[~Maya~]

Originally Posted by Vida

what a garbage post.

if you are going to slate posters, do it right. or better dont do it at all since you havent been here at the time.

beside that, there is more than enough reasons for this thread to stand, since after federer and nadal, djokovic is the player with biggest chances to win slams in the future. looking at numbers there is no argument against that claim.

Sure he was. It's KitinovRules

[Vida]

Originally Posted by ~Maya~

Sure he was. It's KitinovRules

if so, thats a shame. that guy was the biggest pussy on the board

[FormerRafaFan]

I don't think Djoker is good enough to win on grass or clay, so Wimbly and FO are out. His best chances are AO and USO. I still have my doubts though, one bad draw with Rafa, Fed or Murray and he could lose.

[Topspindoctor]

Originally Posted by sokk

I don't think Djoker is good enough to win on grass or clay, so Wimbly and FO are out. His best chances are AO and USO. I still have my doubts though, one bad draw with Rafa, Fed or Murray and he could lose.

He's good enough on clay. Madrid 2009 SF was flawless clay tennis by him, which could easily win him RG, if he can improve his fitness.

[fast_clay]

Thread Status: GOAT Thread

[FormerRafaFan]

Originally Posted by Topspindoctor

He's good enough on clay. Madrid 2009 SF was flawless clay tennis by him, which could easily win him RG, if he can improve his fitness.

Hmm, perhaps.. I'm kinda worried about his health though. I know he's learned to live with his allergies and breathing issues, and he has fought through every match even when he felt bad. But I can't help but to feel it will destroy him one day, especially in Australian Open. He doesn't deal well with the heat, and tt gets REALLY hot down there in summer (January).

[B787]

Originally Posted by ~Maya~

Sure he was. It's KitinovRules

I feel sorry for you. You are spending here too much time .

And for you Vida, warm regards from Tallin 1:3

[Vida]

Originally Posted by B787

I feel sorry for you. You are spending here too much time .

And for you Vida, warm regards from Tallin 1:3

thats just ridiculous. whats that got to do with anything?

anyway, I totally expected that kind of result, so whatever your point is, it missed.

[BigJohn]

Originally Posted by Vida

what a garbage post.

if you are going to slate posters, do it right. or better dont do it at all since you havent been here at the time.

beside that, there is more than enough reasons for this thread to stand, since after federer and nadal, djokovic is the player with biggest chances to win slams in the future. looking at numbers there is no argument against that claim.

There are just as many arguments to support that claim as there are to oppose it.

[«Ivan»]

Originally Posted by B787

I feel sorry for you. You are spending here too much time .

And for you Vida, warm regards from Tallin 1:3

kitinov,pa sto si pizdunica?
as far as i recall tallin is estonian capital but also cerga near veles.nice cerga though.

[Matt01]

Originally Posted by rocketassist

Of course, those two are obviously less varied compared to Fed/Nalby/Safin. Then again you've made it clear you hate grasscourts and therefore volleying/net tennis.

You couldn't be more wrong. The classical S&V-game à la Edberg and Narvatilova is my favorite style of play

[Nole fan]

Originally Posted by Vida

what a garbage post.

if you are going to slate posters, do it right. or better dont do it at all since you havent been here at the time.

beside that, there is more than enough reasons for this thread to stand, since after federer and nadal, djokovic is the player with biggest chances to win slams in the future. looking at numbers there is no argument against that claim.

+1
The truth is you Federer fans are afraid of Novak and rightly so.

[Mjau!]

He has no chance in Europe and the AO is too hot to handle. With only one realistic shot at a slam, the odds will be high.

[abraxas21]

this topspindoctor is gooooooood

[eclecticist]

funny too how a nadal fan predicted it