[Looner]

Originally Posted by networthy

LOL at the fact that 159 people answered "no" to the poll

It was 45-55 before he won Wimbledon . Some even bandwagon on polls .

[bounccer]

Let's be honest, nobody bar the extreme fedtards thought it would be possible, i don't see any shame to have been wrong on this, i think it's the most impressive feat of Federer, very unreal.

[Litotes]

Originally Posted by bounccer

Let's be honest, nobody bar the extreme fedtards thought it would be possible,

Oh please. I always thought it was possible and I am no tard. And I am certainly not the only one.

[Looner]

Originally Posted by bounccer

Let's be honest, nobody bar the extreme fedtards thought it would be possible, i don't see any shame to have been wrong on this, i think it's the most impressive feat of Federer, very unreal.

Let's be honest, anyone who knows maths and has watched tennis before 2011 knew it'd be possible. Moreover, it's not about being wrong, it's about holding out until the end so you can vote and make yourself seem smart.

Again, it was 45-55 against. Look at it now. I have no problem with those that pointed out logically why it wouldn't happen as that's legit BUT others (like Nole spam) were so high on their horse that they were proclaiming Fed done and that he'd never win a slam. I don't care if she was serious or not, such posters need to be trolled so that next time they know not to spew so much bullshit.

[bounccer]

Originally Posted by Looner

Let's be honest, anyone who knows maths and has watched tennis before 2011 knew it'd be possible.

After the WTF, ok, but well, after the USO 2010/ USO 2011 it was very very unlikely.

[Looner]

Originally Posted by bounccer

After the WTF, ok, but well, after the USO 2010/ USO 2011 it was very very unlikely.

Yup, no argument there. I even held out voting until later, as I was unsure. It's about being ridiculous in your statements, not the fact you were wrong.

[bounccer]

It's really one oh his greatest achivements, Agassi was 1 older but there wasn't any big force in this time.

[luie]

Originally Posted by bounccer

It's really one oh his greatest achivements, Agassi was 1 older but there wasn't any big force in this time.

Agassi had Gil Reyes magic potion.

[JurajCrane]

I was sure Fed would have a decent shot at US Open, but taking it at Wimbledon was of course more impressive.

Now he should/can build on that and make a nice gap at Cincy/US Open which should protect him at inddor swing.

[bounccer]

Agassi was two years older but he became number one in 2003 with:

- AO, by playing one top 30, Grosjean, number 16 by that time, perhaps the easiest GS in the history.(Vahaly, Lee, Escudé, kid Coria, Grosjean, Ferreira, Shuettler)

- Two Masters Series, Miami (but he beat only El Ayanaoui, Costa and Moya, not a nightmare draw on hard) and Madrid ( Ferrero, Grosjean and Novak)

- Two smallers tournaments (Houston and San José)

He was the RU in the USO, he lost at the quarter in the French and at the 4th round in Wimbledon.


Good but not comparable to Federer IMO.

[atennisfan]

Originally Posted by samanosuke

Wondering where is setsampras right now after he lost last two living points

Setsampras reincarnated as Fireball.

[Looner]

I think Lenders has uncovered Fireballer as Saberq, which if true, would mean he'd disappear come Monday as his ban is up .

[atennisfan]

Originally Posted by Rafa = Fed Killa

This is disgusting and classless - what else can expect from a Fedtard

Disgusting and classless = A rafatard who went back and spit on his own words and never able to keep his own promise?

I thought you promised you'll leave us?
Please keep your word!

[Honestly]

Originally Posted by atennisfan

Setsampras reincarnated as Fireball.

Is Fireballer really Setsampy?

[Honestly]

Originally Posted by abraxas21

federer owning navratilova

"Roger is on the other side of the float, I don't think he'll ever play as well as he did three or four years ago—that's not to say he can't still win a slam, but it's difficult to see him climbing back to No. 1," Navratilova said. "Nadal is dominating and Djokovic's confidence is off the chart. Roger has lost three matches (this season) to Djokovic and lost to him at U.S. Open last year as well, it will get under his skin."

federer's reply:
"You'd rather hear other things, you know. Maybe she missed the London World Tour Finals. I don't know. Maybe she was somewhere else climbing Kilimanjaro. I don't know. I love her."

It doesn't matter how far you got in the women's game. As long as you are a woman it's better to shut your mouth about men's tennis. Unless you wana look like a complete idiot like Navratilova here.