[Persimmon]

Problem is entirely mental.

[lazybear]

Voted more than 5, i think he is (was) more talented than Agassi. Now, even if i'm right (what is talent?) i don't think it means he deserves\deserved even one, just because he is so talented. Less gifted players could put it together for 2 weeks, mentally, phisically, he couldn't, not even once, though he was close a couple of times. He still have a puncher's chance to win one.

[Serenidad]

None now. Brands is in the draw.

[kooties]

honestly it's an insult to the people who've actually worked their asses off and got those slams.

[2003]

Originally Posted by borracho

If he would have won 1 or 2 already it is a different story, but since he has won none there is no need to assume he would have won some to begin with.

I disagree.

Look at how Fed got his feet wet. 2003 Wimbledon.

Dave had a 5 setter going into the final with Peak Lleyton Hewitt.

Fed got Phil A Poosis in his first final.

How could history have turned for Dave had he won that 2002 Wimbledon and then the 2003 US Open which he was ROBBED of.

When you look at it that way Dave could have had a stellar career, at least on par with Hewitt.

Instead hes got to settle for what history gave him.

Some people got it easier than others.

[nalbyfan]

Originally Posted by Persimmon

Problem is entirely mental.

His problem is not mental if not he wouldn't have won Master and wouldn't be a king in DC, a very tought competition which needs a strong mind to play in front of a noisy unamical foreign crowd sometimes