   #64
country flag atennisfan
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,951
atennisfan has a reputation beyond reputeatennisfan has a reputation beyond reputeatennisfan has a reputation beyond reputeatennisfan has a reputation beyond reputeatennisfan has a reputation beyond reputeatennisfan has a reputation beyond reputeatennisfan has a reputation beyond reputeatennisfan has a reputation beyond reputeatennisfan has a reputation beyond reputeatennisfan has a reputation beyond reputeatennisfan has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slasher1985 View Post

Who would you say was better: Chang with 1 Slam or Rafter with 1 week as No.1 ? Answer this question and the OQ is also answered.
Rafter of course.
He has 2 slams and #1 ranking.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Topspindoctor View Post
People need to wake up. Olderer is not winning anymore slams - neither is he going to become #1.
atennisfan is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 03:06 AM   #65
country flag 156mphserve
Registered User
 
156mphserve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 12,200
156mphserve has a reputation beyond repute156mphserve has a reputation beyond repute156mphserve has a reputation beyond repute156mphserve has a reputation beyond repute156mphserve has a reputation beyond repute156mphserve has a reputation beyond repute156mphserve has a reputation beyond repute156mphserve has a reputation beyond repute156mphserve has a reputation beyond repute156mphserve has a reputation beyond repute156mphserve has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

The most important stat when refeing to GOAT is the most tard fans on MTF
__________________
2012 Chennai Champion
11-13 San Jose 3-Peat
Milos

Welcome Your Newest Top 10 Member

Raonic

Proud Canadian
11-13 San Jose 3-Peat
2012 Chennai Champion
156mphserve is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 05:35 AM   #66
country flag MaxPower
Registered User
 
MaxPower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Age: 29
Posts: 6,829
MaxPower has a reputation beyond reputeMaxPower has a reputation beyond reputeMaxPower has a reputation beyond reputeMaxPower has a reputation beyond reputeMaxPower has a reputation beyond reputeMaxPower has a reputation beyond reputeMaxPower has a reputation beyond reputeMaxPower has a reputation beyond reputeMaxPower has a reputation beyond reputeMaxPower has a reputation beyond reputeMaxPower has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

There aren't that many players in MEN's tennis that has been #1 without winning at least 1 slam.

Many more that has won slams or been in slam finals without ever being close to #1 aren't there?


#1 is actually a better "quality" guarantee. Harder to fluke #1 as the system works, than to fluke slams like the infamous one slam wonders who sometimes haven't even been in the top3 even


So I guess even in GOAT debate #1 should be seen as more difficult. Got a harder time seeing someone passing Federers weeks at nr1 than passing federers 17 slams.

slams you only need to be awesome for 4 tournaments a year. To hold #1 you need to be awesome all season. So in theory #1 has more prestige to it
MaxPower is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 06:49 AM   #67
country flag hipolymer
Registered User
 
hipolymer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Age: 34
Posts: 7,143
hipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond reputehipolymer has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Definitely slams.
__________________
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7F0JOdLZ9DE&feature=kp

Pay your respects to the vultures....
hipolymer is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 06:54 AM   #68
country flag Slasher1985
Rankings Master
 
Slasher1985's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Bucharest, Romania
Age: 28
Posts: 5,594
Slasher1985 has a reputation beyond reputeSlasher1985 has a reputation beyond reputeSlasher1985 has a reputation beyond reputeSlasher1985 has a reputation beyond reputeSlasher1985 has a reputation beyond reputeSlasher1985 has a reputation beyond reputeSlasher1985 has a reputation beyond reputeSlasher1985 has a reputation beyond reputeSlasher1985 has a reputation beyond reputeSlasher1985 has a reputation beyond reputeSlasher1985 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by atennisfan View Post
Rafter of course.
He has 2 slams and #1 ranking.
I changed that question in a later post.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slasher1985 View Post
EDIT: Yeah, you're right. Rafter has 2 GS. So, the way you said is the better questions.

Everyone: Chang vs. Rios. Which one was better ?
So, it's Chang vs Rios now
Slasher1985 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2012, 09:05 AM   #69
country flag Litotes
ALT-0
 
Litotes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Age: 41
Posts: 24,683
Litotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: More important for one's GOAT resume: Slams or Time Spent at #1?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MaxPower View Post
There aren't that many players in MEN's tennis that has been #1 without winning at least 1 slam.

Many more that has won slams or been in slam finals without ever being close to #1 aren't there?


#1 is actually a better "quality" guarantee. Harder to fluke #1 as the system works, than to fluke slams like the infamous one slam wonders who sometimes haven't even been in the top3 even


So I guess even in GOAT debate #1 should be seen as more difficult. Got a harder time seeing someone passing Federers weeks at nr1 than passing federers 17 slams.

slams you only need to be awesome for 4 tournaments a year. To hold #1 you need to be awesome all season. So in theory #1 has more prestige to it
The only #1 who didn't win a slam since the dawn of computer rankings in 1973 is Rios.

You think Federer's 299 and counting weeks are a better record than 17 slams? I don't. I think someone else will reach 299 weeks as #1 before someone else wins 17 slams (regardless of any later Fed improvements). After all, Sampras and Lendl are not that far back - ca. 4,5% for Sampras and 10% for Lendl. The difference %-wise to #2 an #3 in slam wins are much greater - 17,5% to Sampras and 35% to Borg/Laver/Nadal. Nadal is exceptional in having so many slams for so "few" weeks as #1 (Borg has similar numbers, but as we know he was cheated by the system and should have had more). I don't think the next double-digit slam winner will have been stuck at #2 for four years.
Litotes is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios