Endless Federer-Nadal debates - Page 62 - MensTennisForums.com

MensTennisForums.com

MenstennisForums.com is the premier Men's Tennis forum on the internet. Registered Users do not see the above ads.Please Register - It's Free!

View Poll Results: How will it look?

Nadal more than 15 matches ahead. 103 39.31%
Nadal 13-14 matches ahead. 25 9.54%
Nadal 11-12 matches ahead. 19 7.25%
Nadal 9-10 matches ahead. 20 7.63%
Nadal 7-8 matches ahead. 20 7.63%
Nadal 5-6 matches ahead. 18 6.87%
Nadal 3-4 matches ahead. 5 1.91%
Nadal 1-2 matches ahead. 1 0.38%
Equal 4 1.53%
Federer ahead 47 17.94%
Voters: 262. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

Old 08-07-2012, 12:28 AM   #916
country flag Matt01
Registered User
 
Matt01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Germany
Posts: 7,411
Matt01 has a reputation beyond reputeMatt01 has a reputation beyond reputeMatt01 has a reputation beyond reputeMatt01 has a reputation beyond reputeMatt01 has a reputation beyond reputeMatt01 has a reputation beyond reputeMatt01 has a reputation beyond reputeMatt01 has a reputation beyond reputeMatt01 has a reputation beyond reputeMatt01 has a reputation beyond reputeMatt01 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Corey Feldman View Post
Exactly

when all is said and done, Nadal, Agassi and Serena may have a golden slam but their careers are still dwarfed by Fed's career, simple as.

Dwarfed? No, they aren't. A bit less arrogance would be nice.
__________________
Monaco - Del Potro - Wawrinka - Nadal - Robredo - Djokovic - Berdych - Chardy - Petzschner
Matt01 is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 

Old 08-07-2012, 01:10 AM   #917
country flag BigJohn
Banned!
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10,825
BigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt01 View Post
Dwarfed? No, they aren't. A bit less arrogance would be nice.
When it comes to slams wins, continued outstanding at performances at slams and weeks #1, they are... This is not arrogance, these are indisputable facts.
BigJohn is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 01:16 AM   #918
country flag n8
 
n8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canberra, Australia
Age: 29
Posts: 6,604
n8 has a reputation beyond reputen8 has a reputation beyond reputen8 has a reputation beyond reputen8 has a reputation beyond reputen8 has a reputation beyond reputen8 has a reputation beyond reputen8 has a reputation beyond reputen8 has a reputation beyond reputen8 has a reputation beyond reputen8 has a reputation beyond reputen8 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)

I don't get why there is a special name for a Golden Career Slam but nothing for a WTF Career Slam. I guess the latter doesn't have a nice ring to it.
n8 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 02:10 AM   #919
country flag bouncer7
Registered User
 
bouncer7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,167
bouncer7 has a reputation beyond reputebouncer7 has a reputation beyond reputebouncer7 has a reputation beyond reputebouncer7 has a reputation beyond reputebouncer7 has a reputation beyond reputebouncer7 has a reputation beyond reputebouncer7 has a reputation beyond reputebouncer7 has a reputation beyond reputebouncer7 has a reputation beyond reputebouncer7 has a reputation beyond reputebouncer7 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)

Quote:
Originally Posted by StatRacket View Post
I don't get why there is a special name for a Golden Career Slam but nothing for a WTF Career Slam. I guess the latter doesn't have a nice ring to it.
why are you just wasting energy on useless mtf tards cause this only could be dilemma on mtf lol
bouncer7 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 02:36 AM   #920
country flag Fumus
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 12,714
Fumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Olympics Final: Murray destroys Federer 6-2 6-1 6-4

Quote:
Originally Posted by luie View Post
Simply put , roddicks presence in this thread is as relevant as nadull , who u brought up .
This thread is about fed n Murray and the OG .

Is it? I see we are in the endless Federer-Nadal debates(WTF vs Olympics) thread. I win.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by leng jai View Post
Anyone who says any player has no chance against Dolgopolov is clearly trolling.
That's the gospel.
Fumus is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 02:57 AM   #921
country flag Julián Santiago
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,434
Julián Santiago has a reputation beyond reputeJulián Santiago has a reputation beyond reputeJulián Santiago has a reputation beyond reputeJulián Santiago has a reputation beyond reputeJulián Santiago has a reputation beyond reputeJulián Santiago has a reputation beyond reputeJulián Santiago has a reputation beyond reputeJulián Santiago has a reputation beyond reputeJulián Santiago has a reputation beyond reputeJulián Santiago has a reputation beyond reputeJulián Santiago has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt01 View Post
What? Davis Cup is not RR system.
He`s talking about the 2010 football World Cup...


Last edited by Julián Santiago : 08-07-2012 at 04:01 AM.
Julián Santiago is online now View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 03:26 AM   #922
country flag Fumus
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 12,714
Fumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond reputeFumus has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJohn View Post
It is impossible to fault Federer because Nadal could not keep up with him in reaching those finals, an argument not only retarded, it shows extremely bad faith from the one putting it forward. No wonder you support Nadal.

Who's faulting Federer!? I am not faulting him.

I am saying that his wins mean less without facing his rival. It's like taking a multiple choice English test without the written essay part that you suck at. Sure you got an "A" but someone omitted the biggest part of the test for you.

For certain there is a distinction between 250 and 1000 events. Yes you could argue that winning a 250 event is still winning a tournament and thus equal to winning any other non slam event. The difference between a 250, 500 and 1000 tournie is the competition, OH SNAP! That's why some posters here like to call top players vultures for winning such 250 mickey mouse events...

Roger can't beat Nadal in a slam...he won't. The wins he has since 2008 are tainted, he's a benefit of luck and circumstance. Nothing more.

Quote:
Originally Posted by StatRacket View Post
I don't get why there is a special name for a Golden Career Slam but nothing for a WTF Career Slam. I guess the latter doesn't have a nice ring to it.
I agree they are both BS for a tennis player. The idea of a career grand slam is stupid as Australia has changed it's surface several times now (as has the US open) and when Laver won them it was purely grass and clay. Deco didn't exist yet...let alone plexicushion.

Thus the idea of the career grand slam has changed; it's a fallacy. We can makeup whatever we want and the media can create hype around whatever they like...but really it remains...

1)Wimbledon
2)US Open and French Open
3)Aussie


If and when you win any of these you become tennis royalty. If you win more than one, you become a great...if you win more than anyone else you become a legend....you will never become the GOAT because someone else will pass you. Time will allow new champions always. All you can be is the greatest of all current time The GOACT.

(I'm counting on the fact that the world will not end in 2012 when I say all of this, if it does then Federer is by far the GOAT)

There is no grand slam, there are no bests ever...we love the best right now and who's number 1. The greats can be debated but as long as tennis continues to change with it's new surfaces, balls, racquets and string...not to mention the athletes becoming better, faster, taller and stronger...you really can't compare apples to oranges...it's like comparing foosball to fussball.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by leng jai View Post
Anyone who says any player has no chance against Dolgopolov is clearly trolling.
That's the gospel.
Fumus is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 03:41 AM   #923
country flag tripwires
Registered User
 
tripwires's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Amsterdam
Age: 28
Posts: 13,269
tripwires has a reputation beyond reputetripwires has a reputation beyond reputetripwires has a reputation beyond reputetripwires has a reputation beyond reputetripwires has a reputation beyond reputetripwires has a reputation beyond reputetripwires has a reputation beyond reputetripwires has a reputation beyond reputetripwires has a reputation beyond reputetripwires has a reputation beyond reputetripwires has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fumus View Post
Who's faulting Federer!? I am not faulting him.

I am saying that his wins mean less without facing his rival. It's like taking a multiple choice English test without the written essay part that you suck at. Sure you got an "A" but someone omitted the biggest part of the test for you.
That's the worst analogy of all-time. If I get an A on a pure MCQ without the essay part that I suck at, I still get an A. The only thing that the asterisk next to my grade would symbolise is that I totally kicked ass at the test (hence getting an A* - A Star).

Quote:
For certain there is a distinction between 250 and 1000 events. Yes you could argue that winning a 250 event is still winning a tournament and thus equal to winning any other non slam event. The difference between a 250, 500 and 1000 tournie is the competition, OH SNAP! That's why some posters here like to call top players vultures for winning such 250 mickey mouse events...
Again, your analogy is flawed. Nadal entered the 2012 Wimbledon Championships. He lost in the second round. That's not the same as a player winning a 250 tournament that the top players did not enter.

Quote:
Roger can't beat Nadal in a slam...he won't. The wins he has since 2008 are tainted, he's a benefit of luck and circumstance. Nothing more.
He did beat Nadal in a couple of slam finals, so stop trying to rewrite history. It's not his problem that Nadal couldn't get past the second round of Wimbledon this year, or that he lost to Ferrer in Melbourne 2010. Nadal losing before the final to meet Roger in no way taints his achievements. Only a Nadaltard/Fedhater would think that. Did he get lucky when Nadal lost early? Of course he did. But Nadal losing was not the only reason for Roger's victories. He had to show up, take the court, and, gasp, play tennis to win matches - and that was exactly what he did.

Anyway, you can discount his victories all you want; sadly for you, a win is a win, and there's nothing that anyone can say that'd diminish his success and achievements.
__________________
"But certain interests of particular people are so important that it would be wrong - morally wrong - for the community to sacrifice those interests just to secure an overall benefit. Political rights mark off and protect these particularly important interests. A political right, we may say, is a trump over the kind of trade-off argument that normally justifies political action." - Ronald Dworkin (RIP)
tripwires is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 03:54 AM   #924
country flag stewietennis
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,041
stewietennis has a reputation beyond reputestewietennis has a reputation beyond reputestewietennis has a reputation beyond reputestewietennis has a reputation beyond reputestewietennis has a reputation beyond reputestewietennis has a reputation beyond reputestewietennis has a reputation beyond reputestewietennis has a reputation beyond reputestewietennis has a reputation beyond reputestewietennis has a reputation beyond reputestewietennis has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fumus View Post
I am saying that his wins mean less without facing his rival. It's like taking a multiple choice English test without the written essay part that you suck at. Sure you got an "A" but someone omitted the biggest part of the test for you.
The point is to win tournaments, not to "beat that specific guy". Pete Sampras would only have five majors if we only count the ones with Agassi and the rest meaningless by your logic. Nadal would also only have six (vs rival Federer)
stewietennis is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 03:59 AM   #925
country flag BigJohn
Banned!
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 10,825
BigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond reputeBigJohn has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fumus View Post
Who's faulting Federer!? I am not faulting him.

I am saying that his wins mean less without facing his rival.
And that is a retarded statement because his rival was not good enough to reach the finals. I'm sure lots of connaisseurs are saying "this wimbledon title means less because thew winner did not beat the guy who lost in round 2 to an unknown ranked 100 in the world."

Actually connaisseurs is not the proper expression to describe people who would say that. I believe pathetic nadal fangirl fits better.
BigJohn is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 04:23 AM   #926
country flag evilmindbulgaria
Registered User
 
evilmindbulgaria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,899
evilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigJohn View Post
And that is a retarded statement because his rival was not good enough to reach the finals. I'm sure lots of connaisseurs are saying "this wimbledon title means less because thew winner did not beat the guy who lost in round 2 to an unknown ranked 100 in the world."

Actually connaisseurs is not the proper expression to describe people who would say that. I believe pathetic nadal fangirl fits better.
Oh, really? RG'06,07,08,11 AO'09 WI'08 were not all Nadal - Federer finals? How many more chances does the supposed "Goat" need?
__________________
RAFAEL NADAL and GRIGOR DIMITROV

Rafa winning at least one slam in 10 consecutive years is the best achievement in Open Era tennis since Laver won all 4 Grand slam tournaments in the same year!


Don't ever underestimate the heart of a champion!
evilmindbulgaria is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 04:39 AM   #927
country flag ssj100
Registered User
 
ssj100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 635
ssj100 has a reputation beyond reputessj100 has a reputation beyond reputessj100 has a reputation beyond reputessj100 has a reputation beyond reputessj100 has a reputation beyond reputessj100 has a reputation beyond reputessj100 has a reputation beyond reputessj100 has a reputation beyond reputessj100 has a reputation beyond reputessj100 has a reputation beyond reputessj100 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)

Quote:
Originally Posted by evilmindbulgaria View Post
Oh, really? RG'06,07,08,11 AO'09 WI'08 were not all Nadal - Federer finals? How many more chances does the supposed "Goat" need?
I think the point is that not many finals that Federer lost were played out in Federer's prime of 2003-2007. In fact, I count only 4 total finals between these two, with 2 Wimbledons to Federer and 2 French Opens to Nadal.

What would have been interesting is if Nadal was the same age as Federer.
__________________
warm regards...

6-2, 6-3, 6-2 and 6-2, 6-2, 6-2 and 6-3, 6-0 (and not even finals).
ssj100 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 04:55 AM   #928
country flag evilmindbulgaria
Registered User
 
evilmindbulgaria's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 3,899
evilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond reputeevilmindbulgaria has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)

Quote:
Originally Posted by ssj100 View Post
I think the point is that not many finals that Federer lost were played out in Federer's prime of 2003-2007. In fact, I count only 4 total finals between these two, with 2 Wimbledons to Federer and 2 French Opens to Nadal.

What would have been interesting is if Nadal was the same age as Federer.
That is one of the main reasons we cannot compare different eras. However, I disagree about Fed's prime. How about 2009? Did he not win 2 GS and reach the final at the other 2 GS? Looking only at one's "prime" years is silly IMO.
__________________
RAFAEL NADAL and GRIGOR DIMITROV

Rafa winning at least one slam in 10 consecutive years is the best achievement in Open Era tennis since Laver won all 4 Grand slam tournaments in the same year!


Don't ever underestimate the heart of a champion!
evilmindbulgaria is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 05:23 AM   #929
country flag rickcastle
Registered User
 
rickcastle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 934
rickcastle has a reputation beyond reputerickcastle has a reputation beyond reputerickcastle has a reputation beyond reputerickcastle has a reputation beyond reputerickcastle has a reputation beyond reputerickcastle has a reputation beyond reputerickcastle has a reputation beyond reputerickcastle has a reputation beyond reputerickcastle has a reputation beyond reputerickcastle has a reputation beyond reputerickcastle has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)

Well, maybe Olympics is more "prestigious" because of once every four years thing. But what does it say about Nadal that he is unable to win a less "prestigious" tournament (worth more points than everything else other than the slams btw) that is held EVERY year. And was actually able to make the finals only ONCE. There were a lot more chances for Nadal to win the WTF and yet he was unable to. I think that speaks more to everything above this "which is more prestigious" bullcrap.
rickcastle is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Old 08-07-2012, 05:31 AM   #930
country flag Litotes
ALT-0
 
Litotes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norway
Age: 41
Posts: 32,767
Litotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond reputeLitotes has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Endless Federer-Nadal debates (WTF vs Olympics)

For those who feel the Olympics are more prestigious because they are only held each four years - what is your take on Madrid on blue clay? That was - as it appears - once in a lifetime. So how big is that win, then?
Litotes is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


Copyright (C) Verticalscope Inc
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
vBCredits v1.4 Copyright ©2007, PixelFX Studios