[kyleskywalker007]

Originally Posted by syc23

Nadal's is better - think about it... everyone wrote him off after getting destroyed at WTF '09 and beaten by Murray at this year's AO. No one thought he had chance chance in hell in winning a slam again never mind completing the GS set. But won against all odds to claim his first USO to complete win all 4 slams at 24 years of age. He may not have won this year's WTF to finish the year on a high but there was more pressure for Rafa to deliver whereas Roger was expected to win everything back in '07.

Don't you think that if people expected Roger to win back in ´07 that was also called pressure? A lot of it.

[syc23]

Originally Posted by kyleskywalker007

Don't you think that if people expected Roger to win back in ´07 that was also called pressure? A lot of it.

Yes but he didn't have to contend with a Nadal back then who had only dominated at RG. The only pressure he had was to win RG which he failed...miserably. He only won it 2 years later because Nadal was beaten on an off day by an inspired Soderling and epic chokes by Haas and Del Potro.

[Corey Feldman]

2007 Dubai is well known as the start of Fed's decline

he was never same invincible player after that tournie

[rocketassist]

Originally Posted by syc23

Nadal's is better - think about it... everyone wrote him off after getting destroyed at WTF '09 and beaten by Murray at this year's AO. No one thought he had chance chance in hell in winning a slam again never mind completing the GS set. But won against all odds to claim his first USO to complete win all 4 slams at 24 years of age. He may not have won this year's WTF to finish the year on a high but there was more pressure for Rafa to deliver whereas Roger was expected to win everything back in '07.

Contradictory- if Roger's expected to win everything, then that's pressure, no?

Nadal has won his 3 slams in a shit year quality-wise. He was always winning RG, whilst Wimbledon and the USO were jokes and full of clownish players.

Fed walks it.

[2003]

Originally Posted by Swiss Mountain

LOL at the idiot who create the topic: Fed's 2007 season is far more superior to Nadal's 2010, but fed's 2004 and 2006 season are far superior to Nadal's 2010!

Why did he choose Federer 2007? scare of the 2004,2005 & 2006 comparision?

The reason is simple.

If I can open a thread and unanamously destroy Nadals best season, with Federers 3rd or 4th best season, imagine what I can do to the tards when I open up the 2006 and 2004 threads

[barbadosan]

Originally Posted by syc23

Yes but he didn't have to contend with a Nadal back then who had only dominated at RG. The only pressure he had was to win RG which he failed...miserably. He only won it 2 years later because Nadal was beaten on an off day by an inspired Soderling and epic chokes by Haas and Del Potro.

So you were the one I heard praying for Haas and Del Potro to beat Fed...

[Jaz]

Originally Posted by syc23

Yes but he didn't have to contend with a Nadal back then who had only dominated at RG. The only pressure he had was to win RG which he failed...miserably. He only won it 2 years later because Nadal was beaten on an off day by an inspired Soderling and epic chokes by Haas and Del Potro.

Haas and Del Po didn't choke.

FFS, Del Po had perhaps one of the best games of his season (Well bar the Uso final). Federer really went super-risky and aggressive to win those matches. I remember some crazy forehands.

You are everything that's wrong with Tennis. Federer's RG win was well-deserved he had to show SPARTAN like qualities and he did, and Soderling played well all tournament.

[RedHotRafa]

Fed

[Mountaindewslave]

Haha you guys are crazy, certainly Nadal's 2010 is more impressive than Federer's 2007? It is much harder to win Roland Garros, Wimbledon, US OPEN, in a row than AUSTRALIA, _______, WIMBLEDON, US OPEN..... there is a reason why Federer has never won Roland Garros, WIMB, US OPEN all in a row, the changing of 3 surfaces is tough! You people are seriously taking for granted the difficulty of winning the 3 different GS surfaces in a row- i seriously doubt that Roger Federer himself would say that his 2007 season was better than Rafael's 2010- they both had generally successful seasons, similar level, in the diff years, but what puts Rafa's ahead is the fact that Roland Garros was part of his 3 in a row unlike FEDDD

[Chirag]

Originally Posted by syc23

Yes but he didn't have to contend with a Nadal back then who had only dominated at RG. The only pressure he had was to win RG which he failed...miserably. He only won it 2 years later because Nadal was beaten on an off day by an inspired Soderling and epic chokes by Haas and Del Potro.

1 Correction Those Haas wouldnt choked in that match if it hadnt been for federers choking,so yup if fed hadnt choked in that match haas wouldnt even have had a chance to choke right..So bottom line is fed controlled that match.With del po you call a choke,thats a funny one as it never was a choke..

[a_boy]

The statistics say Federer, and being little more than a statistic myself, I say Federer also.

[LinkMage]

Originally Posted by Corey Feldman

2007 Dubai is well known as the start of Fed's decline

he was never same invincible player after that tournie

Yup, it was Sampras's fault after that meeting before Indian Wells 2007.

He then lost twice to that Argie doper.

[2003]

Federer was a couple of points away from winning 3 slams in a row in 2009, and had he, it still wouldn't have been better than his 2007.

For fuck sakes, I dont even remember much talk about the 3 slams in a row at that time. Cause it was Federer no one really gave a shit.

But because its Nadal it's such a huge deal.

[luie]

Originally Posted by syc23

Yes but he didn't have to contend with a Nadal back then who had only dominated at RG. The only pressure he had was to win RG which he failed...miserably. He only won it 2 years later because Nadal was beaten on an off day by an inspired Soderling and epic chokes by Haas and Del Potro.

Back then nadull was a pure[B] moonballer [/b]not sure what he could have done outside RG but then you never know.
As for the question 2007 was better REAL competition. Not bend over berdych & a bunch of old tired players.

[2003]

Originally Posted by luie

Back then nadull was a pure[B] moonballer [/b]not sure what he could have done outside RG but then you never know.
As for the question 2007 was better REAL competition. Not bend over berdych & a bunch of old tired players.

Ben dover Bird Bitch