MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?

View Single Post

Old 01-17-2013, 01:47 PM   #98
country flag arm
Registered User
 
arm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 27,858
arm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sophocles View Post
The point is that Murray's record against Nadal, while far from stellar, is far superior to nearly every other player's. Nadal also has significant H2H leads against the other 2 in the big 4.
I'm sorry? Nole has played Nadal a total of 14 times on clay. and the H2H is 14-19...

Murray played him 4 times on clay and the H2H is 5-13.

How can you even comapre the H2H.

Only a fool would say Murray is not a part of the big 4. But I don't think you have a point with this H2H argument.
arm is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote