MensTennisForums.com - View Single Post - 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?

Thread: 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?
View Single Post

Old 01-16-2013, 04:06 PM   #47
country flag janko05
Registered User
 
janko05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,784
janko05 has a reputation beyond reputejanko05 has a reputation beyond reputejanko05 has a reputation beyond reputejanko05 has a reputation beyond reputejanko05 has a reputation beyond reputejanko05 has a reputation beyond reputejanko05 has a reputation beyond reputejanko05 has a reputation beyond reputejanko05 has a reputation beyond reputejanko05 has a reputation beyond reputejanko05 has a reputation beyond repute
Default Re: 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?
Quote:
Originally Posted by arm View Post
If you're going to go that way, then 28 slams combined vs 5... does Nole deserve to be in the big 3?
Agree, but what bothers me the most is who should be considered member of the big 3 instead?
janko05 is offline View My Blog!   Reply With Quote