Originally Posted by Sophocles
The point is that Murray's record against Nadal, while far from stellar, is far superior to nearly every other player's. Nadal also has significant H2H leads against the other 2 in the big 4.
I'm sorry? Nole has played Nadal a total of 14 times on clay. and the H2H is 14-19...
Murray played him 4 times on clay and the H2H is 5-13.
How can you even comapre the H2H.
Only a fool would say Murray is not a part of the big 4. But I don't think you have a point with this H2H argument.