MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?

View Single Post

Old 01-16-2013, 05:09 PM   #54
country flag arm
Registered User
 
arm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 27,805
arm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond reputearm has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?

Quote:
Originally Posted by janko05 View Post
Agree, but what bothers me the most is who should be considered member of the big 3 instead?
There wouldn't be a big 3 if you were to consider the number of slams only.

Hewitt has 2 slams, maybe he should be considered in this equation, no?

This whole thread is pointless. You consider "the big 4", 3, 5 or whatever, the players whose achievements and consistency creates a gap between them and the rest of the field. And given this definition, and since we should probably talk about the PRESENT, Murray damn well deserves the right to be considered part of "the big 4". Right now, he deserves it more than Nadal even.
arm is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote