 |
02-22-2012, 04:15 AM
|
#1
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 3,209
|
Harrison def Sock 6-3 2-6 6-4
Didn't see the match but I have a feeling it was some piece of crap.
No good Ryan, so no good.
__________________
THERE IS NO SIGNATURE HERE.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
02-22-2012, 04:18 AM
|
#2
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 621
|
Re: Harrison def Sock 6-3 2-6 6-4
Pure embarrassment.
|
|
|
02-22-2012, 04:36 AM
|
#3
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 10,382
|
Re: Harrison def Sock 6-3 2-6 6-4
Quote:
Originally Posted by benji47
Pure embarrassment.
|

|
|
|
02-22-2012, 05:40 AM
|
#4
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Age: 24
Posts: 12,044
|
Re: Harrison def Sock 6-3 2-6 6-4
Quote:
Originally Posted by benji47
Pure embarrassment.
|
It's better than losing to Dodig or Young or being bageled by Sweeting 
|
|
|
02-22-2012, 06:01 AM
|
#5
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Sheep and hobbit land.
Age: 22
Posts: 8,720
|
Re: Harrison def Sock 6-3 2-6 6-4
Give more respect to Sock, he's a slam champ  .
Well done Ryan   .
__________________
No order.Berdych Soderling Giraldo Dimitrov Wawrinka del Potro Simon Gulbis Blake Djokovic
Verdasco
|
|
|
02-22-2012, 06:26 AM
|
#6
|
|
Banned!
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 5,509
|
Re: Harrison def Sock 6-3 2-6 6-4
Quote:
Originally Posted by benji47
Pure embarrassment.
|
There was no stream for this match so how can you call it embarrassment?
I mean I've always been pessimistic but this is pointless. At least he won.
|
|
|
02-22-2012, 06:32 AM
|
#7
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 621
|
Re: Harrison def Sock 6-3 2-6 6-4
There, you said it yourself. What a hypocrite, if I never had a problem with you being "pessimistic" then maybe you should sit down and get a grip. You know you've said worse, so just stop. LOW.
|
|
|
02-22-2012, 08:10 AM
|
#8
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 894
|
Re: Harrison def Sock 6-3 2-6 6-4
He won a match in an ATP 500, the next opponent is beatable, and even with this R2 alone he is likely to reach a new career high ranking. I don't really see the downside.
|
|
|
02-22-2012, 08:31 AM
|
#9
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2010
Age: 24
Posts: 14,152
|
Re: Harrison def Sock 6-3 2-6 6-4
socky  nice fight
|
|
|
02-22-2012, 02:10 PM
|
#10
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Albany, NY
Posts: 12,380
|
Re: Harrison def Sock 6-3 2-6 6-4
I think it's title week for Harrison.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by NID
tsonga rules.
|
Doesn't he though?
|
|
|
02-22-2012, 02:22 PM
|
#11
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Age: 24
Posts: 12,044
|
Re: Harrison def Sock 6-3 2-6 6-4
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fumus
I think it's title week for Harrison.
|
Not if he folds in another tie break against a serve bot.
|
|
|
02-22-2012, 05:14 PM
|
#12
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,535
|
Re: Harrison def Sock 6-3 2-6 6-4
Quote:
Originally Posted by LawrenceOfTennis
There was no stream for this match so how can you call it embarrassment?
I mean I've always been pessimistic but this is pointless. At least he won.
|
Don't underestimate the patheticness of young haters. No stream of the match, with no clue how either played, and yet there are still a couple of posters saying "embarrassment" and basically saying that the match sucked. If Harrison would have won 0 and 2, then these same people would have just said that Sock sucked and Harrison was supposed to win like that, and if Sock won these people would have just said the opposite. Basically, there is no scoreline that would have kept the haters from hating.
How anyone can just look at a scoreline and hate out of ignorance is beyond me, but then again MTF has long since become the ultimate troll site.
__________________
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Frank Garrett
This is about the 4th post you've made today.
|
|
|
|
02-22-2012, 08:39 PM
|
#13
|
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 6,771
|
Re: Harrison def Sock 6-3 2-6 6-4
The last time they played, it went to four sets:
7-6 (7-3), 6-2, 6-7 (4-7), 6-4 (2010 USTA Australian WC Playoff).
Even if Jack did not play well, like Ryan, his serve will keep him in the match most of the time.
Last edited by SapELee : 02-22-2012 at 08:47 PM.
|
|
|
 |
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|