Originally Posted by Singularity
Imagine he was only good against the top 4, but everyone else could beat him with ease. By your reasoning he would still be fifth in the world even though everyone below him could beat him.
This is an impossible scenario: first of all he'd not even get to face the top 4 if everyone else beat him easily. Besides, if a certain game was effective against the top 4 but easy pickings for the rest of the field, we'd have like the weakest top 4 in history, no?