MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?

View Single Post

Old 01-17-2013, 01:07 PM   #101
country flag uxyzapenje
Registered User
 
uxyzapenje's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: At home.
Posts: 4,442
uxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond reputeuxyzapenje has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Typhoon20 View Post
From a competitive standpoint - YES. Murray belongs in the top 4.
From a career standpoint - NOT YET. Not yet meaning he will. It's just a matter of time before he collects more slams.

I think the OP meant to say from a competitive standpoint.

But if he meant to to say from a competitive standpoint, then why would no. of Slams matter? I mean, then we should only look at level of play and partially their H2Hs, not # of Slams... But the # of Slams is contained in the thread title, so I would say it's the other way around. Or he just wanted to troll, that's the 3rd option...
__________________
Djokovic | Tipsarevic | Querrey
uxyzapenje is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote