Originally Posted by dencod16
Lol at this... What is relevance of slams won 4 years ago... to say that Federer is above Djokovic in clay is stupid, and to place Murray 4th at grass is even more stupid... Please live in the present, yes they have achieve a lot, but those are irrelevant, the proper basis is at most 2 years ago and that is stretching it... So last year Roddick was more of a favorite over Murray at the 2012 US Open because he has won it, I'm a Roddick fan but i am not delusional.
I disagree. How can I put Murray above 3 guys who have actually won wimbeldon in the last 3 years? What has Murray done on grass in the last 2-3 years (besides olympics) to put him above these guys??? be realistic dude..
last 2 years: Djokovic has the edge.
last 4-10 years: Fed has the edge.
If they meet at 2013 RG SF it's 51/49 for Fed for me. If the real Fed shows up, he wins. He already owned Djokovic 2.0 there, so it should only be easier.