33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?
View Single Post
01-16-2013, 05:06 PM
Join Date: Feb 2010
Re: 33 combined slams vs 1 - does Murray have the right to be in a "big four"?
Originally Posted by
If you're going to go that way, then 28 slams combined vs 5... does Nole deserve to be in the big 3?
Agree, but what bothers me the most is who should be considered member of the big 3 instead?
Originally Posted by:
Rafael has won more titles than Novak Djokovic, but speaking merely about tennis and about the game,
Rafa has to be considered slightly lower than Djokovic
. The Serb is such a good player that he is as close as you can get to Roger Federer
View Public Profile
Find More Posts by janko05