Originally Posted by Time Violation
If everything suits everyone why Murray doesn't have a single finals on clay, let alone a title? Why Nadal hasn't won a title outside clay in a long time?
I didn't say that there is no difference. I said there is minimal difference. It might give one of the top players an edge over the others but it doesn't stop them being contenders.
Nadal might struggle to win off clay but he is still usually a lock for the SFs of Wimbledon. 10 years ago you had Guga ranked #1 and losing in the first round of Wimbledon after winning RG. THAT'S different surfaces.