Re: 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?
Originally Posted by GSMnadal
No one, because there's no such thing as the big four. Are we going to start talking about the big 5 and drag Ferrer into it as well? If 1 slam is enough, 0 should suffice as well, the difference is even less than the difference between Nole and Andy, let's not even begin talking about Federer and Nadal.
Quit the Murray hate you tard.
__________________Mark Lenders banged your girlfriend, I'm sorry to tell you that mate.