 |
|
12-09-2011, 02:00 AM
|
#151
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2007
Age: 23
Posts: 1,581
|
Re: US presidential election 2012
that wont be enough as jimmik said above, war is a big spending but not as much to drastically change their economy a bit in case of stoping it. even though i agree it would be a good start.
|
|
|
|
Sponsored Links
|
Advertisement
|
|
12-09-2011, 02:42 AM
|
#152
|
|
RAVE ON
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 12,653
|
Re: US presidential election 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by shiaben
Though it seems though buddyholly that you're okay with that since judging from your flag I'm sure you paint a beautiful and glorious picture of imperialists and colonialists since they've helped the likes of you separate Northern Ireland from the mainland.
|
What does that even mean?
__________________
JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY
|
|
|
12-09-2011, 02:43 AM
|
#153
|
|
RAVE ON
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 12,653
|
Re: US presidential election 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by shiaben
Corruption exists everywhere but what's ridiculous is the continuation of imperialism in today's world.
|
Ar you talking about China and Venezuela now?
__________________
JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY
|
|
|
12-09-2011, 03:00 AM
|
#154
|
|
RAVE ON
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: LUBBOCK TX
Posts: 12,653
|
Re: US presidential election 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by abraxas21
where have i accepted anything from grassquet or other user here?
read what i said again: i don't have the will to read every stupid post those 2 have made in this thread . i referred to your posts in general, not your obama-related posts as you assert.
and then you've got the guts to say i'm making a fool of myself 
|
When you use a Grassquet post to lead into what you want to say, that tells me you are accepting Grassquet's lead.
But forget about it - anyone who can state an opinion on my posts and at the very same time claim not to read them, obviously is not to be taken seriously.
__________________
JOIN THE CHURCH OF THE FLYING SPAGHETTI MONSTER TODAY
|
|
|
12-09-2011, 05:14 AM
|
#155
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 5,972
|
Re: US presidential election 2012
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1211/70156.html
Quote:
|
Ron Paul takes foreign policy message to Iowa
|
boy, would the world be interesting (in all kinds of ways) with paul running washington...just imagine the power struggle in the middle east once america withdraws completely. he's certainly onto something politically but some of his views, if implemented, seem just downright scary.
|
|
|
12-09-2011, 05:57 AM
|
#156
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 19,348
|
Re: US presidential election 2012
Ron Paul is the only republican I'd vote for. Otherwise I vote libertarian, even if it's a "wasted vote". Republicans and democrats don't make much difference to me.
|
|
|
12-09-2011, 07:39 PM
|
#157
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,334
|
Re: US presidential election 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by buddyholly
Ar you talking about China and Venezuela now?
|
Care to elaborate how either of these countries are imperialists? (Especially the latter).
|
|
|
12-09-2011, 07:43 PM
|
#158
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 4,334
|
Re: US presidential election 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimnik
Ron Paul is the only republican I'd vote for. Otherwise I vote libertarian, even if it's a "wasted vote". Republicans and democrats don't make much difference to me.
|
That's kind of how I feel about the situation as well.
Regardless, of all the available candidates including Obama whose defending the Democratic race, without a shout of a doubt, I think Ron Paul would be ideal if he does all the things he says.
Then again even with his amazing ads and messages he's got out to really strengthen his position, the poor guy will not receive the required amount of votes he deserves to lead the country.
|
|
|
12-09-2011, 08:04 PM
|
#159
|
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Age: 27
Posts: 20,224
|
Re: US presidential election 2012
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by philosophicalarf
Armstrong says in-competition testing will never catch anyone, only out-of-competition testing and the blood passport can.
Tennis has no blood passport system, and does basically no out of competition testing.
The methods and drugs used by Armstrong in 1999 would work in tennis right now, with zero chance of being caught (not slightly surprising to anyone familiar with the topic, btw).
|
|
|
|
12-09-2011, 08:57 PM
|
#160
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 19,348
|
Re: US presidential election 2012
Good for him.
I believe in evolution but I can't stand arrogant scientific atheists. I bet he wound them right up.
Btw, that video didn't work for me.
|
|
|
12-09-2011, 10:05 PM
|
#162
|
|
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Germany
Age: 27
Posts: 20,224
|
Re: US presidential election 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimnik
Good for him.
I believe in evolution but I can't stand arrogant scientific atheists. I bet he wound them right up.
Btw, that video didn't work for me.
|
Nevermind about the "arrogant scientific atheists". And you don't "believe" in evolution, just like you don't "believe" that Pluto exists.
You simply cannot pretend someone who ignores an established scientific theory is qualified to become the most powerful person in the world.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by philosophicalarf
Armstrong says in-competition testing will never catch anyone, only out-of-competition testing and the blood passport can.
Tennis has no blood passport system, and does basically no out of competition testing.
The methods and drugs used by Armstrong in 1999 would work in tennis right now, with zero chance of being caught (not slightly surprising to anyone familiar with the topic, btw).
|
|
|
|
12-09-2011, 10:44 PM
|
#163
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Here
Posts: 19,348
|
Re: US presidential election 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Har-Tru
Nevermind about the "arrogant scientific atheists". And you don't "believe" in evolution, just like you don't "believe" that Pluto exists.
You simply cannot pretend someone who ignores an established scientific theory is qualified to become the most powerful person in the world.
|
Actually, since he's trying to be president, I'm more concerned whether he believes in proven economic theories than evolution, gravity or Einstein's theory of relativity.
If he was applying to be a nuclear physicist, then I'd be worried.
|
|
|
12-10-2011, 12:27 AM
|
#164
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2009
Age: 27
Posts: 11,597
|
Re: US presidential election 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimnik
Actually, since he's trying to be president, I'm more concerned whether he believes in proven economic theories than evolution, gravity or Einstein's theory of relativity.
If he was applying to be a nuclear physicist, then I'd be worried.
|
proven economic theories
i'd really like to see you elaborting on that
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saberq
Nole will lose this I can see it.........disgusting mug,choker,loser I am ashamed to be half Serb
|
|
|
|
12-10-2011, 12:35 AM
|
#165
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Sen'jin Village
Age: 28
Posts: 16,788
|
Re: US presidential election 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Har-Tru
|
yet another yank bible humper. nothing to see here. I bet they'll still have presidents who believe in a magical wizard who created everything in thousand years' time.  
__________________
20-10
Honestly banned  Thanks mods, for taking out the trash
|
|
|
 |
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|