MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - More details about points distribution from 2009

View Single Post

Old 10-30-2008, 06:29 AM   #32
country flag ~Maya~
-LIFETIME MEMBER-
 
~Maya~'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 4,493
~Maya~ has a reputation beyond repute~Maya~ has a reputation beyond repute~Maya~ has a reputation beyond repute~Maya~ has a reputation beyond repute~Maya~ has a reputation beyond repute~Maya~ has a reputation beyond repute~Maya~ has a reputation beyond repute~Maya~ has a reputation beyond repute~Maya~ has a reputation beyond repute~Maya~ has a reputation beyond repute~Maya~ has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: More details about points distribution from 2009

Quote:
GRAND SLAM (Masters 1000s are exactly the same, but divided by two)
Increase: (100%) (71%) (60%) (44 %) (33%)
2009: W (2000) F (1200) SF (720) QF (360) 16 (200)
2008: W (1000) F (700) SF (450) QF (250) 16 (150)


ATP 500

Increase: (66%) (42%) (33%) (20%) (80%)
2009 W (500) F (300) SF (180) QF (90) 16 (45)
2008 W (300) F (210) SF (135) QF (75) 16 (25)

$125,000 CHALLENGER

Increase: (25%) ( 7%) (-3%) (-5%) (-33%)
2009 W (100) F (60) SF (35) QF (18) 16 (6)
2008 W (80) F (56) SF (36) QF (19) 16 (8)

$50,000 CHALLENGER

Increase: (50%) (28 %) (22 %) (25%) (0%)
2009 W (75) F (45) SF (27) QF (15) 16 (5)
2008 W (50) F (35) SF (22) QF (12) 16 (5)

$15,000 FUTURES
Increase: (28%) (16%) (16%) (0%) (0%)
2009 W (25) F (14) SF (7) QF (3) 16 (1)
2008 W (18) F (12) SF (6) QF (3) 16 (1)
This does not follow any logic. Just compare increase in points between two challenger events. Did they have some kind of vote or just one person had a power to come up with this? This is plain ridiculous.
~Maya~ is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote