[sdtoot]

Originally Posted by Daniel_amr

Hi, is tehere a max qty of tournaments to be played during a season? I mean, similar to ATP rankings

You can play at one PAW tournament per week throughout the ATP Season but the PAW Rankings use your points scores from the following:-

Total points in the ranking is the sum of 4 Grand Slams, 8 best of ATP1000 (12 mandatory tournaments) and 6 best of the rest.

[Yoav]

Originally Posted by sdtoot

You can play at one PAW tournament per week throughout the ATP Season but the PAW Rankings use your points scores from the following:-

Total points in the ranking is the sum of 4 Grand Slams, 8 best of ATP1000 (12 mandatory tournaments) and 6 best of the rest.

3 questions please:
1. what are the 12 mandatory tournaments? i assume that the 1000 tournaments (total of 9) + which 3 more?
2. is the olympics a mandatory tournament?
3. is the rankings for the race to london are the same? (4 grand slams, 8 best of ATP1000 ect...)
thanks

[sdtoot]

Originally Posted by Yoav

3 questions please:
1. what are the 12 mandatory tournaments? i assume that the 1000 tournaments (total of 9) + which 3 more?
2. is the olympics a mandatory tournament?
3. is the rankings for the race to london are the same? (4 grand slams, 8 best of ATP1000 ect...)
thanks

1. 4 Grand Slams + 8 of 9 ATP1000's (Best 8 are used for Rankings)
2. No.
3. Yes, both Rankings use the same points structure (12 Mand + 6 best of the rest). However, if you qualify for the London ATP Masters at the end of the Season, then ranking points achieved at London will count as a 19th tournament in the Entry Rankings.

[Yoav]

Originally Posted by sdtoot

1. 4 Grand Slams + 8 of 9 ATP1000's (Best 8 are used for Rankings)
2. No.
3. Yes, both Rankings use the same points structure (12 Mand + 6 best of the rest). However, if you qualify for the London ATP Masters at the end of the Season, then ranking points achieved at London may count as one of your 'six best of the rest'.

if my 9th ATP1000 result is better than my 6th best of the rest result, it still won't count in the ranking?

[sdtoot]

Originally Posted by Yoav

if my 9th ATP1000 result is better than my 6th best of the rest result, it still won't count in the ranking?

It will count as one of your 6 best of the rest.

[Yoav]

Originally Posted by sdtoot

It will count as one of your 6 best of the rest.

thanks for the info

[supertom]

I have a question: I am currently playing for PAW in Chennai.
Rik. (manager) is leading with 1 point over me.
But it seems that we have the same picks for the next two matches and maybe for the next picks.
Imagining the situation remains the same until the final, what is the rule if the manager to which we can send the last pick is the competitor..

[Rik.]

Originally Posted by SUPERTOM93

I have a question: I am currently playing for PAW in Chennai.
Rik. (manager) is leading with 1 point over me.
But it seems that we have the same picks for the next two matches and maybe for the next picks.
Imagining the situation remains the same until the final, what is the rule if the manager to which we can send the last pick is the competitor..

In that case I will ask someone from the board to receive our final pick

[sdtoot]

Originally Posted by Rik.

In that case I will ask someone from the board to receive our final pick

You can both send your final picks to me if required.

[purtov45]

Originally Posted by sdtoot

1. 4 Grand Slams + 8 of 9 ATP1000's (Best 8 are used for Rankings)
2. No.
3. Yes, both Rankings use the same points structure (12 Mand + 6 best of the rest). However, if you qualify for the London ATP Masters at the end of the Season, then ranking points achieved at London may count as one of your 'six best of the rest'.

Hello Shaun,

Greg counted up ranking differently, for TOP-16 summarized 19 results, for the others 18. I shall reduce points for TOP-16?

[Rik.]

Originally Posted by purtov45

Hello Shaun,

Greg counted up ranking differently, for TOP-16 summarized 19 results, for the others 18. I shall reduce points for TOP-16?

I think that's because of the World tour finals which is only for the top 16, that's why they got 19 results and the other players have 18 results.

[sdtoot]

Originally Posted by purtov45

Hello Shaun,

Greg counted up ranking differently, for TOP-16 summarized 19 results, for the others 18. I shall reduce points for TOP-16?

Toivy,

Yes, Greg was correct. You count 18 tournaments plus the World Tour Final points for the top 16 players:-

4 Grand Slams + Best 8 of ATP100's + Best 6 of the rest + ATP World Tour Final points.

I have corrected my post #153 above to reflect this.

[jrm]

Question: if someone makes a mistake (wrong player in odd, picking one match twice with reverse winners) is it managers responsibility to contact player or not?

[robuś]

Responsibility? Of course not.

[supertom]

My view is that you have to notice it to the player on the thread.. After it is the player responsibility to adapt