MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - Did Federer Win The Title For Novak?

View Single Post

Old 01-29-2013, 08:45 AM   #89
country flag MIMIC
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Age: 28
Posts: 10,795
MIMIC has a reputation beyond reputeMIMIC has a reputation beyond reputeMIMIC has a reputation beyond reputeMIMIC has a reputation beyond reputeMIMIC has a reputation beyond reputeMIMIC has a reputation beyond reputeMIMIC has a reputation beyond reputeMIMIC has a reputation beyond reputeMIMIC has a reputation beyond reputeMIMIC has a reputation beyond reputeMIMIC has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: Did Federer Win The Title For Novak?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sham Kay View Post
Do find it funny that the Djokovic fans who used the tiredness and wind machine cards, find this a ridiculous proposition. You double-standards munching numbnuts.
Djokovic vs. Ferrer in slams

2007 U.S. Open: Djokovic def. Ferrer 6-4, 6-4, 6-3
-Windy? No

2008 Australian Open: Djokovic def. Ferrer 6-0, 6-3, 7-5
-Windy? No

2012 Australian Open: Djokovic def. Ferrer 6-4, 7-6(4), 6-1
Windy? No

2012 U.S. Open: Djokovic def. Ferrer 2-6, 6-1, 6-4, 6-2
Windy during the first set? Yes. Windy during the last 3 (which were played on a totally different day)? No

2013 Australian Open: Djokovic def. Ferrer 6-2, 6-2, 6-1
Windy? No.

Are there any examples of how a rested, "blisterless" Murray handles Djokovic in slams? Because excluding the one this year, there has been only ONE match in which one player dominated, and Djokovic won that one.

It doesn't matter whether Murray is rested and doesn't have blisters. Djokovic has shown that he is more than capable of handling Murray.

The wind was a legitimate factor in Djokovic's loss. Murray having a blister or whatever is not.
MIMIC is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote