I didn't want retire the credit of Peralta's win! He's a good victory, but you can say that it was a victory at GA level, maybe neither a G1 level.
In next 2 week, we will see 2 Australian G1 tournaments with a entry list 3/4x better than Casablanca.
I'm not question only Casablanca status, I made it in Osaka Mayors too. I think that it's bad for junior circuit, because rankings don't show the real talent of players.
And why a Grand Slam give exactly some points that a GA, exception to the winner (2x)? So, a GS finalist is so hard that a GA, but a GS winner is 2x much hard tha a GA winner... What is a logic of this?