[Andre'sNo1Fan]

Originally Posted by .-Federers_Mate-.

wow another incredibly silly comment. Idk maybe cos Roger beaten Rafa on everysurface?....geez Rafa beats Roger twice in 5 sets in Feds decline and suddenly Roger isnt a threat. LOL hes won 16 slams ffs. Obviously Nadal wasnt a big enough threat to get in the way of that. Not even going to comment on the 2nd comment did you watch the US Open final? (nole was pathetic). Its sad to see Rafatartds show such disrespect to the game and its greatest player. Roger has won 16 slams, get over it already. In March Nadal was losing to Roddick and Ljubo ffs, the only diff from then, is that everyone is injured/off form. Its not going to last for long

Lol. Do you watch matches between Nadal and Federer. I'm not interested in how many slams Federer has won what's that got to do with anything. Fact is that Nole is a bigger threat to Rafa than Roger is. Period.

[Dextertje]

Originally Posted by Andre'sNo1Fan

He would rather face Federer clearly.

Clearly, any sane player would rather face arguably the best hardcourt player ever over a one time slam winner, makes so much sense... :retard:

[Topspindoctor]

Originally Posted by P. Antonius

Rafatards having high hopes on Djokovic to take out Fed at every harcourt slam from now on so deluded

Djokovic is much much worse opponent for Nadal, both on hard courts and on clay.

[Dextertje]

Originally Posted by Topspindoctor

Djokovic is much much worse opponent for Nadal, both on hard courts and on clay.

Probably on grass too :retard:

[Amber Spyglass]

Tard wars at their best

[Time Violation]

Someone should rename the topic

[Topspindoctor]

Originally Posted by P. Antonius

Probably on grass too :retard:

Stop kidding yourself, Nadal would thrash Federer on hard court in 3 straightforward sets. He was lucky he lost in SF, avoided another humiliation and denied Nadal US Open win without dropping a set, because Nole played so well.

[Andre'sNo1Fan]

Originally Posted by P. Antonius

Clearly, any sane player would rather face arguably the best hardcourt player ever over a one time slam winner, makes so much sense... :retard:

As I said before do you even watch tennis? Nadal is a bad match up for Federer that's simple. Do you understand that or do you have your "Roger has 16 slams so must be best at everything" glasses on. Fact is Djokovic is a harder match up for Nadal and I'd rather Rafa played Roger anyway.

[Dextertje]

Originally Posted by Topspindoctor

Stop kidding yourself, Nadal would thrash Federer on hard court in 3 straightforward sets. He was lucky he lost in SF, avoided another humiliation and denied Nadal US Open win without dropping a set, because Nole played so well.

Nadal straight setted and humiliated Fed on hardcourt so often, how can I be so dumb indeed

For some reason I don't seem to remember the times Rafa routinely spanked Roger at AO/USO from 2004 to 2008...

[Topspindoctor]

Originally Posted by P. Antonius

Nadal straight setted and humiliated Fed on hardcourt so often, how can I be so dumb indeed

For some reason I don't seem to remember the times Rafa routinely spanked Roger at AO/USO from 2004 to 2008...

Because Federer is the same player he was even one year ago? :retard:

He's significantly worse, slower, not as clutch, worse BH, FH, you name it. Nadal has got better with serve and forehand on HCs, so it's no contest now.

[.-Federers_Mate-.]

Originally Posted by Andre'sNo1Fan

Lol. Do you watch matches between Nadal and Federer. I'm not interested in how many slams Federer has won what's that got to do with anything. Fact is that Nole is a bigger threat to Rafa than Roger is. Period.

Of Course i do. It has everything do with anything. It shows that Roger has done it before and do it again. Whats Nole done to deserve this great priase. A threat on clay?..last time i checked he was losing to the likes of Kohli and Melzer at RG. Threat my ass

[.-Federers_Mate-.]

Originally Posted by Topspindoctor

Because Federer is the same player he was even one year ago? :retard:

He's significantly worse, slower, not as clutch, worse BH, FH, you name it. Nadal has got better with serve and forehand on HCs, so it's no contest now.

he is still better than Novak Djokovic. The guy hasnt beaten anyone decent all year until the US Open. Hes been losing to krajinovic, Rochus etc and after one tourny hes the new Nadaltard hero?.

Up until Newyork, the best win For Novak was Hewitt at wimby. I like Hewitt but come on...

[Andre'sNo1Fan]

Originally Posted by P. Antonius

Nadal straight setted and humiliated Fed on hardcourt so often, how can I be so dumb indeed

For some reason I don't seem to remember the times Rafa routinely spanked Roger at AO/USO from 2004 to 2008...

That has absolutely nothing to do with the fact that Federer struggles big time with Nadal. Nadal has beaten Federer 14 times in compared to 7. That's ownage. Djokovic does not have the same issues right now. Tennis is not all about slams which is all that your crap argument seems to be about.

[Dextertje]

Originally Posted by Topspindoctor

Because Federer is the same player he was even one year ago? :retard:

He's significantly worse, slower, not as clutch, worse BH, FH, you name it. Nadal has got better with serve and forehand on HCs, so it's no contest now.

Last year at the same period everyone was writing Nadal off because he was in another slump and at the same period this year he's greater than god... Everything changes fast in sport, be careful by writing Fed off already

[Topspindoctor]

Originally Posted by P. Antonius

Last year at the same period everyone was writing Nadal off because he was in another slump and at the same period this year he's greater than god... Everything changes fast in sport, be careful by writing Fed off already

Small difference

Nadal was having his slump at 23

Federer is 29

Meaning, this is probably not a slump, but natural result of aging.